When adding the EPM agent to a pre-existing security stack on workstation, what two steps are CyberArk recommendations. (Choose two.)
Suggested Answer: A, B
Get Premium EPM-DEF Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
20 comments · newest first
MI
Mireya
1 month ago
C seems unnecessary. We need flexibility with tools.
YE
Yesenia
1 month ago
I agree with A, but D could be useful too.
AN
Annice
2 months ago
Definitely A and B. They help avoid conflicts.
CA
Carin
2 months ago
A makes sense, but I’m unsure about B.
JO
Jolanda
2 months ago
I feel like C is too strict.
DU
Dusti
2 months ago
I think A and B are the best options.
MA
Maryann
2 months ago
Not sure about this... running EPM with other tools sounds risky!
GL
Glynda
3 months ago
I thought we needed advanced policies for everything, but A and B make sense.
PA
Paz
3 months ago
Wait, EPM can't run with other tools? That seems odd.
CL
Clay
3 months ago
Totally agree with A and B!
CA
Carma
3 months ago
A) and B) are the right steps!
CH
Chery
3 months ago
Just to clarify, is it really safe to run EPM with other tools?
JE
Jerry
3 months ago
I thought D) was necessary too, but I guess not!
MA
Marsha
4 months ago
Wait, C) seems a bit extreme, right?
SH
Shawnee
5 months ago
Totally agree with that!
BR
Britt
5 months ago
A) and B) are the right steps!
LO
Louann
6 months ago
I feel like we discussed creating advanced policies, but I’m not sure if that’s necessary for this specific scenario. It’s a bit confusing!
TA
Tamra
6 months ago
I’m pretty confident that we should never run the EPM agent with other security tools, but I can't recall if that was a recommendation or just a caution.
DI
Diane
6 months ago
I remember something about ignoring pre-existing security applications, so maybe it's option A? It feels familiar from our practice questions.
QU
Quentin
6 months ago
I think one of the steps is to add the EPM agent to the other security tools exclusions, but I'm not entirely sure about the second one.