CompTIA CS0-003 Exam - Topic 2 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's CS0-003 exam

Question #: 36
Topic #: 2

Executives at an organization email sensitive financial information to external business partners when negotiating valuable contracts. To ensure the legal validity of these messages, the cybersecurity team recommends a digital signature be added to emails sent by the executives. Which of the following are the primary goals of this recommendation? (Select two).

AConfidentiality

BIntegrity

CPrivacy

DAnonymity

ENon-repudiation

FAuthorization

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, E

Digital signatures ensure the integrity and non-repudiation of emails. Integrity ensures that the message has not been altered in transit, as the digital signature would be invalidated if the content were tampered with. Non-repudiation ensures that the sender cannot deny having sent the email, as the digital signature is unique to their identity. These principles are crucial for legal validity, as recommended by CompTIA Security+ standards. Confidentiality (A) and privacy (C) relate to encryption, while authorization (F) and anonymity (D) are unrelated to the primary purpose of digital signatures in this context.

by Noelia at Dec 10, 2024, 09:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CS0-003 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Florinda

3 months ago

Privacy isn't really the focus with digital signatures, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Samira

3 months ago

Totally agree with integrity being a goal here!

upvoted 0 times

...

Santos

3 months ago

Wait, can digital signatures really ensure non-repudiation?

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilson

4 months ago

I think confidentiality is key too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marti

4 months ago

Definitely integrity and non-repudiation!

upvoted 0 times

...

Carline

4 months ago

I feel like integrity and non-repudiation make sense since they ensure the message is authentic and the sender can’t deny sending it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pamella

4 months ago

I’m a bit confused; I thought confidentiality was important for sensitive info, but maybe it’s not the primary goal in this case?

upvoted 0 times

...

Kelvin

4 months ago

I remember practicing a similar question, and I think non-repudiation is definitely one of the goals. Integrity seems likely too, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Pa

5 months ago

I think the main goals here are integrity and non-repudiation, but I’m not entirely sure about the confidentiality aspect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacob

5 months ago

Confidentiality and privacy don't seem to be the main goals here. The focus is more on verifying the identity of the sender and ensuring the message hasn't been tampered with.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashaun

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The digital signature is meant to ensure the integrity and non-repudiation of the sensitive financial information, so the executives can't deny sending it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fausto

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know digital signatures are used for authentication, but I'm not sure if that's the only goal here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eileen

5 months ago

This question is asking about the goals of using digital signatures, so I'll need to think about the key security properties that digital signatures provide.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mertie

1 year ago

I believe Authorization is necessary to control who has access to the emails, in addition to Integrity and Non-repudiation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hayley

1 year ago

Confidentiality and Privacy are also important to consider when dealing with sensitive financial information.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

1 year ago

Ooh, digital signatures, fancy! I bet the execs wish they could just use emojis instead, am I right? But seriously, Integrity and Non-repudiation are the way to go. Gotta keep those contracts air-tight.

upvoted 0 times

Aleisha

1 year ago

Non-repudiation is also important to hold the executives accountable for their actions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jade

1 year ago

I agree, Integrity is crucial to ensure the information remains unchanged.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aleta

1 year ago

I agree with Daniel, those two goals are crucial for ensuring the legal validity of the emails.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daniel

1 year ago

I think the primary goals are Integrity and Non-repudiation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marya

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about Privacy and Anonymity. Those don't seem relevant here. I'd go with Integrity and Non-repudiation - gotta make sure that sensitive financial info stays legit, you know?

upvoted 0 times

Joni

1 year ago

Authorization could be important to control who has access to the sensitive emails within the organization.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kendra

1 year ago

Privacy and Anonymity may not be as relevant in this context since the focus is on securing the financial information.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audra

1 year ago

Non-repudiation is also important to hold the executives accountable for the emails they send.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenny

1 year ago

I agree, Integrity is crucial to ensure the information remains accurate and trustworthy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melissa

1 year ago

Clearly, the goals are Integrity and Non-repudiation. The digital signature ensures the message hasn't been tampered with and the sender can't deny sending it. Easy peasy!

upvoted 0 times

Lashawnda

1 year ago

B) Integrity

upvoted 0 times

...

Erinn

1 year ago

A) Confidentiality

upvoted 0 times

...