MENU
Consumer failed to process record # 10 and succeeded in processing record # 11. Select the course of action that you should choose to guarantee at least once processing
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CCDAK Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
This is active-passing as the replicated topic is used for read-only purposes only
34 comments · newest first
RA
Ramonita
10 months ago
Committing at 11 could lead to data loss, B is the way.
LI
Lina
11 months ago
Surprised that anyone would choose A, that sounds risky!
AR
Arlette
11 months ago
Wait, why not just commit at 11? Seems easier.
EI
Eileen
11 months ago
Totally agree, B is the safest choice.
TE
Tenesha
11 months ago
Gotta go with B, can't skip 10.
JA
Jaclyn
12 months ago
I’m confused about whether committing at 11 would guarantee at least once processing. I need to think this through more.
TA
Tamar
12 months ago
Committing offsets at 11 seems risky since we might skip record #10 entirely. I’m leaning towards option B.
BO
Bobbye
12 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to wait until processing was successful before committing. Maybe we should not commit until record #10 is processed?
LO
Louisa
1 year ago
I think we should commit offsets at 10 to ensure we don't lose that record, but I'm not entirely sure.
DE
Devon
1 year ago
Option B seems like the safest bet to me. I don't want to risk losing any records, so I'll hold off on committing until I've successfully processed record 10.
KR
Krissy
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on the best approach here. I'll need to review the concepts of at-least-once processing to make sure I understand the implications of each choice.
RE
Reita
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option C - commit offsets at 11. That way, I know record 11 was processed successfully, and I can retry record 10 without losing any data.
DE
Deonna
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. If I commit offsets at 10, that means I'll reprocess record 10 even though it failed. But if I don't commit until 10 is successful, I might miss some records. Tough call.
AN
Antonio
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the implications of each option.
FR
Francesco
1 year ago
Ah, I've seen this error before. It's usually a problem with the user account or credentials being used for the Service Mapping discovery. I'm pretty confident I can narrow this down to the right answer.
AL
Alton
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident this is asking about OMP, the Overlay Management Protocol. That's the protocol that runs between the vSmart controllers and the vEdge routers, and it handles all the control plane functions.
CA
Carman
1 year ago
Option D: Throw the entire system out the window and start over. That's the only way to guarantee at least once processing - by processing everything at least once!
EL
Elena
1 year ago
Option D: Throw the entire system out the window and start over. That's the only way to guarantee at least once processing - by processing everything at least once!
SO
Socorro
1 year ago
C) Commit offsets at 11
FL
Fletcher
1 year ago
B) Do not commit until successfully processing the record #10
EV
Eva
1 year ago
A) Commit offsets at 10
AL
Alverta
1 year ago
Option B is the only sensible choice here. You don't want to be leaving records behind, that's just sloppy work. This isn't a game of 'pick a number, any number'!
BR
Brunilda
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, committing only after successfully processing record #10 is the safest bet.
WI
Willard
1 year ago
User 1: Option B is definitely the way to go. We can't afford to miss processing any records.
LA
Lanie
2 years ago
I'm feeling lucky today, so I'm gonna go with option C. Commit at 11 and hope for the best! What could possibly go wrong?
DA
Daniel
1 year ago
User1: Well, I hope it works out for you, but I'll stick with option B for now.
DU
Dudley
1 year ago
User3: I'm feeling lucky too, I'll go with option C and commit at 11.
PA
Paulene
1 year ago
User2: I agree, it's safer to wait and commit only after successfully processing record #10.
FL
Fletcher
1 year ago
User1: I think it's risky to commit at 11 without processing 10 first.
LO
Lonny
2 years ago
But what if we commit offsets at 11 instead?
TE
Tenesha
2 years ago
Option A seems like the way to go. Commit those offsets at 10 and move on. Who needs record #11 anyway, am I right? *wink*
MA
Margurite
2 years ago
Hmm, this one's tricky. I'd go with option B - don't commit until you've processed record #10 successfully. That way you can be sure you've got at least one record processed.
TE
Tennie
2 years ago
I disagree, we should not commit until successfully processing record #10.
LO
Lonny
2 years ago
I think we should commit offsets at 10.