Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CyberArk PAM-SEN Exam - Topic 4 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's PAM-SEN exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 4
[All PAM-SEN Questions]

A customer has three data centers distributed globally and wants highly-available PSM connections in each segmented zone. In addition, the customer needs a highly-available PSM connection for the CyberArk Admins.

What will best satisfy this customer's needs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Dulce at Sep 14, 2024, 01:54 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PAM-SEN Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Aliza
5 months ago
I think B is overkill, one PSM for Admins should be enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
5 months ago
Definitely leaning towards A, that setup looks efficient for admins.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
5 months ago
Wait, is six PSMs in one data center really a good idea? Sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
5 months ago
I disagree, three PSMs per zone (Option D) would provide better redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
6 months ago
Option C seems solid, two PSMs per zone is a good balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
6 months ago
I feel like option A might be too simple for their needs. They definitely need more redundancy for the Admins, but I’m torn between A and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
6 months ago
Option D seems like overkill with three PSMs per zone, but I guess it could ensure high availability. I’m not confident that’s necessary though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
6 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where load balancing was crucial, but I can't recall if we needed one or two for the Admins.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrinne
6 months ago
I think option C sounds right because having two PSMs per zone would provide redundancy, but I'm not completely sure about the load balancer setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C. Having two PSMs per zone with a dedicated load balancer for the admins seems like the most robust and flexible solution to meet all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
6 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. We need highly available PSM connections in each data center zone, so that rules out option B. And we need redundancy for the admin access, so that points to either option A or C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the load balancing requirements here. Do we need a dedicated load balancer for the admin access or can we use the same load balancers as the data center zones?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
7 months ago
This seems like a straightforward high availability question. I think the key is to ensure redundancy in both the data center zones and the admin access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll have to review my notes and try to remember the differences between these networking concepts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
2 years ago
Why not just hire a few interns to manually monitor and switch between the PSMs? That's the most cost-effective solution, right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
Donte
1 year ago
D: Using CyberArk's built-in load balancing feature can help streamline the process and ensure efficient distribution of traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
1 year ago
C: It's important to have redundancy and failover mechanisms in place to prevent any downtime or disruptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
1 year ago
B: I agree, having multiple PSMs with load balancers ensures continuous access and better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
1 year ago
A: That might work for a small setup, but for a global distribution with high availability needs, automated load balancing is more reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bo
2 years ago
Hmm, six PSMs in one data center? That's a lot of hardware! I'd go with option C to keep things distributed and redundant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
2 years ago
I think option D is the simplest and most elegant solution. Let CyberArk's built-in load balancing handle it all.
upvoted 0 times
Stevie
1 year ago
It definitely simplifies the setup and management process. Option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
1 year ago
I agree, having three PSMs per zone with built-in load balancing seems like a reliable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
1 year ago
Option D sounds like the best choice. Let CyberArk handle the load balancing for each zone.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dulce
2 years ago
Hmm, that's a good point. I see the benefits of both options C and D now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
2 years ago
Option C is the way to go! Load balancing in each zone and for the admins is the best way to ensure high availability.
upvoted 0 times
Dierdre
1 year ago
Definitely, it's important to have redundancy and load balancing in place for highly-available PSM connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
1 year ago
I agree, having two PSMs per zone with a load balancer and two PSMs for Admins with a dedicated load balancer covers all bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evan
2 years ago
Option C is the way to go! Load balancing in each zone and for the admins is the best way to ensure high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Martha
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option D with CyberArk built-in load balancing is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
2 years ago
You know, option A has a certain charm to it. One PSM per zone with a load balancer? Elegant and efficient. I like it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
2 years ago
Oh man, I can already see the IT team high-fiving each other if they go with option D. Built-in load balancing? That's some serious laziness-reducing technology right there!
upvoted 0 times
Tonette
1 year ago
The IT team will definitely appreciate the simplicity and efficiency of option D. It's a win-win for everyone involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
2 years ago
It's definitely a smart choice for the customer. They'll have highly-available PSM connections without the need for additional load balancers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
2 years ago
I agree, having three PSMs per zone with built-in load balancing for the CyberArk Admins is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
2 years ago
Option D sounds like the best choice. Built-in load balancing will definitely make things easier for the IT team.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dulce
2 years ago
I think option C would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanja
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about having six PSMs in the main data center. Seems a bit overkill, don't you think? I'd go for option C.
upvoted 0 times
Teddy
1 year ago
Definitely, it's important to find the right balance between redundancy and efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanjuana
2 years ago
Yeah, that way the customer's needs for highly-available PSM connections in each segmented zone and for the CyberArk Admins are both met.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
2 years ago
I agree, having two PSMs per zone with a load balancer and two PSMs for Admins with a dedicated load balancer seems like a good balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
2 years ago
Option C sounds like the best choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alline
2 years ago
Option C looks like the perfect solution. Redundancy in each zone and dedicated load balancing for the admins? That's what I call high availability!
upvoted 0 times
Bettina
2 years ago
I agree, having two PSMs per zone with a load balancer and two PSMs for Admins with a dedicated load balancer provides the necessary redundancy and high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
2 years ago
Option C does seem like the best choice. Redundancy in each zone and dedicated load balancing for the admins is key for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel