New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA SK0-005 Exam - Topic 1 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's SK0-005 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 1
[All SK0-005 Questions]

A company's IDS has identified outbound traffic from one of the web servers coming over port 389 to an outside address. This server only hosts websites. The company's SOC administrator has asked a technician to harden this server. Which of the following would be the BEST way to complete this request?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Hillary
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure this traffic is malicious? Seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brunilda
4 months ago
Totally agree, port 389 should be closed!
upvoted 0 times
...
Buffy
4 months ago
Port 637? That's not a common web port, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
4 months ago
I think moving to port 443 makes more sense for security!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
5 months ago
Disabling port 389 is definitely the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to secure a server, and disabling unnecessary ports was always the recommended approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
5 months ago
I feel like enabling port 389 for web traffic doesn't make sense at all. Why would we want to allow that if it's not needed?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think moving traffic to port 443 might be a good idea since it's used for HTTPS. But would that even apply here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
5 months ago
I remember studying that port 389 is typically used for LDAP, which doesn't really fit with a web server's purpose. Disabling it seems like a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
5 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think I can handle it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about the 'grant access using hierarchies' option. That could potentially have broader implications that I'd want to understand better before recommending it.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel