CyberArk EPM-DEF Exam - Topic 1 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's EPM-DEF exam

Question #: 27
Topic #: 1

An EPM Administrator would like to include a particular file extension to be monitored and protected under Ransomware Protection. What setting should the EPM Administrator configure to add the extension?

AAuthorized Applications (Ransomware Protection)

BFiles to be Ignored Always

CAnti-tampering Protection

DDefault Policies

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Noel at May 22, 2024, 03:39 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium EPM-DEF Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Vivan

10 months ago

A is correct! You need to authorize those apps.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rashida

10 months ago

Wait, can you really add extensions under Ransomware Protection like that?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lajuana

10 months ago

A is the only option that makes sense here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesus

11 months ago

I think A is right, but what about D?

upvoted 0 times

...

Twana

11 months ago

Definitely go with A for monitoring file extensions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maia

11 months ago

I’m pretty confident that A is the correct option since it relates directly to authorized applications for ransomware protection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Andrew

11 months ago

I’m leaning towards B because it seems like it would make sense to ignore certain files, but I could be mixing it up with another topic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cristal

11 months ago

I remember practicing a similar question about file monitoring, and I feel like Default Policies could be the right choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaime

12 months ago

I think the answer might be A, but I'm not completely sure if that's the right setting for adding file extensions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Verdell

12 months ago

The way I see it, the Authorized Applications (Ransomware Protection) setting is the most likely answer here. That's where you can specify which file extensions to monitor and protect against ransomware.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolande

12 months ago

I'm a bit confused on this one. Is it possible that the "Files to be Ignored Always" setting could be used to add the file extension? I'll have to review the material again.

upvoted 0 times

...

Buck

12 months ago

Okay, let me see. The question is asking about adding a file extension to be monitored for ransomware, so I'm pretty confident the answer is Authorized Applications (Ransomware Protection).

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorean

12 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. Maybe it has something to do with the Anti-tampering Protection setting?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ty

12 months ago

I think the answer is Authorized Applications (Ransomware Protection). That's where you can configure file extensions to be monitored and protected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Odelia

12 months ago

I'm a bit confused on the differences between the redo log, rollback log, and binary log. I'll need to review those concepts before answering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emeline

12 months ago

This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Derick

12 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the registry stores a lot of system configuration, but I can't quite remember where the file extension mappings are kept. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willodean

1 year ago

I feel pretty confident that the Logic App to Azure Blob storage is the way to go here. That would allow you to quickly ingest the emails and then have other processes handle them, without slowing down the initial response time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tegan

1 year ago

Who needs EPM when you can just use a trusty roll of duct tape to protect your files? Just tape them shut and call it a day!

upvoted 0 times

Tien

1 year ago

C) Anti-tampering Protection

upvoted 0 times

...

Ilene

1 year ago

B) Files to be Ignored Always

upvoted 0 times

...

Micheline

1 year ago

A) Authorized Applications (Ransomware Protection)

upvoted 0 times

...

Na

1 year ago

Nah, I'm going with B. Files to be Ignored Always. That way, the file extension will be completely off the radar, and the ransomware won't even know it's there!

upvoted 0 times

Mi

1 year ago

User 3: I see your points, but I'm sticking with B) Files to be Ignored Always. It seems like the safest option to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emilio

1 year ago

User 2: I disagree, I believe C) Anti-tampering Protection is the best choice. It adds an extra layer of security for the extension.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amie

1 year ago

User 1: I think A) Authorized Applications is the way to go. It specifically allows certain extensions to be protected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilford

1 year ago

Ha! I bet the answer is actually D. Default Policies. That's where all the juicy settings are hidden, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Salome

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Maybe C. Anti-tampering Protection could also work, just to be extra safe.

upvoted 0 times

Raylene

1 year ago

C) Anti-tampering Protection sounds like a good option too

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherita

1 year ago

I would go with D) Default Policies to be safe

upvoted 0 times

...

Louis

1 year ago

I think it's A) Authorized Applications (Ransomware Protection)

upvoted 0 times

...

Carline

1 year ago

I think the answer is A. Authorized Applications (Ransomware Protection) seems like the logical choice to add a file extension for monitoring and protection.

upvoted 0 times