Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CyberArk Exam PAM-SEN Topic 1 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's PAM-SEN exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 1
[All PAM-SEN Questions]

All 80 employees from your satellite Tokyo office are complaining that browsing the PVWA site is very slow; however, your New York headquarters users are not experiencing this. The current PAM solution is:

2 distributed Vaults, the primary one in New York and a satellite in Tokyo

2 PVWA servers, both in New York with load balancing configured

2 PSM servers, both in New York without load balancing configured

1 CPM server in New York

All PVWA, PSM, and CPM servers are connected to the primary Vault

Which proposal optimally resolves the performance issue while minimizing the impact to production?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

by Zena at May 20, 2024, 03:11 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PAM-SEN Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Destiny
20 days ago
I bet the Tokyo office is just trying to watch anime during work hours. That's the real reason for the slow browsing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
21 days ago
Why not just install a new PVWA server in Tokyo and call it a day? Seems like a lot of effort for 80 employees. 'Upgrade' the Tokyo office to a vending machine and call it a day.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
1 months ago
Option D is an interesting approach, but it might be overkill for this particular issue. Migrating to a Primary-DR architecture is a significant change that could have broader implications.
upvoted 0 times
Jesusita
27 days ago
A) Install two new PVWA servers in Tokyo data center, configure load balancing, connect to the local satellite Vault and provide the URL of new PVWA servers to the local employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carri
1 months ago
Option C doesn't seem to address the core problem, which is the slow browsing of the PVWA site. Installing more PSM servers in Tokyo won't help with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
2 months ago
I'm not sure about Option B. Connecting the Tokyo PVWA servers to the New York vault could introduce additional latency and other issues. It might be better to keep the local infrastructure in Tokyo.
upvoted 0 times
Ahmad
18 days ago
I agree, keeping the infrastructure local in Tokyo would likely provide better performance for the employees there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
1 months ago
A) Install two new PVWA servers in Tokyo data center, configure load balancing, connect to the local satellite Vault and provide the URL of new PVWA servers to the local employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominque
2 months ago
I see both points, but I think option C could work too by focusing on the PSM servers in Tokyo.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
2 months ago
Option A seems like the most straightforward solution. Installing PVWA servers in Tokyo and connecting them to the local satellite vault should resolve the performance issue for the employees there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonell
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is better because it also changes the architecture for better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
2 months ago
I think option A is the best solution. It directly addresses the performance issue in Tokyo.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel