Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Databricks Machine Learning Professional Exam - Topic 10 Question 54 Discussion

Which of the following is a reason for using Jensen-Shannon (JS) distance over a Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test for numeric feature drift detection?
D) JS is more robust when working with large datasets
A) All of these reasons
B) JS is not normalized or smoothed
C) None of these reasons
E) JS does not require any manual threshold or cutoff determinations

Databricks Machine Learning Professional Exam - Topic 10 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for Databricks's Databricks Machine Learning Professional exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 10
[All Databricks Machine Learning Professional Questions]

Which of the following is a reason for using Jensen-Shannon (JS) distance over a Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test for numeric feature drift detection?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Casandra
21 hours ago
I believe the answer might be A, since it seems like JS has multiple advantages over KS, but I’m a bit uncertain about the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
6 days ago
I feel like the normalization aspect of JS versus KS was discussed in class, but I can't remember if JS is actually normalized or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
11 days ago
I think I saw a practice question that mentioned JS being more robust with larger datasets, but I can't recall the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
2 months ago
I remember that JS distance is often preferred because it doesn't require manual thresholds, but I'm not sure if that's the only reason.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel