Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

C++ Institute CPA-21-02 Exam - Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Posted by Gaynell on May 23, 2024 at 11:52 PM

Which code line inserted instead of the comment below will cause the program to produce the expected output?

Suggested Answer: A, B

Get Premium CPA-21-02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
GE
Gertude 11 months ago
Wait, can you use two namespaces like that?
NE
Nettie 11 months ago
D? Really? That doesn't seem right.
NA
Nana 11 months ago
C seems too specific, not sure it will work.
CL
Claribel 11 months ago
Nah, I believe B is the right one.
DO
Domitila 11 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
TW
Twila 12 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B, but I have a nagging feeling that we might need something from the second namespace too.
SH
Sharika 12 months ago
I feel like using just one namespace could lead to conflicts, so maybe option C is the way to go?
FE
Felicitas 12 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to choose the right namespace, but I can't recall if we needed both or just one.
CE
Celestina 1 year ago
I think option A might be correct since it includes both namespaces, but I'm not entirely sure if that's necessary.
CH
Charlesetta 1 year ago
This is a good opportunity to apply my understanding of namespaces. I'll carefully consider each option and try to eliminate the incorrect ones.
ER
Eric 1 year ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Namespace usage is something I've practiced a lot, so I should be able to work through this step-by-step.
JA
Javier 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to figure out which namespace contains the variables or functions needed to produce the expected output.
JU
Juan 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different namespaces here. I'll need to review my notes on using namespaces properly in C++.
JO
Joanna 1 year ago
This looks like a tricky namespace question. I'll need to carefully read through the code and think about how the different namespaces are being used.
AR
Arminda 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems a bit tricky. I'm not entirely sure how the gotoPriorityExpression values affect the evaluation order. I'll need to re-read the question and the policy details carefully.
DI
Dianne 1 year ago
Overlapping trust boundaries sounded familiar, but I can't quite remember how it applies to data threats.
CA
Carline 1 year ago
I'm not totally sure about this one. I know synchronous and asynchronous have to do with how the API calls are handled, but I'm not confident I can identify the right characteristic. I'll have to think it through carefully.
AL
Alyce 1 year ago
I think the key here is that the solution components are being assembled and constructed in direct response to a set of requirements. That points to "Design" as the best answer.
SH
Sherrell 1 year ago
I wonder if the expected output involves a surprise dance party. If so, I'm going with option B --> A::print(); *dances awkwardly*
OR
Orville 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sherrell
User 3: I agree with Carolynn, option A) ob2.A::print(); seems like the right choice.
CA
Carolynn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sherrell
User 2: I'm not sure, but I believe option C) ob2.B::print(); might be the answer.
GE
Georgene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sherrell
User 1: I think option A) ob2.A::print(); is the correct one.
MA
Markus 1 year ago
This is a real head-scratcher. I'm just going to flip a coin and hope for the best. *flips coin* Aha, option D it is!
LE
Letha 1 year ago
Hold on, the question says to use the 'expected output', so I'm guessing we need to call the print() method of the derived class B. Option C for the win!
AR
Arminda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Letha
Let's go with option C then, it seems to be the most logical choice.
ED
Edna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Letha
I'm not sure, but I think option C is the safest bet.
RE
Reynalda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Letha
But what about option A? Wouldn't that also work?
UL
Ulysses 1 year ago
↳ replying to Letha
I think you're right, option C seems to be the correct choice.
CA
Carman 1 year ago
Wait, aren't we supposed to use the scope resolution operator to access the print() method of A? I'm leaning towards option B.
NA
Natalya 1 year ago
But if you look at the image, it clearly shows that ob2 is an object of class A, so A) ob2.A::print() makes more sense
JU
Judy 2 years ago
Hmm, looks like we need to call the print() method of the base class A, not B. I think option A is the way to go.
TA
Tandra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Judy
Yes, option A will call the print() method of the base class A.
JE
Jennifer 1 year ago
↳ replying to Judy
I agree, option A is the correct one.
KI
Kizzy 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) ob2.B::print()
NA
Natalya 2 years ago
I think the correct answer is A) ob2.A::print()
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel