Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CWNP CWSP-207 Exam - Topic 2 Question 7 Discussion

You must locate non-compliant 802.11 devices. Which one of the following tools will you use and why?
D) A protocol analyzer, because it can be used to report on security settings and regulatory or rule compliance
A) A spectrum analyzer, because it can show the energy footprint of a device using WPA differently from a device using WPA2.
B) A spectrum analyzer, because it can decode the PHY preamble of a non-compliant device.
C) A protocol analyzer, because it can be used to view the spectrum energy of non-compliant 802.11 devices, which is always different from compliant devices.

CWNP CWSP-207 Exam - Topic 2 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWSP-207 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 2
[All CWSP-207 Questions]

You must locate non-compliant 802.11 devices. Which one of the following tools will you use and why?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Tamar at Jun 28, 2024, 03:30 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CWSP-207 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tamra
9 months ago
Just to clarify, non-compliant devices can be tricky to spot!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
9 months ago
I think option D makes more sense for compliance checks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
10 months ago
Wait, can a spectrum analyzer really show WPA vs WPA2 differences?
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
10 months ago
I disagree, a protocol analyzer gives more detailed insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
10 months ago
A spectrum analyzer is definitely the way to go for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
10 months ago
I feel like a spectrum analyzer is useful for seeing how devices operate in the spectrum, but I’m not confident if it can actually decode anything like the PHY preamble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D because it mentions security settings, which seems crucial for identifying non-compliant devices, but I could be mixing it up with another topic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eura
11 months ago
I remember practicing with a similar question, and I think a spectrum analyzer is better for detecting the energy footprint of devices, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
11 months ago
I think a protocol analyzer might be the right choice since it can provide insights into compliance issues, but I'm not entirely sure how it compares to a spectrum analyzer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
11 months ago
Definitely going with the spectrum analyzer for this one. It can show the differences in energy footprint between WPA and WPA2 devices, which should help identify any non-compliant hardware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andree
11 months ago
I'm a bit unsure on this one. I know a spectrum analyzer can decode the PHY preamble, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach for finding non-compliant 802.11 devices. Might need to do some more research on the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I think I'd go with a spectrum analyzer since it can show the energy footprint of different devices, which could help identify non-compliant 802.11 devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
11 months ago
A protocol analyzer might be the way to go here. It can give you detailed information on security settings and compliance, which could be really useful for spotting non-compliant devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a straightforward question about 5G latency requirements. I'll need to think carefully about the options and choose the best one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
11 months ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. Should I be looking at the sip-port or the sip-interface? I want to make sure I get this right on the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
2 years ago
I'm all about that protocol analyzer action. Gotta get those rule-breakers on the radar, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Valentin
2 years ago
I'm with you on that! Protocol analyzers are the way to go for catching those rule-breakers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
2 years ago
D) A protocol analyzer, because it can be used to report on security settings and regulatory or rule compliance
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
2 years ago
B) A spectrum analyzer, because it can decode the PHY preamble of a non-compliant device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
2 years ago
A) A spectrum analyzer, because it can show the energy footprint of a device using WPA differently from a device using WPA2.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sena
2 years ago
D sounds solid to me. Reporting on security settings and compliance - that's where it's at.
upvoted 0 times
Marquetta
2 years ago
Definitely, we need to stay on top of security and regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. It's important to make sure all devices are compliant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
2 years ago
I think D is the best option. It can report on security settings and compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Son
2 years ago
Definitely, D is the way to go for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
2 years ago
Yeah, being able to report on security settings and compliance is crucial in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
2 years ago
I agree, D seems like the best option for locating non-compliant devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lewis
2 years ago
I would go with a protocol analyzer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawanna
2 years ago
Because it can show the energy footprint of a device using WPA differently from a device using WPA2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
2 years ago
Why do you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
2 years ago
Gotta love a good spectrum analyzer. It's like x-raying the airwaves for non-compliant devices!
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
2 years ago
B is the way to go! Decoding that PHY preamble is the key to finding those rogue devices.
upvoted 0 times
Lawanda
2 years ago
Sounds like using a spectrum analyzer is the way to go to track down those rogue devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
2 years ago
I think I'll go with option B as well, decoding the preamble seems like the most effective method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
2 years ago
Definitely, it's the best way to locate non-compliant 802.11 devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
2 years ago
I agree, using a spectrum analyzer to decode the PHY preamble is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tawanna
2 years ago
I think I would use a spectrum analyzer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel