Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CyberArk PAM-SEN Exam - Topic 1 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's PAM-SEN exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 1
[All PAM-SEN Questions]

A customer has two data centers and requires a single PVWA url.

Which deployment provides the fastest time to reach the PVWA and the most redundancy?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

by Marcelle at Oct 18, 2024, 08:24 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PAM-SEN Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Luis
4 months ago
Wait, why would anyone choose C? That seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
5 months ago
I agree with A, global traffic managers are great!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
5 months ago
A sounds right, but can it handle high traffic?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorian
5 months ago
I think B is simpler, but not as reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
5 months ago
Option A is definitely the best for redundancy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
6 months ago
I feel like active/standby setups are good for redundancy, but I’m not sure if they’re as fast as using a global traffic manager. I might lean towards A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question where DNS round robin was mentioned, but I’m not confident it provides the best redundancy. Could option D be risky?
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilford
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think deploying one PVWA could lead to a single point of failure. So, maybe option C is safer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
6 months ago
I remember studying about global traffic managers and how they can help with redundancy and speed. I think option A might be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghan
6 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of this question. What exactly do they mean by "fastest time to reach the PVWA"? Is that based on network latency or something else? I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
6 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to provide the fastest access and the most redundancy. I think deploying two PVWAs behind a global traffic manager is the way to go - that will give me the best of both worlds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between these options. I'll need to review the details of global traffic managers, active/standby modes, and DNS round robin to figure out the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
6 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about PVWA deployment options. I'll need to think through the pros and cons of each approach to determine the fastest and most redundant solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
11 months ago
I hope the global traffic manager in option A comes with a complimentary crystal ball to predict traffic patterns. Otherwise, it's just a fancy paperweight.
upvoted 0 times
Ilene
9 months ago
Option D might work well if the data centers are evenly balanced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
10 months ago
I think option C would provide the fastest time to reach the PVWA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
10 months ago
But wouldn't it be simpler to just go with option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
10 months ago
Option A sounds like the best choice for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Renato
11 months ago
D? Really? DNS round robin? That's like putting a Band-Aid on a broken leg. Might as well just flip a coin to decide which PVWA to use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
11 months ago
Hmm, C could be a good compromise between redundancy and simplicity. As long as the active/standby switchover is fast enough, that might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Bambi
10 months ago
User 3: Yeah, as long as the switchover is quick, it seems like a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
10 months ago
User 2: Agreed, having two PVWAs in active/standby mode could provide the best of both worlds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
11 months ago
User 1: I think C is a good option for balancing redundancy and simplicity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Howard
12 months ago
B is the simplest solution, but a single point of failure doesn't seem very redundant. Gotta weigh the pros and cons here.
upvoted 0 times
Ilene
10 months ago
B is the simplest solution, but a single point of failure doesn't seem very redundant. Gotta weigh the pros and cons here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
11 months ago
C) Deploy two PVWAs in an active/standby mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antione
11 months ago
A) Deploy two PVWAs behind a global traffic manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marleen
12 months ago
Option A sounds promising, but I'm not sure how much of a performance boost a global traffic manager would provide. Seems like overkill for just two data centers.
upvoted 0 times
Luisa
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but deploying one PVWA only seems like the simplest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
11 months ago
But wouldn't deploying two PVWAs behind a global traffic manager also provide redundancy and faster access?
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
11 months ago
I think deploying two PVWAs in an active/standby mode would provide the most redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
11 months ago
Option A sounds promising, but I'm not sure how much of a performance boost a global traffic manager would provide. Seems like overkill for just two data centers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Larae
1 year ago
I see both points, but I think deploying one PVWA only might be simpler and still provide adequate access to the PVWA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominic
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe deploying two PVWAs in an active/standby mode would provide the most redundancy in case of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
1 year ago
I think deploying two PVWAs behind a global traffic manager would be the best option for fast access and redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel