Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CWNP Exam CWNA-109 Topic 2 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWNA-109 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 2
[All CWNA-109 Questions]

What primary metric of scanning can stations use to select the best AP for connectivity to the desired BSS?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

USB 3 devices in the user's work area are the most likely cause of this interference when using a spectrum analyzer to look for non-Wi-Fi interference sources. A spectrum analyzer is a tool that measures and visualizes the radio frequency activity and interference in the wireless environment. A spectrum analyzer can show the spectrum usage and energy levels on each frequency band or channel and help identify and locate the sources of interference. Interference is any unwanted signal that disrupts or degrades the intended signal on a wireless channel. Interference can be caused by various sources, such as other Wi-Fi devices, non-Wi-Fi devices, or natural phenomena. Interference can affect WLAN performance and quality by causing signal loss, noise, distortion, or errors. USB 3 devices are non-Wi-Fi devices that use USB 3.0 technology to transfer data at high speeds between computers and peripherals, such as hard drives, flash drives, cameras, or printers. USB 3 devices can generate electromagnetic radiation that interferes with Wi-Fi signals in the 2.4 GHz band, especially when they are close to Wi-Fi devices or antennas. USB 3 devices can cause significant interference across the entire 2.4 GHz band (not on a few select frequencies) within the desktop area of a user's workspace, but the interference disappears quickly after just 2 meters. This is because USB 3 devices emit broadband interference that affects all channels in the 2.4 GHz band with a high intensity near the source but a low intensity at a distance due to attenuation. The other options are not likely to cause this interference pattern when using a spectrum analyzer to look for non-Wi-Fi interference sources. Bluetooth devices in the user's work area are non-Wi-Fi devices that use Bluetooth technology to communicate wirelessly between computers and peripherals, such as keyboards, mice, headphones, or speakers. Bluetooth devices can cause interference with Wi-Fi signals in the 2.4 GHz band, but they use frequency hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technique that changes frequencies rapidly and randomly within a range of 79 channels. Therefore, Bluetooth devices do not cause significant interference across the entire 2.4 GHz band (not on a few select frequencies), but rather intermittent interference on some channels at different times. Excess RF energy from a nearby AP is not a non-Wi-Fi interference source but rather a Wi-Fi interference source that occurs when an AP transmits more power than necessary for its coverage area. Excess RF energy from a nearby AP can cause co-channel interference (CCI) with other APs or client devices that use the same channel within range of each other. CCI reduces performance and capacity because it causes contention and collisions on the wireless medium,


Contribute your Thoughts:

Zoila
6 days ago
Hmm, let's see... Signal strength, latency, throughput, or frame errors? Sounds like a classic game of 'Which One Doesn't Belong?' I wonder if the test writers are trying to trick us or just have a twisted sense of humor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
12 days ago
FCS errors? What is this, a debugging exercise? I just want to connect to the darn network, not analyze frame checksums!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
15 days ago
Throughput speed? Really? Who cares about that when you're just trying to connect to the network? I'll take a strong signal any day!
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
17 days ago
PING latency? Seriously? That's for testing internet connectivity, not choosing the best AP for your local network. C'mon, man!
upvoted 0 times
...
Artie
19 days ago
Signal strength of AP beacons received? That's a no-brainer! How else are we supposed to know which AP is the strongest?
upvoted 0 times
...
Man
24 days ago
I believe throughput speed in Mbps is also important for connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
25 days ago
I agree with Corinne, signal strength is crucial for selecting the best AP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
26 days ago
I think the primary metric is signal strength of AP beacons received.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel