A SOC team has an AI agent that performs web searches and calls to the SOAR solution. The team is concerned about enterprise uptime and case resolution time.
Which of the following is the most appropriate use of the AI agent?
Basic Concept: AI agents in SOC environments can automate repetitive, rules-based response actions that previously required human intervention. When the primary concerns are enterprise uptime and case resolution time, the AI agent's ability to autonomously execute containment actions through SOAR is the most impactful application. CompTIA SecAI+ Study Guide covers AI agent use cases in security operations.
Why A is Correct: Using the AI agent to analyze incidents and execute containment actions through SOAR playbooks directly addresses both uptime and resolution time concerns. The agent can immediately analyze alert details, determine the appropriate playbook, and execute containment actions such as isolating compromised hosts or disabling compromised accounts autonomously, without waiting for human intervention. This dramatically reduces mean time to contain threats, improving both uptime and resolution speed.
Why B is Wrong: Enriching alerts with open-source intelligence improves analyst context but is a preparatory step rather than a response action. While valuable, it does not directly reduce resolution time by taking containment actions to stop ongoing threats.
Why C is Wrong: Aggregating metrics and generating leadership reports is an administrative function that consumes agent capacity for non-operational purposes. It improves visibility but does not directly improve uptime or case resolution time for active incidents.
Why D is Wrong: Creating tabletop exercises improves team preparedness over time through training scenarios. While beneficial for long-term capability development, it does not directly address the immediate concerns of enterprise uptime and active case resolution time.
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!