Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA SY0-701 Exam - Topic 1 Question 8 Discussion

A company is planning a disaster recovery site and needs to ensure that a single natural disaster would not result in the complete loss of regulated backup data. Which of the following should the company consider?
A) Geographic dispersion
B) Platform diversity
C) Hot site
D) Load balancing

CompTIA SY0-701 Exam - Topic 1 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's SY0-701 exam
Question #: 8
Topic #: 1
[All SY0-701 Questions]

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Karol
7 months ago
Wait, can one natural disaster really wipe out all backups?
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
8 months ago
Load balancing? Not sure how that helps in a disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
8 months ago
Hot site sounds like the best option for quick recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernice
8 months ago
I think platform diversity is just as important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
8 months ago
Geographic dispersion is a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
9 months ago
Load balancing seems more related to performance than disaster recovery, right? I feel like it doesn't really address the issue of data loss from a natural disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question where hot sites were mentioned. I think they provide immediate failover, which could be crucial for recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think platform diversity might be more about using different systems rather than protecting data from disasters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
9 months ago
I remember we discussed geographic dispersion in class as a key factor for disaster recovery. It makes sense to avoid losing everything in one location.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
9 months ago
The answer is clearly geographic dispersion. Spreading out the backup data is the best way to protect against a single point of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options. I'll need to re-read the question and think about how each of these could apply to a disaster recovery plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
9 months ago
Geographic dispersion is definitely the way to go here. Spreading out the backup data across multiple locations will help ensure it's not all lost in a single natural disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
9 months ago
This seems like a straightforward disaster recovery question. I'll focus on geographic dispersion as the key factor to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to think through the different options carefully before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
9 months ago
Ugh, wireless security questions are the worst. I feel like I know this stuff, but the wording of the options is throwing me off. I'll just have to make my best guess and move on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The options seem a bit similar, but I think the key is using a reusable package step. Option B with the Knowledge Module might be the way to go, but I'm not 100% confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
10 months ago
I think the cheap sensors could be a risk too, but maybe not as significant as the attack surface. My notes mentioned how low-cost devices often lack good security features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
2 years ago
I think both geographic dispersion and platform diversity are crucial for a solid disaster recovery plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
2 years ago
That's a good point, having backups on different platforms could provide extra security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
2 years ago
But what about platform diversity? Wouldn't that also help in case of a disaster?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
2 years ago
I agree, it's important to spread out the data to minimize risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
2 years ago
Yeah, having backups in different locations would ensure safety.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
2 years ago
I think the company should consider geographic dispersion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
2 years ago
Load balancing? Really? I don't see how that would help protect against a natural disaster wiping out the backup data. That's more for managing traffic, not disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
Willodean
2 years ago
A: Agreed. A mix of geographic dispersion, platform diversity, and hot site is essential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
2 years ago
C: Exactly. It's important to have a combination of strategies for disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
2 years ago
B: That makes sense. Load balancing is more about optimizing resources than disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
2 years ago
A: Load balancing may not directly protect against natural disasters, but it is still important for overall system efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
2 years ago
C: Hot site is another important consideration for disaster recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
2 years ago
B: Platform diversity could also help ensure that backup data is not completely lost in a disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
2 years ago
A: The company should consider geographic dispersion to protect against natural disasters.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arthur
2 years ago
Absolutely, diversifying the platforms used for backup storage is a smart move. And a hot site, where they can quickly fail over to in an emergency, would be essential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
2 years ago
I agree, geographic dispersion is key. But I also think platform diversity would be important, in case one type of hardware or software is affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
2 years ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm thinking the company should definitely consider geographic dispersion to ensure their backup data is not all wiped out by a single natural disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel