This is a tricky one. I'm going to have to review my notes on the ZT tenets to make sure I understand the differences between them. I don't want to guess and risk getting it wrong.
Okay, I think I've got it. The "assume breach" tenet is the one that's based on the idea that there are bad actors both inside and outside the network. That makes sense as a core principle of the zero trust approach.
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options all sound similar, and I'm not totally clear on the differences between the ZT tenets. I'll have to think this through carefully.
This one seems pretty straightforward. The key is to focus on the ZT tenets and figure out which one is based on the idea of malicious actors both inside and outside the network.
"Assume breach" is the answer. That tenet is all about recognizing that the network is already compromised, so you have to continuously verify and validate everything, regardless of where the threats are coming from.
I'm a little confused by the wording of this question. I'll have to re-read it a few times to make sure I understand which tenet it's asking about. Hopefully I can figure it out before time runs out.
Okay, I've got this. The "Assume breach" tenet is the one that's based on the idea of malicious actors inside and outside the network. Gotta remember that for the exam.
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options all sound similar, but I think I'll go with "Assume breach" since that seems to match the description in the question.
This one seems pretty straightforward. The key is to focus on the ZT tenets and think about which one is based on the idea of malicious actors both inside and outside the network.
Wait, is 'Requiring continuous monitoring' even a real Zero Trust tenet? That sounds like something my grandma would come up with. 'Assume breach' is clearly the way to go.
Wait, is 'Requiring continuous monitoring' even a real Zero Trust tenet? That sounds like something my grandma would come up with. 'Assume breach' is clearly the way to go.
The ZT tenet of assume breach is based on the notion that malicious actors reside inside and outside the network, and that any user, device, or service can be compromised at any time. Therefore, ZT requires continuous verification and validation of all entities and transactions, and does not rely on implicit trust or perimeter-based defenses
Hmm, this is a tough call. 'Scrutinize explicitly' sounds like it could be the right answer, but 'Assume breach' just makes more sense to me. Can't be too careful with all these hackers out there!
I'm feeling confident about this one. Gotta be 'Assume a hostile environment' - that's the foundation of Zero Trust, right? Can't trust anyone or anything these days.
Ooh, this is a tricky one! I'd have to go with 'Assume breach' - the whole idea of Zero Trust is that you can't trust anything, even if it's inside your network.
Adelle
6 months agoKerry
6 months agoNoah
6 months agoJulio
6 months agoHermila
7 months agoHerschel
7 months agoScarlet
7 months agoWayne
7 months agoEmilio
7 months agoTony
8 months agoRichelle
8 months agoRasheeda
8 months agoSusy
8 months agoAn
8 months agoFrancoise
8 months agoWendell
8 months agoBlair
8 months agoTomoko
8 months agoEna
1 year agoCarolynn
11 months agoLeonor
11 months agoShawna
11 months agoAhmed
11 months agoCarlee
11 months agoLeandro
12 months agoLaine
1 year agoJanine
1 year agoVirgina
11 months agoTitus
11 months agoBev
11 months agoSkye
1 year agoPamella
12 months agoAlba
12 months agoElise
1 year agoCristal
1 year agoJacqueline
1 year agoJovita
1 year agoCarli
1 year agoMiles
1 year agoRoy
1 year agoShoshana
1 year agoLouvenia
1 year agoReita
1 year agoDarnell
1 year agoArletta
1 year ago