MENU
A storage administrator has one production site and one remote site. The administrator configured the RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) cluster at both sites. The current environment
has two Consistency Groups configured with two copies each; one production copy and one remote copy. Based on the company's growing business requirements, the
administrator has been asked to keep a local copy of the production data.
Which action should occur in order to meet this requirement?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium D-RP-OE-A-24 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
To meet the requirement of keeping a local copy of the production data in a RecoverPoint environment with VNX(SE) clusters, the administrator can add a local copy into the existing Consistency Group. This action does not require deleting and reconfiguring the existing Consistency Group or upgrading the license. Here are the steps:
Access Unisphere for RecoverPoint: Log into the Unisphere interface for RecoverPoint management.
Navigate to the Consistency Group: Find the Consistency Group that needs the local copy.
Add a Local Copy: Use the option to add a copy into the selected Consistency Group.
Configure the Local Copy: Specify the settings for the local copy, such as the Journal volume and RPO settings.
Apply Changes: Save the changes to implement the local replication.
38 comments · newest first
ST
Stephen
10 months ago
No way, D sounds too complicated for this situation!
JE
Jeanice
11 months ago
I think C might work too, but not sure if it’s the best option.
YO
Yong
11 months ago
Wait, can you really upgrade to RecoverPoint/EX? That’s new to me!
GO
Goldie
11 months ago
Totally agree, B is the way to go!
CL
Clement
11 months ago
A is correct, you can't have more than two copies in a Consistency Group.
HY
Hyman
12 months ago
Upgrading the license sounds familiar, but I’m uncertain if that’s necessary just to add a local copy. I wish I had reviewed that section more thoroughly.
SK
Skye
12 months ago
I feel like adding a copy to the existing Consistency Group could work, but I can't recall if there are specific restrictions with that setup.
LA
Laquanda
12 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this where we had to decide whether to delete and reconfigure a Consistency Group. That might be the right approach here.
MI
Mitsue
1 year ago
I remember something about the limitations of Consistency Groups, but I'm not sure if it was specifically about the number of copies.
LU
Ludivina
1 year ago
Ah, I see. The question mentions the company's growing business requirements, so we need to upgrade the license to RecoverPoint/EX to support more than two copies. Option D seems like the way to go.
AL
Allene
1 year ago
Based on the information provided, I believe the correct answer is to delete and reconfigure the existing Consistency Group for a local and remote replication, so I'll go with option B.
LA
Laticia
1 year ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Doesn't the question say the current setup has two copies already? How can we add a third one?
JA
Jacqueline
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the details and options to figure out the best approach.
LE
Lenita
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to add a local copy to the existing Consistency Group, so I'll go with option C.
SH
Sherill
1 year ago
Wait, I'm not sure about that. I think we need to consider the fees and other costs associated with each option to get the true effective rate. This isn't as straightforward as it seems.
BR
Britt
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the benefits of using Okta for IAM. I'll focus on highlighting the key points from the solution, like the ability to securely connect users to apps and the wide range of integrations.
SH
Shoshana
2 years ago
Personally, I'd go with Option C. Adding a copy sounds like the easiest and most straightforward solution. Plus, who doesn't love a little light data replication? It's like storage admin speed dating!
KE
Keena
2 years ago
It's like a storage admin speed dating, just adding a little local data replication!
CH
Chantell
2 years ago
Definitely, adding a copy for local replication would be the most efficient way to meet the requirement.
KA
Kate
2 years ago
I agree, it would be much easier than deleting and reconfiguring the Consistency Group.
CH
Charlesetta
2 years ago
Option C sounds like the best choice. Adding a local copy seems like the simplest solution.
ST
Staci
2 years ago
Option A really throws me off. I mean, if RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) can't handle more than two copies, why are they even asking this question? Talk about a head-scratcher.
AL
Alaine
2 years ago
Ah, the old 'delete and reconfigure' solution. Classic! But hey, if it works, it works, right? Gotta love the 'if it ain't broke, break it' approach.
SH
Shawnna
2 years ago
C: I guess it's the best way to ensure everything is set up correctly for the new requirements.
KR
Kris
2 years ago
B: Totally, it's like hitting the reset button and starting over.
TE
Tegan
2 years ago
A: Yeah, sometimes you just gotta start fresh with a clean slate.
IZ
Izetta
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. What if the existing setup can't handle the extra copy? Might be better to look into upgrading the license, just to be safe.
DE
Dean
2 years ago
That sounds like a safer option. It's better to upgrade the license to ensure everything runs smoothly.
CL
Clay
2 years ago
Maybe we should consider upgrading the RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) license to RecoverPoint/EX and then reconfigure the Consistency Group.
HU
Hubert
2 years ago
That could work, but what if the existing setup can't handle the extra copy?
TI
Tiera
2 years ago
I think we should add a copy into the existing Consistency Group for a local replication.
PE
Pete
2 years ago
I agree with Nichelle, adding a copy for local replication seems like a more practical solution for now.
NI
Nichelle
2 years ago
That could be an option too, but I believe adding a copy for local replication might be a quicker solution.
IS
Isaac
2 years ago
Option C seems like the obvious choice here. Why delete and reconfigure when you can just add another copy? Keeps things simple, you know?
TA
Talia
2 years ago
I agree, it's much simpler than deleting and reconfiguring the Consistency Group. Option C is the best choice.
JO
Joseph
2 years ago
Option C is definitely the way to go. Adding a copy for local replication is the most efficient solution.
SI
Silva
2 years ago
But wouldn't it be better to upgrade the license to RecoverPoint/EX and then reconfigure the Consistency Group?
NI
Nichelle
2 years ago
I think we should add a copy into the existing Consistency Group for a local replication.