MENU
A customer wants to ensure applications can retrieve secrets from Conjur in three different data centers if the Conjur Leader becomes unavailable. Conjur Followers are already deployed in each of these data centers.
How should you architect the solution to support this requirement?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium SECRET-SEN Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
LE
Leslie
11 months ago
Definitely need a failover plan, so C is the way to go!
RA
Raylene
11 months ago
Option D could be useful for caching, but not a full solution.
KI
Kirk
11 months ago
Wait, can we really just do nothing with option A? Seems risky!
NE
Nelida
11 months ago
I disagree, option B is simpler and effective enough.
MI
Mitzie
11 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense for auto recovery.
VA
Vallie
12 months ago
I think no changes are needed if the Followers are already set up, but I’m not confident that’s the best solution.
JU
Julieta
12 months ago
I feel like we covered something about caching on Followers, but I can't recall if option D is the right approach for this scenario.
DA
Daron
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think extending the auto failover cluster could be the best way to ensure availability, like option C suggests.
LO
Lorean
1 year ago
I remember discussing the importance of having a backup leader in case the primary goes down, so option B sounds familiar.
AS
Ashley
1 year ago
Yeah, that makes sense. I'd go with option C - extending the auto failover cluster to include Standby instances in each data center. That way, the failover will be automatic and the applications won't experience any downtime.
GA
Gaynell
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The question is asking us to set up a highly available Conjur deployment, so we need to have Standby instances in each data center that can take over as the Leader if the current Leader becomes unavailable. That way, the applications can still access the secrets.
MA
Maile
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between a Follower and a Standby in Conjur. I'll need to review the documentation to make sure I understand the architecture before I can confidently answer this.
LA
Lang
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about ensuring high availability for Conjur. I think the key is to understand the difference between a Follower and a Standby, and how to set up automatic failover.
GA
Galen
1 year ago
I'm all about that Option C life. AuBelenatic recovery is the way to go - no need to manually promote a Standby, that's just asking for trouble.
BE
Belen
1 year ago
Option D, huh? Deploying a CP provider on the Follower server for offline caching? Sounds like a real 'cache in the clouds' kind of move.
CL
Claudio
1 year ago
No changes required? That's a bold choice, Option A. I guess the customer just wants to live life on the edge!
TR
Trina
1 year ago
I think Option B is the way to go. Deploying a Standby in each data center that can be promoted to the Leader role is a simple and straightforward solution.
LE
Leslie
1 year ago
It's a smart move to have redundancy in place by promoting a Standby to Leader in case of any failures.
JA
Jacqueline
1 year ago
Deploying a Standby in each data center for failover seems like the best way to handle the situation if the Conjur Leader goes down.
SA
Samira
1 year ago
Deploying a Standby in each data center is a good strategy for ensuring applications can still retrieve secrets even if the Leader goes down.
HE
Herman
1 year ago
I agree, Option B seems like the most practical solution for ensuring applications can retrieve secrets from Conjur in multiple data centers.
AN
Annice
1 year ago
I agree, it's a reliable solution to have a backup Leader ready to take over if needed.
AN
Annelle
1 year ago
Option B is definitely the best choice. Having a Standby in each data center ensures high availability.
EV
Evelynn
1 year ago
Option B is a good choice. Having a Standby in each data center ready to be promoted to Leader is a solid plan.
WA
Wade
1 year ago
Option C seems like the best solution to me. Extending the auto failover cluster to include Standby in each data center will ensure automatic recovery if the Leader becomes unavailable.
HO
Hoa
1 year ago
Yes, it's important to have redundancy in place to ensure applications can still retrieve secrets from Conjur in case of Leader unavailability.
WE
Weldon
1 year ago
Deploying a CP provider on the Follower server for offline caching might also be a good idea to ensure seamless access to secrets in case of any issues.
BA
Barbra
1 year ago
I agree, having a Standby in each data center for automatic recovery is a good approach.
EL
Ellsworth
1 year ago
I agree, having Standby in each data center for automatic recovery is crucial for ensuring applications can retrieve secrets from Conjur.
MU
Muriel
1 year ago
Option C seems like the best solution to me. Extending the auto failover cluster to include Standby in each data center will ensure automatic recovery if the Leader becomes unavailable.
EF
Effie
1 year ago
Option C seems like the best solution to me. Extending the auto failover cluster to include Standby in each data center will ensure automatic recovery if the Leader becomes unavailable.
LA
Lanie
1 year ago
I'm not sure about option C. I think option B might also work by deploying a Standby in each data center that can be promoted to Leader.
CH
Cherelle
2 years ago
I agree with Elke. Option C provides the most reliable solution for ensuring applications can retrieve secrets from Conjur in multiple data centers.
EL
Elke
2 years ago
I think option C is the best choice because it ensures automatic recovery in case the Leader becomes unavailable.