Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CWNP Exam CWSP-207 Topic 1 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWSP-207 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 1
[All CWSP-207 Questions]

As a part of a large organization's security policy, how should a wireless security professional address the problem of rogue access points?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Ula at Jan 13, 2025, 01:18 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CWSP-207 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Marylyn
2 months ago
Choosing the right answer is like navigating a minefield. But with a WIPS, you can just blow up the rogue APs and walk away unscathed. D all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
2 months ago
Enabling port security on Ethernet switches? That's like trying to stop a tank with a pea shooter. A WIPS is the way to go, definitely option D.
upvoted 0 times
Talia
23 days ago
Using port security on Ethernet switches may not be enough to address rogue APs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
29 days ago
I agree, it's important to have a trained employee install and configure it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
30 days ago
WIPS is definitely the best option for rogue access points.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lindsey
2 months ago
C is an interesting approach, but who has time to manually scan the entire facility with a spectrum analyzer? I think D is the most practical solution here.
upvoted 0 times
Teri
1 months ago
Manual scans with spectrum analyzers can be time-consuming, so having a trained employee install and configure a WIPS is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luann
1 months ago
Using a WIPS for rogue detection and response measures is crucial in maintaining network security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherill
2 months ago
I agree, D is definitely the most practical solution for detecting rogue access points.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cristal
3 months ago
Hiding the SSID is like trying to hide a giant billboard. Doesn't really work, does it? I'd go with D - a WIPS is the way to handle this problem.
upvoted 0 times
Theron
2 months ago
A WIPS can provide real-time monitoring and alerts for any unauthorized access points in the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamela
2 months ago
Using a WIPS is a proactive approach to detecting and responding to rogue access points.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
2 months ago
I agree, hiding the SSID is not effective at all. WIPS is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herschel
3 months ago
I personally think option D is also important. Having a WIPS in place can help detect and respond to rogue access points effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
3 months ago
I agree with Adela. WPA2-Enterprise with mutual authentication is crucial for protecting corporate devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
3 months ago
Option A is the way to go. Strong security measures like WPA2-Enterprise are essential for protecting corporate devices against rogue APs.
upvoted 0 times
Laurene
2 months ago
Port security with limited MAC addresses is a good additional measure to take.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
3 months ago
Hiding the SSID of legitimate APs can also help prevent intruders from setting up rogue APs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
3 months ago
We should also consider implementing a WIPS for rogue detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
3 months ago
I agree, using WPA2-Enterprise is crucial for protecting our network.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adela
4 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. It provides strong security measures for network access.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel