Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Dell EMC Exam D-PWF-DS-23 Topic 1 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Dell EMC's D-PWF-DS-23 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 1
[All D-PWF-DS-23 Questions]

A customer is trying to place an SDS into Protected Maintenance Mode, and the operation fails What two scenarios can cause the failure'' (Select 2)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

FSN, or File Storage Network, is the component within the PowerFlex software suite that enables data availability over NAS (Network Attached Storage).It is designed to integrate file services into the PowerFlex system, allowing for the management of file shares alongside block storage within the same infrastructure1.

The FSN component provides the necessary functionality to create, manage, and serve file systems over the network, making it possible for clients to access shared files and directories as if they were local.This integration simplifies the storage architecture and provides a unified storage solution for both block and file data requirements1.

The other options listed, such as SDR (Storage Data Replicator), LIA (Log Integration Adapter), and SDT (Software-Defined Technology), do not specifically relate to the provision of NAS services within the PowerFlex environment. Therefore, the correct answer is A. FSN, as it is the PowerFlex software component responsible for enabling NAS capabilities within the cluster.


by Irma at Jul 08, 2024, 02:23 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium D-PWF-DS-23 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Dana
1 months ago
I'm stumped! Is there a 'None of the above' option? This question is giving me a headache, and I think I need a coffee break.
upvoted 0 times
Jesse
4 days ago
User 3: I agree, that could be one of the scenarios causing the failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
19 days ago
User 2: Maybe the failure is due to another node in the same protection domain being in maintenance mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
22 days ago
User 1: Don't worry, it's not that complicated. Let's figure it out together.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dannie
1 months ago
I'm going with B and C. It just makes sense that if another node in the same protection domain is already in a maintenance mode, it would block the customer's attempt to put their node into protected maintenance mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
1 months ago
Ha! I bet the customer is wishing they had a crystal ball to see which node was in what mode. Gotta love these tricky certification questions!
upvoted 0 times
Dominque
6 days ago
A) Another node in a different protection domain is in protected maintenance mode
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yvonne
2 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. It seems like A and D could also cause the failure, but I'm not confident enough to select those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
2 months ago
I think B and C are the correct answers. If another node in the same protection domain is in maintenance mode, it would prevent the customer from putting the node into protected maintenance mode.
upvoted 0 times
Kattie
10 days ago
User 3: That's right, another node failing in the same protection domain can also prevent the operation from being successful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
13 days ago
User 2: Yes, if another node in the same protection domain is in maintenance mode, it can cause the failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
1 months ago
User 1: I think B and C are the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zona
2 months ago
I see your point, Pa. It's important to consider all possibilities when troubleshooting issues like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
3 months ago
I agree with Trina, that could definitely be one of the scenarios. Another node in a different protection domain being in instant maintenance mode could also cause the failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
3 months ago
I think the failure could be caused by another node in the same protection domain being in maintenance mode.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel