Dell EMC Exam E20-260 Topic 4 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Dell EMC's E20-260 exam

Question #: 84
Topic #: 4

Refer to the exhibit.

You have created a Distributed Device in a VPLEX Metro. You want to confirm the volumes before performing a mobility job within the cluster. You will be moving the device to cluster 1.

Which object will be the source for this operation?

Aextent_Symm0841_03A7_1

BDD_8_32012Nov26_183659

CSymm0841_03A7

DDD_7_3

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Keneth at Apr 13, 2024, 03:11 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium E20-260 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Ming

11 months ago

But could it be A since only one director failed during the power disruption?

upvoted 0 times

...

Whitney

11 months ago

I agree with User1, it must be C because not all 'A' directors were affected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trevor

11 months ago

I disagree, I believe it's D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Candida

11 months ago

I agree with Tiara. The message likely appeared because of the single director failure. Option A seems like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gayla

11 months ago

I think the answer is C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiara

11 months ago

I don't think so. If the power disruption only affected one director, it makes more sense that it's related to that. So I still lean towards option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louisa

11 months ago

But what about option D? Could the vaulting process running on cluster-1 have caused the message?

upvoted 0 times

...

Arthur

12 months ago

That makes sense. So option A could be the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiara

12 months ago

I think the message appeared because the power disruption only affected a single director.

upvoted 0 times

...

Juan

1 years ago

I think C is the right answer. The question says the power disruption didn't affect all 'A' directors, so the vaulting process would be impacted even though it's running on a different cluster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helene

1 years ago

Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm curious why the vaulting process would be impacted at all if it's running on a different cluster. D seems like it could be the answer, but I'm not totally confident.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristel

1 years ago

I'm not so sure. If the power disruption only affected a single director, wouldn't the vaulting process just fail over to the other director in the cluster? I'm not convinced A is the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bronwyn

1 years ago

I'm leaning towards A. The power disruption only affected a single director, so the vaulting process should still be able to run on the other directors in the cluster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carole

1 years ago

I think the answer is probably B. The question says the power disruption only affected cluster 2, so it shouldn't have impacted the vaulting process running on cluster 1.

upvoted 0 times

Reita

11 months ago

It could be C though. The disruption might not have affected all 'A' directors.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nickolas

11 months ago

I think the answer is probably B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aleshia

1 years ago

This question seems pretty straightforward, but I'm not sure about the answer. The power disruption only affected cluster 2, so I'm not sure why the vaulting process would be impacted.

upvoted 0 times

...