Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CyberArk SECRET-SEN Exam - Topic 7 Question 30 Discussion

A customer wants to ensure applications can retrieve secrets from Conjur in three different data centers if the Conjur Leader becomes unavailable. Conjur Followers are already deployed in each of these data centers.How should you architect the solution to support this requirement?
B) Deploy a Standby in each data center that can be promoted to the role of Leader.
A) No changes are required.
C) Extend the auto failover cluster to include Standby in each data center and allow for automatic recovery should the Leader become unavailable.
D) Deploy a CP provider on the Follower server to provide offline caching capabilities for the Follower.

CyberArk SECRET-SEN Exam - Topic 7 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's SECRET-SEN exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 7
[All SECRET-SEN Questions]

A customer wants to ensure applications can retrieve secrets from Conjur in three different data centers if the Conjur Leader becomes unavailable. Conjur Followers are already deployed in each of these data centers.

How should you architect the solution to support this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Yasuko at Oct 20, 2024, 01:18 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SECRET-SEN Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Leslie
9 months ago
Definitely need a failover plan, so C is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
9 months ago
Option D could be useful for caching, but not a full solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
9 months ago
Wait, can we really just do nothing with option A? Seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
10 months ago
I disagree, option B is simpler and effective enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
10 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense for auto recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
10 months ago
I think no changes are needed if the Followers are already set up, but I’m not confident that’s the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
10 months ago
I feel like we covered something about caching on Followers, but I can't recall if option D is the right approach for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think extending the auto failover cluster could be the best way to ensure availability, like option C suggests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
11 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of having a backup leader in case the primary goes down, so option B sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashley
11 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. I'd go with option C - extending the auto failover cluster to include Standby instances in each data center. That way, the failover will be automatic and the applications won't experience any downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The question is asking us to set up a highly available Conjur deployment, so we need to have Standby instances in each data center that can take over as the Leader if the current Leader becomes unavailable. That way, the applications can still access the secrets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between a Follower and a Standby in Conjur. I'll need to review the documentation to make sure I understand the architecture before I can confidently answer this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about ensuring high availability for Conjur. I think the key is to understand the difference between a Follower and a Standby, and how to set up automatic failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
1 year ago
I'm all about that Option C life. AuBelenatic recovery is the way to go - no need to manually promote a Standby, that's just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
1 year ago
Option D, huh? Deploying a CP provider on the Follower server for offline caching? Sounds like a real 'cache in the clouds' kind of move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
1 year ago
No changes required? That's a bold choice, Option A. I guess the customer just wants to live life on the edge!
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
1 year ago
I think Option B is the way to go. Deploying a Standby in each data center that can be promoted to the Leader role is a simple and straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
Leslie
1 year ago
It's a smart move to have redundancy in place by promoting a Standby to Leader in case of any failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
1 year ago
Deploying a Standby in each data center for failover seems like the best way to handle the situation if the Conjur Leader goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
1 year ago
Deploying a Standby in each data center is a good strategy for ensuring applications can still retrieve secrets even if the Leader goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
1 year ago
I agree, Option B seems like the most practical solution for ensuring applications can retrieve secrets from Conjur in multiple data centers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
1 year ago
I agree, it's a reliable solution to have a backup Leader ready to take over if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
1 year ago
Option B is definitely the best choice. Having a Standby in each data center ensures high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evelynn
1 year ago
Option B is a good choice. Having a Standby in each data center ready to be promoted to Leader is a solid plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wade
1 year ago
Option C seems like the best solution to me. Extending the auto failover cluster to include Standby in each data center will ensure automatic recovery if the Leader becomes unavailable.
upvoted 0 times
Hoa
1 year ago
Yes, it's important to have redundancy in place to ensure applications can still retrieve secrets from Conjur in case of Leader unavailability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
1 year ago
Deploying a CP provider on the Follower server for offline caching might also be a good idea to ensure seamless access to secrets in case of any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
1 year ago
I agree, having a Standby in each data center for automatic recovery is a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
1 year ago
I agree, having Standby in each data center for automatic recovery is crucial for ensuring applications can retrieve secrets from Conjur.
upvoted 0 times
...
Muriel
1 year ago
Option C seems like the best solution to me. Extending the auto failover cluster to include Standby in each data center will ensure automatic recovery if the Leader becomes unavailable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Effie
1 year ago
Option C seems like the best solution to me. Extending the auto failover cluster to include Standby in each data center will ensure automatic recovery if the Leader becomes unavailable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lanie
1 year ago
I'm not sure about option C. I think option B might also work by deploying a Standby in each data center that can be promoted to Leader.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
1 year ago
I agree with Elke. Option C provides the most reliable solution for ensuring applications can retrieve secrets from Conjur in multiple data centers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
1 year ago
I think option C is the best choice because it ensures automatic recovery in case the Leader becomes unavailable.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel