New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Databricks Certified Professional Data Scientist Exam - Topic 3 Question 89 Discussion

Actual exam question for Databricks's Databricks Certified Professional Data Scientist exam
Question #: 89
Topic #: 3
[All Databricks Certified Professional Data Scientist Questions]

Which of the following metrics are useful in measuring the accuracy and quality of a recommender system?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Nenita at Nov 24, 2025, 05:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Databricks Certified Professional Data Scientist Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Howard
9 hours ago
Cluster density isn't relevant for recommender systems, good to know.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
6 days ago
Wait, support vector count doesn't apply? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Moira
11 days ago
I disagree, sum of absolute errors is still useful in some contexts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
16 days ago
MAE and AUC are both good choices, but I'd go with MAE since it's more intuitive to understand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindy
21 days ago
Cluster density? Sounds more like a question about data clustering than recommender systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliseo
26 days ago
I agree, the MAE is a straightforward way to quantify the average error in the recommendations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
1 month ago
C) Mean Absolute Error seems like the most relevant metric to measure the accuracy of a recommender system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
1 month ago
I definitely remember that MAE is useful, but I’m a bit confused about when to use the sum of absolute errors. Is it really that helpful for assessing performance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
1 month ago
Cluster density and support vector count sound familiar, but I can't recall how they relate to recommender systems. I feel like they might be more relevant to clustering or classification tasks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
2 months ago
I think the sum of absolute errors is mentioned in some practice questions, but it seems less informative than MAE for recommender systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
2 months ago
I remember studying that MAE is a key metric for evaluating recommender systems, but I'm not entirely sure how it compares to other metrics like AUC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
2 months ago
Okay, got it. MAE measures the average error, which is a good indicator of a recommender system's accuracy. I think I can craft a solid response explaining why that's a useful metric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
2 months ago
MAE is definitely a key metric for accuracy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with recommender system metrics. I'll need to review the library references on MAE to make sure I understand it fully before answering this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
2 months ago
The question seems straightforward - MAE and AUC are the key metrics mentioned, so I'd focus on explaining those in my answer. The other options don't seem relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
3 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between MAE and the sum of absolute errors. Can someone clarify which one is the better metric for recommender systems?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
3 months ago
I think the MAE and AUC metrics would be the most useful for evaluating a recommender system. The MAE gives a good sense of the average error, while AUC measures the overall accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
Edwin
3 months ago
But what about the sum of absolute errors?
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
3 months ago
AUC is great for overall accuracy too!
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel