Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CrowdStrike Exam CCFR-201 Topic 2 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for CrowdStrike's CCFR-201 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 2
[All CCFR-201 Questions]

What does pivoting to an Event Search from a detection do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

According to theCrowdStrike Falcon Devices Add-on for Splunk Installation and Configuration Guide v3.1.5+, Global Prevalence and Local Prevalence are two fields that provide information about how common or rare a file is based on its hash value2.Global Prevalence tells you how frequently the hash of the triggering file is seen across all CrowdStrike customer environments2.Local Prevalence tells you how frequently the hash of the triggering file is seen within your environment (CID)2.These fields can help you assess the risk and impact of a detection2.


by Merilyn at Jan 10, 2025, 12:00 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCFR-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Chery
24 days ago
Wait, so pivoting to an Event Search is like a superpower that lets me see the future of all related events? Mind blown!
upvoted 0 times
Lelia
23 hours ago
A) It gives you the ability to search for similar events on other endpoints quickly
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viki
26 days ago
I'm leaning towards option A. Being able to quickly search for similar events on other endpoints could be really useful for understanding the scope of this issue.
upvoted 0 times
Yvette
3 days ago
Agreed, having the ability to search for similar events quickly can give us a better understanding of the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
20 days ago
I think option A is the best choice. It can help us find similar events on other endpoints easily.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fatima
1 months ago
Haha, option D sounds like a joke answer. Searching for specific event types within a detection? That's way too simple to be the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Kimbery
3 days ago
User 2: I disagree, I believe option C is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
18 days ago
User 2: I agree with you, option D does sound like a joke answer. It's too specific for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
18 days ago
User 1: I think option A is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
1 months ago
User 1: I think option A is the correct choice. It makes sense to search for similar events on other endpoints quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Virgilio
2 months ago
Option C looks promising, as a Process Timeline would give me a better understanding of the related events. But I'm not sure if that's the specific functionality of pivoting to an Event Search.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
2 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. It takes you to the raw Insight event data and provides you with a number of Event Actions, which is exactly what I need to investigate this detection further.
upvoted 0 times
Huey
5 days ago
User 2: I agree, it takes you to the raw Insight event data and provides you with a number of Event Actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
1 months ago
User 1: I think option B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Caprice
2 months ago
I see both points. But I think it's important to have a Process Timeline for that detection so you can see all related events. So, I would choose option C as the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
2 months ago
I disagree with Elena. I believe that it takes you to the raw Insight event data and provides you with a number of Event Actions. Option B seems more logical to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
2 months ago
I think pivoting to an Event Search from a detection allows you to search for similar events on other endpoints quickly. So, I would go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel