Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

C++ Institute CPP Exam - Topic 2 Question 113 Discussion

Posted by Joseph on Aug 14, 2025 at 06:18 AM

Which changes introduced independently will allow code to compile and display 0 1 8 9 (choose all that apply)

#include

#include

#include

using namespace std;

class A {

int a;

public:

A(int a):a(a){}

int getA() const { return a;}

/* Insert Code Here 1 */

};

/* Insert Code Here 2 */

int main(){

A t[] ={ 3, 4, 2, 1, 6, 5, 7, 9, 8, 0 };

vectorv(t, t+10);

set s1(v.begin(),v.end());

s1.insert(v.begin(),v.end());

s1.erase(s1.lower_bound(2),s1.upper_bound(7));

for(set::iterator i=s1.begin();i!= s1.end(); i++) {

cout<getA()<<" ";

}

cout<

return 0;

}

Suggested Answer: A, B, D

Get Premium CPP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
18 comments · newest first
KE
Keneth 9 months ago
I agree, D is essential for the set to work properly.
RU
Ruth 9 months ago
Wait, why do we need D? That seems odd.
VI
Vivan 9 months ago
C seems wrong, it flips the comparison.
RE
Rebeca 10 months ago
I think B is the right choice too!
CO
Corrinne 11 months ago
A is definitely needed for the output.
LO
Louann 11 months ago
I believe option D is also important because it defines the comparison for the set, but I can't recall if it needs to be at Place 2 specifically.
KA
Karon 11 months ago
I'm a bit confused about option C. It seems like it could work, but I feel like it might not give the correct order for the set.
GE
Gerald 11 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to define comparison operators for a custom class. I think option B is definitely correct.
RU
Rusty 12 months ago
I think option A is necessary for the code to compile, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the only one needed.
TE
Teri 12 months ago
I've got a strategy for this. I'll start by looking at the options that involve overloading the `<` operator, since that's what the `set` container uses to sort its elements. Then I'll consider how the different implementations would affect the sorting and insertion of the `A` objects.
DA
Dante 12 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key here is to understand how the `set` container works and what it requires for the elements to be properly sorted. I'll need to carefully evaluate each of the options and how they would impact the comparison and insertion of the `A` objects.
AN
Anglea 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not sure which changes would allow the code to compile and display the expected output. I'll need to review the operator overloading concepts and think through how they might affect the set operations.
TE
Tequila 1 year ago
This question is testing our understanding of operator overloading and how it affects the behavior of the `set` container. I think I need to carefully consider the different options and how they would impact the sorting and insertion of the `A` objects into the `set`.
JA
Jarvis 1 year ago
I think option B is the correct answer. Defining the less-than operator to compare the 'a' member of the A class will allow the set to properly order the elements.
SC
Scarlet 10 months ago
↳ replying to Jarvis
I think option A is also needed for proper output.
KR
Kristofer 10 months ago
↳ replying to Jarvis
But what about option D? It could work too.
ER
Ernestine 10 months ago
↳ replying to Jarvis
Yeah, without A, it won't compile correctly.
CI
Ciara 11 months ago
↳ replying to Jarvis
I agree, option B is essential for ordering.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel