New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CWNP CWNA-109 Exam - Topic 2 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWNA-109 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 2
[All CWNA-109 Questions]

What primary metric of scanning can stations use to select the best AP for connectivity to the desired BSS?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

USB 3 devices in the user's work area are the most likely cause of this interference when using a spectrum analyzer to look for non-Wi-Fi interference sources. A spectrum analyzer is a tool that measures and visualizes the radio frequency activity and interference in the wireless environment. A spectrum analyzer can show the spectrum usage and energy levels on each frequency band or channel and help identify and locate the sources of interference. Interference is any unwanted signal that disrupts or degrades the intended signal on a wireless channel. Interference can be caused by various sources, such as other Wi-Fi devices, non-Wi-Fi devices, or natural phenomena. Interference can affect WLAN performance and quality by causing signal loss, noise, distortion, or errors. USB 3 devices are non-Wi-Fi devices that use USB 3.0 technology to transfer data at high speeds between computers and peripherals, such as hard drives, flash drives, cameras, or printers. USB 3 devices can generate electromagnetic radiation that interferes with Wi-Fi signals in the 2.4 GHz band, especially when they are close to Wi-Fi devices or antennas. USB 3 devices can cause significant interference across the entire 2.4 GHz band (not on a few select frequencies) within the desktop area of a user's workspace, but the interference disappears quickly after just 2 meters. This is because USB 3 devices emit broadband interference that affects all channels in the 2.4 GHz band with a high intensity near the source but a low intensity at a distance due to attenuation. The other options are not likely to cause this interference pattern when using a spectrum analyzer to look for non-Wi-Fi interference sources. Bluetooth devices in the user's work area are non-Wi-Fi devices that use Bluetooth technology to communicate wirelessly between computers and peripherals, such as keyboards, mice, headphones, or speakers. Bluetooth devices can cause interference with Wi-Fi signals in the 2.4 GHz band, but they use frequency hopping spread spectrum (FHSS) technique that changes frequencies rapidly and randomly within a range of 79 channels. Therefore, Bluetooth devices do not cause significant interference across the entire 2.4 GHz band (not on a few select frequencies), but rather intermittent interference on some channels at different times. Excess RF energy from a nearby AP is not a non-Wi-Fi interference source but rather a Wi-Fi interference source that occurs when an AP transmits more power than necessary for its coverage area. Excess RF energy from a nearby AP can cause co-channel interference (CCI) with other APs or client devices that use the same channel within range of each other. CCI reduces performance and capacity because it causes contention and collisions on the wireless medium,


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Glory
3 months ago
I agree, signal strength is the go-to metric!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
3 months ago
Wait, are FCS errors really a thing? I thought they were rare.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
3 months ago
Signal strength is key, but throughput matters too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawanna
4 months ago
I think PING latency is more important for real-world use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
4 months ago
Definitely signal strength of AP beacons!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fairy
4 months ago
FCS errors seem relevant, but I don't recall them being the main metric for selecting an AP. I might be mixing it up with troubleshooting techniques.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
4 months ago
I feel like throughput speed could be a factor, but it seems more like a secondary measure. We practiced questions on this, and I think signal strength was emphasized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about PING latency being important for performance. It might not be the primary metric, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
5 months ago
I think the signal strength of AP beacons is the primary metric. We discussed how it affects connectivity in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
5 months ago
Ah, I see what the question is getting at now. The goal during the scanning process is to find the AP with the strongest signal, so that has to be the primary metric used. I'm feeling good about selecting option A for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Muriel
5 months ago
Okay, I think I know the answer here. The key is that the question is asking about the primary metric used for scanning and AP selection, not general network performance. So the answer has to be signal strength of the AP beacons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hortencia
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Is it really just signal strength, or could it be something like latency or throughput? I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the primary metric used for AP selection during scanning. I'm pretty confident the answer is signal strength of the AP beacons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zoila
10 months ago
Hmm, let's see... Signal strength, latency, throughput, or frame errors? Sounds like a classic game of 'Which One Doesn't Belong?' I wonder if the test writers are trying to trick us or just have a twisted sense of humor.
upvoted 0 times
Dusti
9 months ago
D) FCS errors in frames transmitted to and from the AP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
9 months ago
C) Throughput speed in Mbps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
10 months ago
A) Signal strength of AP beacons received.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tiera
10 months ago
FCS errors? What is this, a debugging exercise? I just want to connect to the darn network, not analyze frame checksums!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
10 months ago
Throughput speed? Really? Who cares about that when you're just trying to connect to the network? I'll take a strong signal any day!
upvoted 0 times
Jody
8 months ago
D) FCS errors in frames transmitted to and from the AP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
8 months ago
A strong signal is important for a stable connection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
8 months ago
C) Throughput speed in Mbps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
9 months ago
A) Signal strength of AP beacons received.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Agustin
10 months ago
PING latency? Seriously? That's for testing internet connectivity, not choosing the best AP for your local network. C'mon, man!
upvoted 0 times
...
Artie
10 months ago
Signal strength of AP beacons received? That's a no-brainer! How else are we supposed to know which AP is the strongest?
upvoted 0 times
...
Man
10 months ago
I believe throughput speed in Mbps is also important for connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
10 months ago
I agree with Corinne, signal strength is crucial for selecting the best AP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
11 months ago
I think the primary metric is signal strength of AP beacons received.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel