Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

CyberArk PAM-SEN Exam - Topic 1 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's PAM-SEN exam

Question #: 50
Topic #: 1

[All PAM-SEN Questions]

A customer has two data centers and requires a single PVWA url.

Which deployment provides the fastest time to reach the PVWA and the most redundancy?

ADeploy two PVWAs behind a global traffic manager.

BDeploy one PVWA only.

CDeploy two PVWAs in an active/standby mode.

DDeploy two PVWAs using DNS round robin.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, B

by Marcelle at Oct 18, 2024, 08:24 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PAM-SEN Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Luis

6 months ago

Wait, why would anyone choose C? That seems risky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willard

6 months ago

I agree with A, global traffic managers are great!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ethan

7 months ago

A sounds right, but can it handle high traffic?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorian

7 months ago

I think B is simpler, but not as reliable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isadora

7 months ago

Option A is definitely the best for redundancy!

upvoted 0 times

...

Emeline

7 months ago

I feel like active/standby setups are good for redundancy, but I’m not sure if they’re as fast as using a global traffic manager. I might lean towards A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

8 months ago

I practiced a similar question where DNS round robin was mentioned, but I’m not confident it provides the best redundancy. Could option D be risky?

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilford

8 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think deploying one PVWA could lead to a single point of failure. So, maybe option C is safer?

upvoted 0 times

...

Caprice

8 months ago

I remember studying about global traffic managers and how they can help with redundancy and speed. I think option A might be the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Meghan

8 months ago

I'm a little confused by the wording of this question. What exactly do they mean by "fastest time to reach the PVWA"? Is that based on network latency or something else? I'll need to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joaquin

8 months ago

Okay, I've got this. The key is to provide the fastest access and the most redundancy. I think deploying two PVWAs behind a global traffic manager is the way to go - that will give me the best of both worlds.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamekia

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between these options. I'll need to review the details of global traffic managers, active/standby modes, and DNS round robin to figure out the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maddie

8 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about PVWA deployment options. I'll need to think through the pros and cons of each approach to determine the fastest and most redundant solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Matthew

1 year ago

I hope the global traffic manager in option A comes with a complimentary crystal ball to predict traffic patterns. Otherwise, it's just a fancy paperweight.

upvoted 0 times

Ilene

11 months ago

Option D might work well if the data centers are evenly balanced.

upvoted 0 times

...

Idella

12 months ago

I think option C would provide the fastest time to reach the PVWA.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lakeesha

12 months ago

But wouldn't it be simpler to just go with option B?

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefany

12 months ago

Option A sounds like the best choice for redundancy.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Renato

1 year ago

D? Really? DNS round robin? That's like putting a Band-Aid on a broken leg. Might as well just flip a coin to decide which PVWA to use.

upvoted 0 times

...

Haydee

1 year ago

Hmm, C could be a good compromise between redundancy and simplicity. As long as the active/standby switchover is fast enough, that might be the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Bambi

12 months ago

User 3: Yeah, as long as the switchover is quick, it seems like a solid choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denae

1 year ago

User 2: Agreed, having two PVWAs in active/standby mode could provide the best of both worlds.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonard

1 year ago

User 1: I think C is a good option for balancing redundancy and simplicity.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Howard

1 year ago

B is the simplest solution, but a single point of failure doesn't seem very redundant. Gotta weigh the pros and cons here.

upvoted 0 times

Ilene

1 year ago

B is the simplest solution, but a single point of failure doesn't seem very redundant. Gotta weigh the pros and cons here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amie

1 year ago

C) Deploy two PVWAs in an active/standby mode.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antione

1 year ago

A) Deploy two PVWAs behind a global traffic manager.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Marleen

1 year ago

Option A sounds promising, but I'm not sure how much of a performance boost a global traffic manager would provide. Seems like overkill for just two data centers.

upvoted 0 times

Luisa

1 year ago

I'm not sure, but deploying one PVWA only seems like the simplest option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ressie

1 year ago

But wouldn't deploying two PVWAs behind a global traffic manager also provide redundancy and faster access?

upvoted 0 times

...

Miesha

1 year ago

I think deploying two PVWAs in an active/standby mode would provide the most redundancy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuette

1 year ago

Option A sounds promising, but I'm not sure how much of a performance boost a global traffic manager would provide. Seems like overkill for just two data centers.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Larae

1 year ago

I see both points, but I think deploying one PVWA only might be simpler and still provide adequate access to the PVWA.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominic

1 year ago

I disagree, I believe deploying two PVWAs in an active/standby mode would provide the most redundancy in case of failure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Holley

1 year ago

I think deploying two PVWAs behind a global traffic manager would be the best option for fast access and redundancy.

upvoted 0 times

...