Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Databricks Exam Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Topic 6 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Databricks's Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 6
[All Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Questions]

A Generative AI Engineer just deployed an LLM application at a digital marketing company that assists with answering customer service inquiries.

Which metric should they monitor for their customer service LLM application in production?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

When deploying an LLM application for customer service inquiries, the primary focus is on measuring the operational efficiency and quality of the responses. Here's why A is the correct metric:

Number of customer inquiries processed per unit of time: This metric tracks the throughput of the customer service system, reflecting how many customer inquiries the LLM application can handle in a given time period (e.g., per minute or hour). High throughput is crucial in customer service applications where quick response times are essential to user satisfaction and business efficiency.

Real-time performance monitoring: Monitoring the number of queries processed is an important part of ensuring that the model is performing well under load, especially during peak traffic times. It also helps ensure the system scales properly to meet demand.

Why other options are not ideal:

B . Energy usage per query: While energy efficiency is a consideration, it is not the primary concern for a customer-facing application where user experience (i.e., fast and accurate responses) is critical.

C . Final perplexity scores for the training of the model: Perplexity is a metric for model training, but it doesn't reflect the real-time operational performance of an LLM in production.

D . HuggingFace Leaderboard values for the base LLM: The HuggingFace Leaderboard is more relevant during model selection and benchmarking. However, it is not a direct measure of the model's performance in a specific customer service application in production.

Focusing on throughput (inquiries processed per unit time) ensures that the LLM application is meeting business needs for fast and efficient customer service responses.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Marti
2 days ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about monitoring energy usage per query being important for sustainability. Could that be relevant here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
8 days ago
I think we should focus on the number of customer inquiries processed per unit of time. It seems like a direct measure of the LLM's effectiveness in a customer service role.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
13 days ago
For this type of customer service LLM application, I'd say the number of inquiries processed per unit of time (A) is the best metric to focus on. That will give us a clear sense of how efficiently the model is handling the workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
19 days ago
I'm a little confused on this one. Is the final perplexity score (C) or the HuggingFace Leaderboard values (D) something we should be looking at? I'm not sure how those metrics relate to the customer service performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannon
24 days ago
I think the answer is A. The key thing we want to measure is how well the LLM is handling the customer service inquiries, so the number of inquiries processed is the most relevant metric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
30 days ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm wondering if energy usage per query (B) might be more relevant since we want to monitor the efficiency and resource usage of the LLM application. I'll have to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernestine
1 month ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'd go with A - the number of customer inquiries processed per unit of time is a key metric to monitor for a customer service LLM application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
5 months ago
I think we should consider both A) and C) to get a comprehensive view of the performance of the LLM application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
5 months ago
I believe monitoring C) Final perplexity scores for the training of the model is also important to ensure the accuracy of the responses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
5 months ago
I agree with Alfred. That metric will show us how efficient the LLM application is in handling customer inquiries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
6 months ago
The correct answer is clearly A - number of customer inquiries processed. Unless they're running this thing on a potato, the energy usage is probably not a concern. And who cares about the leaderboard when you've got customers to serve?
upvoted 0 times
Sunny
4 months ago
Customer satisfaction should be the top priority when it comes to customer service applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
4 months ago
Final perplexity scores and HuggingFace Leaderboard values are more for model evaluation rather than production monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
4 months ago
Energy usage per query is not as important as ensuring efficient customer service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
5 months ago
I agree, monitoring the number of customer inquiries processed is crucial for the success of the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aracelis
6 months ago
Haha, energy usage per query? What is this, a green AI challenge? I think the Generative AI Engineer needs to focus on the actual business metrics, not how much electricity the model is chugging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
6 months ago
I'm going with option A. Gotta keep those customers happy and make sure the LLM is keeping up with the demand. Energy usage and leaderboard scores don't matter if the users aren't satisfied.
upvoted 0 times
Cassi
4 months ago
User 3: Monitoring the number of inquiries processed per unit of time is essential for efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
5 months ago
User 2: Definitely, keeping up with the demand is crucial for success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lachelle
5 months ago
User 1: I agree, customer satisfaction is key. Option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alfred
6 months ago
I think we should monitor A) Number of customer inquiries processed per unit of time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
6 months ago
Definitely the number of customer inquiries processed per unit of time. That's the key metric to track for a customer service LLM application. Anything else is just a distraction.
upvoted 0 times
Cristina
5 months ago
C: Final perplexity scores for the training of the model could also give us insights into the performance and accuracy of the LLM.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
5 months ago
B: Energy usage per query might be important too, we need to ensure efficiency in our operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
5 months ago
A: I agree, monitoring the number of customer inquiries processed per unit of time is crucial for the success of the LLM application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
5 months ago
C: Final perplexity scores for the training of the model could provide insights into the overall effectiveness and accuracy of the LLM application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearline
5 months ago
B: Energy usage per query might also be important to consider to ensure efficiency and cost-effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
6 months ago
A: I agree, tracking the number of customer inquiries processed per unit of time is crucial for monitoring the performance of the LLM application.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel