New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CyberArk EPM-DEF Exam - Topic 3 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's EPM-DEF exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 3
[All EPM-DEF Questions]

An EPM Administrator would like to enable a Threat Protection policy, however, the policy protects an application that is not installed on all endpoints.

What should the EPM Administrator do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Wade at Sep 16, 2024, 03:06 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium EPM-DEF Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Floyd
3 months ago
Isn't it risky to enable it if the app isn't on all endpoints?
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
3 months ago
Definitely don't skip enabling it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
3 months ago
Wait, can you really run it in Detect mode only?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
4 months ago
I think option D makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
4 months ago
Just enable the policy and set the targets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards not enabling the policy at all, but I can’t recall the exact implications of that choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
4 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like splitting the endpoints might be the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryll
4 months ago
I think enabling it in Detect mode could be a safer option, but I’m not entirely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
5 months ago
I remember something about configuring policy targets, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident that Option D is the way to go here. Splitting the endpoints into separate sets and only enabling the Threat Protection policy for the set with the application installed seems like the most targeted and effective solution. The other options just don't seem to address the core issue of the policy protecting something that's not universally installed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
5 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. The policy is protecting an application that's not installed on all endpoints, so we need to find a way to target it properly. Option A is too broad, and Option B doesn't do anything. I think Option D, splitting the endpoints into separate sets, is the best approach here. That way, we can enable the policy for the set of endpoints that have the application installed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfriede
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if enabling the policy in Detect mode (Option C) would be enough, since it might still cause issues for the endpoints without the application. Option D about splitting the endpoints into separate sets sounds like a good strategy, but I'd want to make sure I understand how that would work in practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shay
5 months ago
I think the key here is to consider the fact that the policy protects an application that isn't installed on all endpoints. Option A seems too risky, as it could cause issues for the endpoints without the application. Option B is safe but doesn't really solve the problem. I'm leaning towards Option C or D, as they seem to offer a more targeted approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I think the key is to identify the main purpose of the Asynchronous Queuing pattern, which is to provide a buffer between the service and its consumer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
1 year ago
Hmm, I'd say option D is the winner. Gotta keep those endpoints safe, but also gotta make sure the policy actually works, right?
upvoted 0 times
Kyoko
1 year ago
Definitely, better to be safe than sorry when it comes to endpoint security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
1 year ago
Good point! It's important to ensure the policy is effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
1 year ago
D) Split up the endpoints in to separate Sets and enable Threat Protection for only one of the Sets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
1 year ago
A) Enable the Threat Protection policy and configure the Policy Targets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stanford
1 year ago
Ha! Option A is like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Good luck with that, EPM Administrator!
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
1 year ago
Option B is the way to go. If the policy doesn't protect all endpoints, it's best not to enable it at all. Wouldn't want any unexpected problems, you know?
upvoted 0 times
William
1 year ago
C) Enable the Threat Protection policy only in Detect mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
1 year ago
B) Do not enable the Threat Protection policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
1 year ago
A) Enable the Threat Protection policy and configure the Policy Targets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mozelle
1 year ago
I'm going with option C. Enabling the Threat Protection policy in Detect mode seems like a good way to test it without causing any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
1 year ago
Definitely option D. Splitting the endpoints into separate sets and enabling Threat Protection for only one set makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the EPM Admin is wishing they had a crystal ball to see which endpoints have the app installed. Option A sounds like a recipe for disaster!
upvoted 0 times
Roxanne
1 year ago
C) Enable the Threat Protection policy only in Detect mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
1 year ago
B) Do not enable the Threat Protection policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
1 year ago
A) Enable the Threat Protection policy and configure the Policy Targets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherell
1 year ago
I disagree. I think the EPM Administrator should split up the endpoints into separate Sets and enable Threat Protection for only one of the Sets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
1 year ago
B all the way, man. Don't enable that policy if it's not gonna work for everyone. Why bother, right? Keep it simple, keep it safe.
upvoted 0 times
Carlene
1 year ago
D) Split up the endpoints in to separate Sets and enable Threat Protection for only one of the Sets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
1 year ago
B) Do not enable the Threat Protection policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
1 year ago
A) Enable the Threat Protection policy and configure the Policy Targets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elke
1 year ago
I agree with Valentine. It's important to protect the endpoints that have the application installed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
1 year ago
I'd go with C. Detect mode is a good way to test the Threat Protection policy without impacting all the endpoints. Gotta be strategic about these things, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Ellsworth
1 year ago
D) Split up the endpoints in to separate Sets and enable Threat Protection for only one of the Sets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emiko
1 year ago
That's a good point. Testing in Detect mode first is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
1 year ago
C) Enable the Threat Protection policy only in Detect mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
1 year ago
A) Enable the Threat Protection policy and configure the Policy Targets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Karon
1 year ago
Option D is the way to go! Splitting up the endpoints into separate sets and enabling the Threat Protection for one of them is a smart move. Keeps things organized and under control.
upvoted 0 times
Gabriele
1 year ago
That sounds like a good plan. It's important to have control over which endpoints have the Threat Protection policy enabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
1 year ago
Option D is the way to go! Splitting up the endpoints into separate sets and enabling the Threat Protection for one of them is a smart move. Keeps things organized and under control.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valentine
1 year ago
I think the EPM Administrator should enable the Threat Protection policy and configure the Policy Targets.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel