Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

DSCI DCPLA Exam - Topic 1 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for DSCI's DCPLA exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 1
[All DCPLA Questions]

In the landmark case _______________ the Honourable Supreme Court of India reaffirmed the status of Right to Privacy as a Fundamental Right under Part III of the constitution.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Camellia at Oct 23, 2024, 01:25 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DCPLA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Argelia
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure it wasn't M. P. Sharma?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
5 months ago
Right to Privacy is so crucial, glad it got recognized!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
5 months ago
Really? I thought it was Maneka Gandhi's case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
5 months ago
Totally agree, that case was a game changer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
5 months ago
It's C, Justice K. S. Puttaswamy case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards Justice K. S. Puttaswamy, as it was a significant ruling on privacy, but I hope I’m not mixing it up with another case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiann
6 months ago
I feel like the answer might be M. P. Sharma, but that doesn't seem right for privacy specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
6 months ago
I remember practicing a question about the Right to Privacy, and I think it was related to Maneka Gandhi's case too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michael
6 months ago
I think the case is Justice K. S. Puttaswamy vs. Union of India, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
6 months ago
This is a great question to test our knowledge of important constitutional law cases. I feel prepared to tackle this - the Puttaswamy case is the one that clearly established privacy as a fundamental right, so I'm going with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armanda
6 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options mention a few different cases, and I'm not completely familiar with the details of each one. I'll have to carefully review the information provided to make the best guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
6 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking about a landmark Supreme Court case that reaffirmed the right to privacy as a fundamental right. I'm pretty confident the answer is C, Justice K.S. Puttaswamy vs. Union of India.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
6 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to double-check the key details to make sure I don't miss anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
11 months ago
Wait, there's a right to privacy in India? I thought the government was supposed to know everything about everyone. Guess they didn't get the memo.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
11 months ago
Hmm, let's see. I'll go with C, the Puttaswamy case. I'm not about to get tripped up by some obscure legal trivia. Gotta keep my eye on the prize, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Ernie
9 months ago
Absolutely, knowing the important cases is crucial in understanding legal rights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
10 months ago
It's important to stay focused on the key cases like Puttaswamy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
10 months ago
Definitely, it solidified the Right to Privacy as a Fundamental Right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
10 months ago
I agree, the Puttaswamy case was a landmark decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kathrine
11 months ago
I'm just going to go with C. I mean, it's not like the other options have the words 'right to privacy' in them. The Puttaswamy case is the obvious choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Verda
9 months ago
C is the one that explicitly deals with the Right to Privacy. It's the clear answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
9 months ago
Definitely, C is the landmark case that solidified the Right to Privacy in India.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
9 months ago
I agree, C is the correct choice. The Puttaswamy case established the Right to Privacy as a Fundamental Right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
9 months ago
D) Olga Tellis vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
10 months ago
C) Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anr. vs. Union of India And Ors
upvoted 0 times
...
James
10 months ago
B) Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
10 months ago
A) M. P. Sharma and others vs. Satish Chandra, District Magistrate, Delhi, and others
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Olive
11 months ago
Of course, the Puttaswamy case is the correct answer. The Supreme Court's ruling on the right to privacy was groundbreaking. I can't believe anyone would think it was one of the older cases.
upvoted 0 times
Annita
10 months ago
It's amazing how far-reaching the implications of that ruling are.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorenza
10 months ago
Absolutely, it solidified the right to privacy as a fundamental right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
10 months ago
The Puttaswamy case was definitely groundbreaking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
10 months ago
D) Olga Tellis vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
10 months ago
C) Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anr. vs. Union of India And Ors
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
10 months ago
B) Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
10 months ago
A) M. P. Sharma and others vs. Satish Chandra, District Magistrate, Delhi, and others
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Remona
11 months ago
This is a trick question! The right to privacy was not established in the cases mentioned in options A, B, or D. It has to be C, the landmark Puttaswamy case.
upvoted 0 times
Fatima
10 months ago
That's right! The Supreme Court reaffirmed the right to privacy in the Puttaswamy case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
10 months ago
You are correct! The Puttaswamy case established the right to privacy as a fundamental right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
11 months ago
C) Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anr. vs. Union of India And Ors
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
12 months ago
I remember studying about this case, the rationale behind the decision was to protect individual liberties and autonomy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selene
1 year ago
I agree with Arlen, the Supreme Court reaffirmed Right to Privacy as a Fundamental Right in that case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
1 year ago
I think the answer is C) Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anr. vs. Union of India And Ors.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel