New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CWNP CWISA-103 Exam - Topic 2 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWISA-103 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 2
[All CWISA-103 Questions]

Which one of the following location tracking technologies is most energy efficient in typical implementations?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

BLE Beacon Power Efficiency:Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) beacons are designed for low power consumption.Their primary function is to periodically broadcast short data packets (advertising their presence).

Other Technologies:

Cellular:More power-hungry due to long-range communication and complex protocols.

GPS:Power intensive,especially when actively tracking location.

Wi-Fi:


by Keena at Nov 23, 2025, 08:53 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CWISA-103 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gearldine
9 hours ago
BLE Beacons use way less energy than GPS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chi
6 days ago
Wi-Fi? Really? That's like trying to power a rocket ship with a hamster on a wheel.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
11 days ago
GPS? More like G-Waste-of-Battery if you ask me. That thing sucks the life out of your device.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
16 days ago
I'd have to go with Cellular. It may not be the most efficient, but it's reliable and widely available.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
21 days ago
BLE Beacons are definitely the most energy-efficient option here. The low power consumption is a game-changer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
26 days ago
I feel like I’ve seen BLE Beacons mentioned as the best for low energy use, but I might be mixing it up with something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
1 month ago
Cellular seems like it would use a lot of power, but I’m not confident about the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenny
1 month ago
I remember a practice question about GPS being less efficient than Wi-Fi, but I can’t recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johanna
1 month ago
I think BLE Beacons are supposed to be really energy efficient, but I’m not entirely sure how they compare to the others in practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
2 months ago
Ugh, I'm really struggling with this question. I can't quite remember the power consumption details for each option. I'll have to guess and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
2 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Based on what I've learned, BLE Beacons are generally the most energy-efficient location tracking technology in typical use cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
2 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this. I know GPS uses a lot of battery, but I'm not sure how the other options compare. I'll have to review my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
3 months ago
Totally agree, BLE is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tina
3 months ago
Cellular all the way! It's like having a personal energy vampire to keep your device alive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldo
3 months ago
Okay, let's see. GPS is pretty power-hungry, so that's probably not the most efficient. BLE Beacons or Wi-Fi could be good options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
3 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the power consumption of each technology.
upvoted 0 times
Shayne
2 months ago
GPS drains battery quickly too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
2 months ago
Cellular uses a lot of power, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
2 months ago
I think BLE Beacons are the most energy efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel