Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

DSCI DCPLA Exam - Topic 1 Question 45 Discussion

Posted by Camellia on Oct 23, 2024 at 01:25 AM

In the landmark case _______________ the Honourable Supreme Court of India reaffirmed the status of Right to Privacy as a Fundamental Right under Part III of the constitution.

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium DCPLA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
42 comments · newest first
AR
Argelia 10 months ago
Wait, are we sure it wasn't M. P. Sharma?
YU
Yuriko 11 months ago
Right to Privacy is so crucial, glad it got recognized!
KR
Kris 11 months ago
Really? I thought it was Maneka Gandhi's case.
CY
Cyril 11 months ago
Totally agree, that case was a game changer!
WI
Willard 11 months ago
It's C, Justice K. S. Puttaswamy case.
HU
Hubert 12 months ago
I’m leaning towards Justice K. S. Puttaswamy, as it was a significant ruling on privacy, but I hope I’m not mixing it up with another case.
GE
Georgiann 12 months ago
I feel like the answer might be M. P. Sharma, but that doesn't seem right for privacy specifically.
MA
Margarett 12 months ago
I remember practicing a question about the Right to Privacy, and I think it was related to Maneka Gandhi's case too.
MI
Michael 1 year ago
I think the case is Justice K. S. Puttaswamy vs. Union of India, but I'm not entirely sure.
TH
Thurman 1 year ago
This is a great question to test our knowledge of important constitutional law cases. I feel prepared to tackle this - the Puttaswamy case is the one that clearly established privacy as a fundamental right, so I'm going with C.
AR
Armanda 1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options mention a few different cases, and I'm not completely familiar with the details of each one. I'll have to carefully review the information provided to make the best guess.
SA
Santos 1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking about a landmark Supreme Court case that reaffirmed the right to privacy as a fundamental right. I'm pretty confident the answer is C, Justice K.S. Puttaswamy vs. Union of India.
WI
Wilda 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to double-check the key details to make sure I don't miss anything.
RE
Refugia 1 year ago
Wait, there's a right to privacy in India? I thought the government was supposed to know everything about everyone. Guess they didn't get the memo.
OD
Odelia 1 year ago
Hmm, let's see. I'll go with C, the Puttaswamy case. I'm not about to get tripped up by some obscure legal trivia. Gotta keep my eye on the prize, you know?
ER
Ernie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Odelia
Absolutely, knowing the important cases is crucial in understanding legal rights.
CL
Clemencia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Odelia
It's important to stay focused on the key cases like Puttaswamy.
IO
Iola 1 year ago
↳ replying to Odelia
Definitely, it solidified the Right to Privacy as a Fundamental Right.
DI
Dierdre 1 year ago
↳ replying to Odelia
I agree, the Puttaswamy case was a landmark decision.
KA
Kathrine 1 year ago
I'm just going to go with C. I mean, it's not like the other options have the words 'right to privacy' in them. The Puttaswamy case is the obvious choice here.
VE
Verda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kathrine
C is the one that explicitly deals with the Right to Privacy. It's the clear answer.
PE
Pearly 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kathrine
Definitely, C is the landmark case that solidified the Right to Privacy in India.
JO
Joni 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kathrine
I agree, C is the correct choice. The Puttaswamy case established the Right to Privacy as a Fundamental Right.
ME
Merissa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kathrine
D) Olga Tellis vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation
CO
Cory 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kathrine
C) Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anr. vs. Union of India And Ors
JA
James 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kathrine
B) Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India
GI
Giovanna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kathrine
A) M. P. Sharma and others vs. Satish Chandra, District Magistrate, Delhi, and others
OL
Olive 1 year ago
Of course, the Puttaswamy case is the correct answer. The Supreme Court's ruling on the right to privacy was groundbreaking. I can't believe anyone would think it was one of the older cases.
AN
Annita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Olive
It's amazing how far-reaching the implications of that ruling are.
LO
Lorenza 1 year ago
↳ replying to Olive
Absolutely, it solidified the right to privacy as a fundamental right.
AL
Alonso 1 year ago
↳ replying to Olive
The Puttaswamy case was definitely groundbreaking.
MA
Marjory 1 year ago
↳ replying to Olive
D) Olga Tellis vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation
DE
Demetra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Olive
C) Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anr. vs. Union of India And Ors
ST
Stefan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Olive
B) Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India
CA
Camellia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Olive
A) M. P. Sharma and others vs. Satish Chandra, District Magistrate, Delhi, and others
RE
Remona 1 year ago
This is a trick question! The right to privacy was not established in the cases mentioned in options A, B, or D. It has to be C, the landmark Puttaswamy case.
FA
Fatima 1 year ago
↳ replying to Remona
That's right! The Supreme Court reaffirmed the right to privacy in the Puttaswamy case.
FA
Fatima 1 year ago
↳ replying to Remona
You are correct! The Puttaswamy case established the right to privacy as a fundamental right.
FA
Fatima 1 year ago
↳ replying to Remona
C) Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anr. vs. Union of India And Ors
ST
Stephaine 1 year ago
I remember studying about this case, the rationale behind the decision was to protect individual liberties and autonomy.
SE
Selene 2 years ago
I agree with Arlen, the Supreme Court reaffirmed Right to Privacy as a Fundamental Right in that case.
AR
Arlen 2 years ago
I think the answer is C) Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anr. vs. Union of India And Ors.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel