Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CyberArk PAM-SEN Exam - Topic 1 Question 50 Discussion

Posted by Marcelle on Oct 18, 2024 at 08:24 PM

A customer has two data centers and requires a single PVWA url.

Which deployment provides the fastest time to reach the PVWA and the most redundancy?

Suggested Answer: A, B

Get Premium PAM-SEN Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
LU
Luis 11 months ago
Wait, why would anyone choose C? That seems risky.
WI
Willard 11 months ago
I agree with A, global traffic managers are great!
ET
Ethan 11 months ago
A sounds right, but can it handle high traffic?
DO
Dorian 11 months ago
I think B is simpler, but not as reliable.
IS
Isadora 11 months ago
Option A is definitely the best for redundancy!
EM
Emeline 12 months ago
I feel like active/standby setups are good for redundancy, but I’m not sure if they’re as fast as using a global traffic manager. I might lean towards A.
AL
Allene 12 months ago
I practiced a similar question where DNS round robin was mentioned, but I’m not confident it provides the best redundancy. Could option D be risky?
WI
Wilford 12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think deploying one PVWA could lead to a single point of failure. So, maybe option C is safer?
CA
Caprice 1 year ago
I remember studying about global traffic managers and how they can help with redundancy and speed. I think option A might be the best choice.
ME
Meghan 1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of this question. What exactly do they mean by "fastest time to reach the PVWA"? Is that based on network latency or something else? I'll need to think this through carefully.
JO
Joaquin 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to provide the fastest access and the most redundancy. I think deploying two PVWAs behind a global traffic manager is the way to go - that will give me the best of both worlds.
TA
Tamekia 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between these options. I'll need to review the details of global traffic managers, active/standby modes, and DNS round robin to figure out the best approach.
MA
Maddie 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about PVWA deployment options. I'll need to think through the pros and cons of each approach to determine the fastest and most redundant solution.
MA
Matthew 1 year ago
I hope the global traffic manager in option A comes with a complimentary crystal ball to predict traffic patterns. Otherwise, it's just a fancy paperweight.
IL
Ilene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Matthew
Option D might work well if the data centers are evenly balanced.
ID
Idella 1 year ago
↳ replying to Matthew
I think option C would provide the fastest time to reach the PVWA.
LA
Lakeesha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Matthew
But wouldn't it be simpler to just go with option B?
ST
Stefany 1 year ago
↳ replying to Matthew
Option A sounds like the best choice for redundancy.
RE
Renato 1 year ago
D? Really? DNS round robin? That's like putting a Band-Aid on a broken leg. Might as well just flip a coin to decide which PVWA to use.
HA
Haydee 1 year ago
Hmm, C could be a good compromise between redundancy and simplicity. As long as the active/standby switchover is fast enough, that might be the way to go.
BA
Bambi 1 year ago
↳ replying to Haydee
User 3: Yeah, as long as the switchover is quick, it seems like a solid choice.
DE
Denae 1 year ago
↳ replying to Haydee
User 2: Agreed, having two PVWAs in active/standby mode could provide the best of both worlds.
LE
Leonard 1 year ago
↳ replying to Haydee
User 1: I think C is a good option for balancing redundancy and simplicity.
HO
Howard 1 year ago
B is the simplest solution, but a single point of failure doesn't seem very redundant. Gotta weigh the pros and cons here.
IL
Ilene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Howard
B is the simplest solution, but a single point of failure doesn't seem very redundant. Gotta weigh the pros and cons here.
AM
Amie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Howard
C) Deploy two PVWAs in an active/standby mode.
AN
Antione 1 year ago
↳ replying to Howard
A) Deploy two PVWAs behind a global traffic manager.
MA
Marleen 1 year ago
Option A sounds promising, but I'm not sure how much of a performance boost a global traffic manager would provide. Seems like overkill for just two data centers.
LU
Luisa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marleen
I'm not sure, but deploying one PVWA only seems like the simplest option.
RE
Ressie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marleen
But wouldn't deploying two PVWAs behind a global traffic manager also provide redundancy and faster access?
MI
Miesha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marleen
I think deploying two PVWAs in an active/standby mode would provide the most redundancy.
YU
Yuette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marleen
Option A sounds promising, but I'm not sure how much of a performance boost a global traffic manager would provide. Seems like overkill for just two data centers.
LA
Larae 2 years ago
I see both points, but I think deploying one PVWA only might be simpler and still provide adequate access to the PVWA.
DO
Dominic 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe deploying two PVWAs in an active/standby mode would provide the most redundancy in case of failure.
HO
Holley 2 years ago
I think deploying two PVWAs behind a global traffic manager would be the best option for fast access and redundancy.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel