MENU
A network administrator wants servers to avoid spanning-tree convergence immediately after connecting to a leaf switch. Which spanning-tree feature would allow this?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium D-NWG-FN-23 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
23 comments · newest first
BE
Bernardo
10 months ago
A and C don't really help with convergence, just saying.
TA
Tammi
11 months ago
I've always used D for this, works like a charm!
KI
Kimberlie
11 months ago
Wait, are you sure about that?
TO
Tora
11 months ago
Totally agree, edge ports skip STP.
RA
Rachael
11 months ago
D is the right choice, it makes ports edge ports.
AI
Aileen
12 months ago
I’m confused about the options. I thought "spanning-tree vlan priority 0" could also play a role, but now I’m not so sure. Maybe I need to review that section again.
CA
Catalina
12 months ago
I feel like we discussed this in class, and "spanning-tree port-type edge" was mentioned as a way to speed things up. So, I’m leaning towards D as well.
RO
Rodolfo
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about port types in our practice questions. Could it be B, "spanning-tree port-type disabled"?
AG
Agustin
1 year ago
I think the answer might be D, "spanning-tree port-type edge." It seems like that would help avoid convergence issues right after connecting a switch.
LI
Lisha
1 year ago
I think D is the right answer here. Spanning-tree port-type edge should configure the port as an edge port, which would bypass the normal spanning-tree convergence process when the servers connect to the leaf switch.
NA
Nathalie
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about a spanning-tree feature that would allow servers to avoid convergence when connecting to a leaf switch. I'm leaning towards D, spanning-tree port-type edge, since that should make the port an edge port and avoid the convergence process.
RO
Ronnie
1 year ago
I think the answer is D. Spanning-tree port-type edge should allow the servers to avoid spanning-tree convergence when connecting to a leaf switch.
VE
Veta
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. Maybe B or D could work, but I'm not completely confident.
JU
Justine
1 year ago
I think the command I need to use is ipadm show-addr. That seems to be the most direct way to display the IP address assignments.
HA
Harris
1 year ago
Okay, let me review the options and see if I can identify the two true statements.
AL
Alva
1 year ago
I recall something about how façades help in managing dependencies, but I'm second-guessing whether they always deal with negative coupling.
BA
Barbra
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think A) spanning-tree vlan priority 0 could also help in avoiding spanning-tree convergence.
JE
Jesusita
2 years ago
I agree with Shawna, because setting the port type to edge would make the switch immediately move to the forwarding state.
SH
Shawna
2 years ago
I think the answer is D) spanning-tree port-type edge.
MI
Mi
2 years ago
I don't think that would help with immediate convergence, as it's about setting the priority for the entire vlan.
GI
Gilbert
2 years ago
But what about option A) spanning-tree vlan priority 0?
NA
Natalie
2 years ago
I agree, setting the port to edge would make it immediately transition to the forwarding state.
AD
Adela
2 years ago
I think the answer is D) spanning-tree port-type edge.