CrowdStrike Exam CCFH-202 Topic 2 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for CrowdStrike's CCFH-202 exam

Question #: 37
Topic #: 2

Which of the following is the proper method to quantify search results, enabling a hunter to quickly sort and identify outliers?

AUsing the '| stats count by' command at the end of a search string in Event Search

BUsing the '|stats count' command at the end of a search string in Event Search

CUsing the '|eval' command at the end of a search string in Event Search

DExporting Event Search results to a spreadsheet and aggregating the results

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

The Linux Sensor report is where an analyst would find information about shells spawned by root, Kernel Module loads, and wget/curl usage. The Linux Sensor report is a pre-defined report that provides a summary view of selected activities on Linux hosts. It shows information such as process execution events, network connection events, file write events, etc. that occurred on Linux hosts within a specified time range. The Sensor Health report, the Sensor Policy Daily report, and the Mac Sensor report do not provide the same information.

by Wilbert at Jan 25, 2025, 02:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCFH-202 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lisbeth

3 months ago

You know, option A is great and all, but have you ever tried it with a nice glass of Chardonnay? Really brings out the nuances of the search data.

upvoted 0 times

Katheryn

1 months ago

D) Exporting Event Search results to a spreadsheet and aggregating the results

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamey

1 months ago

C) Using the \'|eval\' command at the end of a search string in Event Search

upvoted 0 times

...

Frankie

1 months ago

B) Using the \'|stats count\' command at the end of a search string in Event Search

upvoted 0 times

...

Juliana

2 months ago

A) Using the \'| stats count by\' command at the end of a search string in Event Search

upvoted 0 times

...

Krystina

3 months ago

Ooh, a Splunk question! I'm all over this. Option A is the winner - the '| stats count by' is my go-to for quantifying search results.

upvoted 0 times

Nan

2 months ago

I think exporting to a spreadsheet and aggregating the results with option D is the most effective method.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ivan

2 months ago

I prefer option B actually, using '|stats count' works well for me in quantifying search results.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elvera

2 months ago

I agree, option A is the way to go. It helps quickly sort and identify outliers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmelina

3 months ago

Ah, the '|eval' command, the Swiss Army knife of Splunk! But for this task, I reckon option A is the way to go. Nice and efficient.

upvoted 0 times

Elke

2 months ago

Exporting to a spreadsheet and aggregating the results might take too long, I'd stick with option A or B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margurite

2 months ago

I think option B with the '|stats count' command could work too, it's simple and straightforward.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

2 months ago

I agree, option A with the '| stats count by' command is definitely the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Youlanda

3 months ago

Option D sounds tempting, but exporting to a spreadsheet is just too much work. I'll stick with option B - the '|stats count' command is quick and easy.

upvoted 0 times