Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Confluent CCDAK Exam - Topic 1 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for Confluent's CCDAK exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 1
[All CCDAK Questions]

Consumer failed to process record # 10 and succeeded in processing record # 11. Select the course of action that you should choose to guarantee at least once processing

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

This is active-passing as the replicated topic is used for read-only purposes only


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Ramonita
6 months ago
Committing at 11 could lead to data loss, B is the way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lina
6 months ago
Surprised that anyone would choose A, that sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
6 months ago
Wait, why not just commit at 11? Seems easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
7 months ago
Totally agree, B is the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
7 months ago
Gotta go with B, can't skip 10.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
7 months ago
I’m confused about whether committing at 11 would guarantee at least once processing. I need to think this through more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
7 months ago
Committing offsets at 11 seems risky since we might skip record #10 entirely. I’m leaning towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
7 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to wait until processing was successful before committing. Maybe we should not commit until record #10 is processed?
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
8 months ago
I think we should commit offsets at 10 to ensure we don't lose that record, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
8 months ago
Option B seems like the safest bet to me. I don't want to risk losing any records, so I'll hold off on committing until I've successfully processed record 10.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the best approach here. I'll need to review the concepts of at-least-once processing to make sure I understand the implications of each choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
8 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C - commit offsets at 11. That way, I know record 11 was processed successfully, and I can retry record 10 without losing any data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. If I commit offsets at 10, that means I'll reprocess record 10 even though it failed. But if I don't commit until 10 is successful, I might miss some records. Tough call.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the implications of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
8 months ago
Ah, I've seen this error before. It's usually a problem with the user account or credentials being used for the Service Mapping discovery. I'm pretty confident I can narrow this down to the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident this is asking about OMP, the Overlay Management Protocol. That's the protocol that runs between the vSmart controllers and the vEdge routers, and it handles all the control plane functions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
1 year ago
Option D: Throw the entire system out the window and start over. That's the only way to guarantee at least once processing - by processing everything at least once!
upvoted 0 times
Elena
12 months ago
Option D: Throw the entire system out the window and start over. That's the only way to guarantee at least once processing - by processing everything at least once!
upvoted 0 times
...
Socorro
12 months ago
C) Commit offsets at 11
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
1 year ago
B) Do not commit until successfully processing the record #10
upvoted 0 times
...
Eva
1 year ago
A) Commit offsets at 10
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alverta
1 year ago
Option B is the only sensible choice here. You don't want to be leaving records behind, that's just sloppy work. This isn't a game of 'pick a number, any number'!
upvoted 0 times
Brunilda
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, committing only after successfully processing record #10 is the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
1 year ago
User 1: Option B is definitely the way to go. We can't afford to miss processing any records.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lanie
1 year ago
I'm feeling lucky today, so I'm gonna go with option C. Commit at 11 and hope for the best! What could possibly go wrong?
upvoted 0 times
Daniel
1 year ago
User1: Well, I hope it works out for you, but I'll stick with option B for now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dudley
1 year ago
User3: I'm feeling lucky too, I'll go with option C and commit at 11.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
1 year ago
User2: I agree, it's safer to wait and commit only after successfully processing record #10.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
1 year ago
User1: I think it's risky to commit at 11 without processing 10 first.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lonny
1 year ago
But what if we commit offsets at 11 instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
1 year ago
Option A seems like the way to go. Commit those offsets at 10 and move on. Who needs record #11 anyway, am I right? *wink*
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
1 year ago
Hmm, this one's tricky. I'd go with option B - don't commit until you've processed record #10 successfully. That way you can be sure you've got at least one record processed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
1 year ago
I disagree, we should not commit until successfully processing record #10.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
1 year ago
I think we should commit offsets at 10.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel