Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Confluent CCDAK Exam - Topic 1 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for Confluent's CCDAK exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 1
[All CCDAK Questions]

A kafka topic has a replication factor of 3 and min.insync.replicas setting of 2. How many brokers can go down before a producer with acks=1 can't produce?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

min.insync.replicas does not impact producers when acks=1 (only when acks=all)


by Aja at May 09, 2022, 04:28 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCDAK Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Verona
7 months ago
Makes sense, but I didn't realize it was that strict!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
7 months ago
Nope, it's definitely 1. You need at least 2 in sync.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
7 months ago
Wait, are you sure? I thought it was 2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
7 months ago
Totally agree, it’s all about the min.insync.replicas!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
8 months ago
The answer is 1 broker can go down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
8 months ago
I’m confused about the acks=1 setting. Does that mean we can only afford to lose 1 broker? I thought it was more complicated than that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
8 months ago
This feels similar to a practice question we did on broker failures. I think we can lose 1 broker and still have enough replicas in sync.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about needing at least 2 brokers up for the min.insync.replicas. So maybe it's 2 brokers down?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aide
8 months ago
I think if the replication factor is 3 and min.insync.replicas is 2, then we can lose 1 broker and still produce, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by some of these terms like "NOP sled technique" and "heap-based security." I'll need to do a quick refresh on those concepts before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
8 months ago
Liquidity risk, for sure. That's the risk that the investment won't be easily convertible to cash without taking a big hit on the price. I feel pretty good about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
8 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the details and think about the different options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Grover
8 months ago
Okay, let me see here. I'm pretty sure it's not that the MDU doesn't need to support MPLS, since that's not really a benefit. I'm leaning towards the answer about not needing a layer 2 loop prevention protocol.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel