Copado Exam Copado-Developer Topic 9 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for Copado's Copado-Developer exam

Question #: 76
Topic #: 9

[All Copado-Developer Questions]

You would like to create a YAML file to remove all references to Field Level Security from managed

fields in profiles. Which value should you use in the replace_values parameter?

AThis is not possible.

B{!Environment.classes/packagePrefix__.*}.

CpackagePrefix__.*?.

DpackagePrefix__fieldName1, packagePrefix__fieldName2, packagePrefix__fieldName3 and so on.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Stephen at Sep 16, 2024, 07:25 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Copado-Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Micah

10 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think A) This is not possible might be the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alease

11 months ago

This question really separates the YAML pros from the YAML noobs. Option B is the way to go, no doubt. Unless you're feeling particularly masochistic and want to type out every field name. *shudders*

upvoted 0 times

Stephane

10 months ago

A) This is not possible.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenny

10 months ago

C) packagePrefix__.*?.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hobert

10 months ago

B) {!Environment.classes/packagePrefix__.*}.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marge

11 months ago

I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) packagePrefix__fieldName1, packagePrefix__fieldName2, packagePrefix__fieldName3 and so on.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrie

11 months ago

Hmm, Option D seems like a lot of typing. Who wants to manually list out every single field name? Not me! I'm team Option B all the way.

upvoted 0 times

...

Franchesca

11 months ago

Ah, the joys of YAML. I'd go with Option C - let's keep things simple and just use the packagePrefix__ regex. No need to list out every single field name.

upvoted 0 times

Lorenza

10 months ago

I would go with Option C as well, keeping it simple is always a good idea.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delsie

10 months ago

I think Option B might work better in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nickie

10 months ago

I agree, Option C seems like the most efficient choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elli

11 months ago

I'm not sure if this is possible at all. It seems like a lot of work to remove all those field-level security references manually. Option A might be the easiest path forward.

upvoted 0 times