What happens when you attempt to compile and run the following code?#include #include #include #include using namespace std;templatestruct Out {ostream & out;Out(ostream & o): out(o){}void operator() (const T & val ) { out

Discuss C++ Institute CPP Exam Topic 6 Question 82

What happens when you attempt to compile and run the following code?

#include

using namespace std;

templatestruct Out {

ostream & out;

Out(ostream & o): out(o){}

void operator() (const T & val ) { out<

int main() {

int t[]={8, 10, 5, 1, 4, 6, 2, 7, 9, 3};

deque d1(t, t+10);

set s1(t,t+10);

cout<

return 0;

}

Choose all possible outputs (all that apply):

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium CPP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

37 comments · newest first

Sylvie 11 months ago

I doubt it, seems like a trick question.

Andra 11 months ago

Wait, are both searches returning true?

Lashaunda 11 months ago

Definitely not a compilation error.

Joanne 11 months ago

I think the output is 1 1.

Daniel 11 months ago

The code compiles fine, no errors.

Aja 12 months ago

I feel like there might be a compilation error because of the template structure, but I can't recall any specific issues related to that.

Yuki 12 months ago

I practiced something similar, and I think `binary_search` on a set should always return true if the element exists. But I'm not confident about the deque part.

Gilma 12 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think the output could be `1 1` because both containers should contain the number 4.

Boris 1 year ago

I remember that `binary_search` returns true if the element is found, so I think both searches should return true since 4 is in both the set and the deque.

Anabel 1 year ago

Hmm, this is a good one. I'll need to carefully work through the code step-by-step and make sure I understand how the `binary_search` function behaves with different container types.

Belen 1 year ago

Alright, I think I've got a handle on this. The `set` is an ordered container, so `binary_search` should work as expected. But the `deque` is an unordered container, so the `binary_search` call on that might not return the expected result.

Emeline 1 year ago

I'm a bit confused by the `Out` struct. I wonder if that's going to have any impact on the output. I'll need to make sure I understand what it's doing.

Vicente 1 year ago

Okay, let me see here. The code is using a `deque` and a `set`, so I'll need to consider the differences in their underlying implementations and how that might affect the `binary_search` results.

Marylin 1 year ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the code and think about how the `binary_search` function works with different container types.

Margart 1 year ago

This question seems pretty straightforward. I think the key is to focus on the details about the job's purpose and when it runs.

Dierdre 1 year ago

Gotta be C - getting SLAs in place ensures everyone is on the same page and accountable. That's the foundation for a strong customer relationship.

Rosendo 1 year ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll try to recall the OSPF neighbor states and see if I can eliminate any of these options.

Rima 1 year ago

This question is like a game of 'Hide and Seek' with the number 4. Will it be found in the set? Will it be lost in the deque? The suspense is killing me!

Vicki 1 year ago

Oh, I've got this! The output will be '1 0', because the `binary_search` function will work for the sorted set, but not for the unsorted deque. This is like trying to find a needle in a haystack... or a 4 in a deque of numbers.

Alida 1 year ago

↳ replying to Vicki

User3

Phyliss 1 year ago

↳ replying to Vicki

User2

Tammara 1 year ago

↳ replying to Vicki

User1

Doretha 1 year ago

This is a tricky one! I think the output will be '0 0', because the `binary_search` function will return 0 for both the set and the deque, as the value 4 is not present in the unsorted deque.

Denny 1 year ago

↳ replying to Doretha

So both binary_search functions will return 0.

Shelton 1 year ago

↳ replying to Doretha

I agree, the value 4 is not present in the unsorted deque.

Jolene 1 year ago

↳ replying to Doretha

I think the output will be '0 0'.

Rikki 1 year ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Let me think... Aha! The output should be '1 1', because the `binary_search` function will return 1 for both the set and the deque, since the value 4 is present in both data structures.

Ilene 1 year ago

↳ replying to Rikki

I agree with you, it should be '1 1'.

Nichelle 1 year ago

↳ replying to Rikki

I'm pretty sure it's '1 0'.

Filiberto 1 year ago

↳ replying to Rikki

I believe it will be '0 1'.

Shanda 1 year ago

↳ replying to Rikki

I think the output will be '0 0'.

Cyril 1 year ago

I believe the correct answer is A) 0 0 because binary_search will return false for both sets and deques.

Frederick 2 years ago

The code should compile and run without any issues. The output should be '1 0', since the `binary_search` function will return 1 for the set and 0 for the deque, as the set is sorted and the deque is not.

Coral 1 year ago

↳ replying to Frederick

User 2

Nada 1 year ago

↳ replying to Frederick

User 1

Karl 2 years ago

I agree with Jerry. Sets are not sorted, so binary_search won't work on them.

Jerry 2 years ago

I think the output will be A) 0 0 because binary_search does not work on sets.

C++ Institute CPP Exam - Topic 6 Question 82 Discussion