DSCI DCPP-01 Exam - Topic 1 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for DSCI's DCPP-01 exam

Question #: 39
Topic #: 1

According to the IT (Amendment) Act, 2008, a corporate entity could be liable to pay compensation for negligence in implementing and maintaining reasonable security practices and procedures in order to protect Sensitive Personal Data or Information. What is the amount of penalty?

AUpper limit not defined

BRs. 5,000,000

CRs. 50,000,000

DRs. 500,000,000

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Mozell at Dec 24, 2023, 12:04 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DCPP-01 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Pamella

8 months ago

Nope, it's definitely Rs. 50,000,000.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jess

8 months ago

I thought it was an upper limit not defined.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nieves

8 months ago

Wait, is it really that much? Sounds excessive.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felix

8 months ago

Totally agree, that's a hefty fine!

upvoted 0 times

...

Tula

8 months ago

The penalty is Rs. 50,000,000.

upvoted 0 times

...

Freeman

9 months ago

I remember discussing the penalties in class, and I thought it was Rs. 50,000,000, but I could be mixing it up with another regulation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristofer

9 months ago

I practiced a similar question last week, and I think the penalty was Rs. 5,000,000, but I'm not entirely sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Andra

9 months ago

I recall that the upper limit wasn't clearly defined in some cases, so I'm leaning towards option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashaunda

9 months ago

I think the penalty amount is quite high, but I can't remember if it's Rs. 50,000,000 or Rs. 500,000,000.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adela

9 months ago

Ah, I remember learning about this in class. The key is to focus on the phrase "Sensitive Personal Data or Information." That should give me a clue to the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Danica

9 months ago

Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. The wording is a bit tricky, and I'm not familiar with the details of the IT Act. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tien

9 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about the IT Act. I'm pretty confident I can find the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Freeman

9 months ago

Okay, let me break this down step-by-step. The question is asking about the penalty for negligence in implementing security practices to protect sensitive data. I'll need to review the relevant sections of the IT Act to determine the correct amount.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amber

9 months ago

Ah, this is a good one. I remember learning about the storage limitations of RDS, so I think I've got a good handle on this. Time to put that knowledge to the test.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharika

9 months ago

I'm feeling a bit confused about whether actual prime cost really prevents inefficiencies—it sounds like it might but I need to double-check my notes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alaine

10 months ago

Okay, let's see. Posting responses to explain the problem and timeline for resolution seems like the most reasonable option. Gotta address the customer concerns head-on.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tyra

1 year ago

Wait, is this a trick question? What if the answer is actually 'none of the above'? I'm just going to go with my gut and say C) Rs. 50,000,000. Or maybe I should just flip a coin...

upvoted 0 times

Glennis

1 year ago

User 3: I believe the upper limit is not defined, so A) Upper limit not defined.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maira

1 year ago

User 2: I'm not sure, but I'll go with B) Rs. 5,000,000.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marleen

1 year ago

User 1: I think the penalty amount is C) Rs. 50,000,000.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

1 year ago

I'm going to have to go with C) Rs. 50,000,000. It just feels like the sweet spot between a slap on the wrist and breaking the bank. Though I'm sure the lawmakers had a good reason for the number they chose.

upvoted 0 times

Oliva

1 year ago

Yeah, it's important to have consequences for negligence in data protection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chanel

1 year ago

I agree, it seems like a significant amount without being excessive.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beata

1 year ago

I think C) Rs. 50,000,000 is a reasonable choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edda

1 year ago

Hold on, what if I told you the correct answer is A) Upper limit not defined? That would be a real plot twist, wouldn't it? Time to brush up on the latest amendments!

upvoted 0 times

...

Vanesa

1 year ago

Whoa, that's a hefty fine! D) Rs. 500,000,000 seems a bit extreme, doesn't it? I'm going with C) Rs. 50,000,000 as the more reasonable upper limit.

upvoted 0 times

Mira

1 year ago

C) Rs. 50,000,000

upvoted 0 times

...

Tequila

1 year ago

B) Rs. 5,000,000

upvoted 0 times

...

Gianna

1 year ago

A) Upper limit not defined

upvoted 0 times

...

Buck

1 year ago

I think the answer is B) Rs. 5,000,000. The IT (Amendment) Act, 2008 sets a clear limit on the penalty for negligence in protecting Sensitive Personal Data or Information.

upvoted 0 times