Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CWNP CWNA-109 Exam - Topic 2 Question 18 Discussion

Posted by Rueben on Oct 24, 2024 at 07:48 PM

What primary metric of scanning can stations use to select the best AP for connectivity to the desired BSS?

Suggested Answer: A

USB 3 devices in the user's work area are the most likely cause of this interference when using a spectrum analyzer to look for non-Wi-Fi interference sources. A spectrum analyzer is a tool that measures and visualizes the radio frequency activity and interference in the wireless environment. A spectrum analyzer can show the spectrum usage and energy levels on each frequency band or channel and help identify and locate the sources of interference. Interference is any unwanted signal that disrupts or degrades the intended signal on a wireless channel. Interference can be caused by various sources, such as other Wi-Fi devices, non-Wi-Fi devices, or natural phenomena. Interference can affect WLAN performance and quality by causing signal loss, noise, distortion, or errors. USB 3 devices are non-Wi-Fi devices that use USB 3.0 technology to transfer data at high speeds between computers and peripherals, such as hard drives, flash drives, cameras, or printers. USB 3 devices can generate electromagnetic radiation that interferes with Wi-Fi signals in the 2.4 GHz band, especially when they are close to Wi-Fi devices or antennas. USB 3 devices can cause significant interference across the entire 2.4 GHz band (not on a few select frequencies) within the desktop area of a user's workspace, but the interference disappears quickly after just 2 meters. This is because USB 3 devices emit broadband interference that affects all channels in the 2.4 GHz band with a high intensity near the source but a low intensity at a distance due to attenuation. The other options are not likely to cause this interference pattern when using a spectrum analyzer to look for non-Wi-Fi interference sources. Bluetooth devices in the user's work area are non-Wi-Fi devices that use Bluetooth technology to communicate wirelessly between computers and peripherals, such as keyboards, mice, headphones, or speakers. Bluetooth devices can cause interference with Wi-Fi signals in the 2.4 GHz band, but they use frequency hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technique that changes frequencies rapidly and randomly within a range of 79 channels. Therefore, Bluetooth devices do not cause significant interference across the entire 2.4 GHz band (not on a few select frequencies), but rather intermittent interference on some channels at different times. Excess RF energy from a nearby AP is not a non-Wi-Fi interference source but rather a Wi-Fi interference source that occurs when an AP transmits more power than necessary for its coverage area. Excess RF energy from a nearby AP can cause co-channel interference (CCI) with other APs or client devices that use the same channel within range of each other. CCI reduces performance and capacity because it causes contention and collisions on the wireless medium,


Get Premium CWNA-109 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
28 comments · newest first
GL
Glory 11 months ago
I agree, signal strength is the go-to metric!
RE
Rebecka 11 months ago
Wait, are FCS errors really a thing? I thought they were rare.
GA
Gail 11 months ago
Signal strength is key, but throughput matters too!
TA
Tawanna 11 months ago
I think PING latency is more important for real-world use.
LI
Lisha 11 months ago
Definitely signal strength of AP beacons!
FA
Fairy 12 months ago
FCS errors seem relevant, but I don't recall them being the main metric for selecting an AP. I might be mixing it up with troubleshooting techniques.
BA
Barb 12 months ago
I feel like throughput speed could be a factor, but it seems more like a secondary measure. We practiced questions on this, and I think signal strength was emphasized.
DE
Deane 12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about PING latency being important for performance. It might not be the primary metric, though.
KA
Kattie 1 year ago
I think the signal strength of AP beacons is the primary metric. We discussed how it affects connectivity in class.
MA
Marta 1 year ago
Ah, I see what the question is getting at now. The goal during the scanning process is to find the AP with the strongest signal, so that has to be the primary metric used. I'm feeling good about selecting option A for this one.
MU
Muriel 1 year ago
Okay, I think I know the answer here. The key is that the question is asking about the primary metric used for scanning and AP selection, not general network performance. So the answer has to be signal strength of the AP beacons.
HO
Hortencia 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Is it really just signal strength, or could it be something like latency or throughput? I'll have to think this through carefully.
CA
Caitlin 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the primary metric used for AP selection during scanning. I'm pretty confident the answer is signal strength of the AP beacons.
ZO
Zoila 1 year ago
Hmm, let's see... Signal strength, latency, throughput, or frame errors? Sounds like a classic game of 'Which One Doesn't Belong?' I wonder if the test writers are trying to trick us or just have a twisted sense of humor.
DU
Dusti 1 year ago
↳ replying to Zoila
D) FCS errors in frames transmitted to and from the AP.
LA
Lavina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Zoila
C) Throughput speed in Mbps.
CA
Carri 1 year ago
↳ replying to Zoila
A) Signal strength of AP beacons received.
TI
Tiera 1 year ago
FCS errors? What is this, a debugging exercise? I just want to connect to the darn network, not analyze frame checksums!
NO
Nobuko 1 year ago
Throughput speed? Really? Who cares about that when you're just trying to connect to the network? I'll take a strong signal any day!
JO
Jody 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nobuko
D) FCS errors in frames transmitted to and from the AP.
LE
Leigha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nobuko
A strong signal is important for a stable connection.
CA
Cathrine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nobuko
C) Throughput speed in Mbps.
RA
Raul 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nobuko
A) Signal strength of AP beacons received.
AG
Agustin 1 year ago
PING latency? Seriously? That's for testing internet connectivity, not choosing the best AP for your local network. C'mon, man!
AR
Artie 1 year ago
Signal strength of AP beacons received? That's a no-brainer! How else are we supposed to know which AP is the strongest?
MA
Man 2 years ago
I believe throughput speed in Mbps is also important for connectivity.
WI
Willow 2 years ago
I agree with Corinne, signal strength is crucial for selecting the best AP.
CO
Corinne 2 years ago
I think the primary metric is signal strength of AP beacons received.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel