New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Dell EMC D-NWG-FN-23 Exam - Topic 5 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Dell EMC's D-NWG-FN-23 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 5
[All D-NWG-FN-23 Questions]

A customer reports they can no longer access their services and a network administrator has been assigned to investigate. A UFD disabled error status appears on all ports. What caused the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Mammie at Nov 19, 2025, 07:41 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium D-NWG-FN-23 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ryan
15 hours ago
I think it's definitely B. An interface going down makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
6 days ago
D sounds plausible too, but I lean towards B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Long
11 days ago
I agree with B, that's the most likely cause here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
16 days ago
Wait, is C really normal behavior? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
21 days ago
I think it's A, the loop-guard could be messing things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alana
26 days ago
A) Spanning tree Loop-guard was implemented on the uplink-state group. Sounds like a classic case of "let's add more features until it breaks!"
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanja
1 month ago
C) There was no issue; this is normal behavior. Wait, is this the IT version of "have you tried turning it off and on again?"
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
1 month ago
D) Both a port channel and its members were assigned to an uplink-state group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashida
1 month ago
I think option D makes sense because if both a port channel and its members are in the same group, it could cause issues. But I'm not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
2 months ago
I feel like I read somewhere that UFD disabled can be normal in certain scenarios, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
2 months ago
This seems similar to a practice question we did on spanning tree protocols. I think option B could be the right answer if an interface went down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederic
2 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. The error message points to a problem with an uplink-state group, so I'm going to go with option B. One of the upstream interfaces in the uplink-state group must have gone down, causing the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
2 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. The key is to focus on the "UFD disabled error status" on all ports. That sounds like a spanning tree issue, so I'm going to lean towards options A or D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
2 months ago
Definitely B, an upstream interface must be down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
2 months ago
B) One of the upstream interfaces is an uplink-state group went down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
3 months ago
I remember studying about uplink-state groups, but I'm not entirely sure how they affect port statuses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
3 months ago
Hmm, this looks like it's testing our knowledge of network troubleshooting. I'm going to read through the options carefully and try to eliminate the ones that don't make sense based on the error message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
3 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. The question seems a bit tricky, and I'm not familiar with some of the networking terms like "uplink-state group" and "loop-guard." I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Lilli
3 months ago
What about option D? Could that also be a reason?
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel