Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CyberArk PAM-SEN Exam - Topic 5 Question 72 Discussion

A customer is moving from an on-premises to a public cloud deployment.What is the best and most cost-effective option to secure the server key?
C) Install the Vault using the native cloud images and secure the server key using native cloud Key Management Systems.
A) Install the Vault in the cloud the same way you would in an on-premises environment. Place the server key in a password protected folder on the operating system.
B) Install the Vault in the cloud the same way you would in an on-premises environment. Purchase a Hardware Security Module to secure the server key.
D) Install the Vault using the native cloud images and secure the server key with a Hardware Security Module.

CyberArk PAM-SEN Exam - Topic 5 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's PAM-SEN exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 5
[All PAM-SEN Questions]

A customer is moving from an on-premises to a public cloud deployment.

What is the best and most cost-effective option to secure the server key?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Wenona at Apr 08, 2026, 01:41 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PAM-SEN Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Alison
True, but option B is expensive. Why spend more?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
5 days ago
But what about security? A Hardware Security Module is more secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
10 days ago
Agreed! It's cost-effective and integrates well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
15 days ago
I think option C is the best. Native cloud KMS is designed for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
21 days ago
Honestly, I think A could work if you manage it right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
26 days ago
D is overkill, just stick with C for cost-effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
1 month ago
Surprised that people still consider A, it's not secure enough for cloud!
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
1 month ago
I disagree, B seems safer with a Hardware Security Module.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
1 month ago
C is the way to go, native cloud KMS is super efficient!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
2 months ago
D sounds overkill for most use cases, honestly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zachary
2 months ago
Native cloud KMS is usually cheaper and easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
2 months ago
Surprised that people still think A is a good option!
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
3 months ago
I disagree, B seems more secure with the HSM.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
4 months ago
C is definitely the way to go for cloud environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
4 months ago
I’m torn between A and C. A seems too basic, but I wonder if C might be too reliant on the cloud provider's tools.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where using native cloud Key Management Systems was highlighted as a best practice. I think C could be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like using a Hardware Security Module in option B or D might be overkill for cost-effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
5 months ago
I think option C sounds familiar, especially since it mentions using native cloud images. I remember reading that cloud providers have built-in security features.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel