Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CompTIA Exam CLO-002 Topic 3 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's CLO-002 exam
Question #: 100
Topic #: 3
[All CLO-002 Questions]

A startup company that provides streaming media services is considering a new CSP. The company sees an average volume of 5000TB daily and high QoS. It has received the following bids:

Based on the information above, which of the following CSPs offers the MOST cost-effective solution for streaming?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Whitley at Feb 09, 2025, 11:33 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CLO-002 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Cherilyn
3 months ago
I'm not sure I trust any of these providers. They all sound a bit shady. I think I'll just go with my own custom-built cloud solution running on a Raspberry Pi in my basement. It may not be as scalable, but at least I'll know where my data is.
upvoted 0 times
Refugia
1 months ago
User 3: I'm leaning towards Provider 3 for the cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakita
1 months ago
User 2: I think Provider 1 might be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, these providers seem a bit sketchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justine
3 months ago
Provider 4 seems like the obvious choice here. They have the lowest cost per TB and can handle the 5000TB daily volume. If I were the startup, I'd go with them and use the savings to buy a new ping-pong table for the office.
upvoted 0 times
Valentin
29 days ago
I see your point. Saving money on the CSP could definitely be beneficial for the startup in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
1 months ago
True, but with 5000TB daily volume, cost per TB is a big factor. Provider 4 still seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brande
1 months ago
But what about Provider 2? They have a slightly higher cost per TB, but they offer higher QoS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
2 months ago
I agree, Provider 4 definitely seems like the most cost-effective option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosamond
3 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards Provider 3 since they have the highest bandwidth and can handle the high QoS requirement, but I'll need to double-check the pricing details.
upvoted 0 times
Ocie
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, but we should definitely compare the pricing before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
3 months ago
User 1: I think Provider 3 might be the best option too, their bandwidth seems impressive.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willow
3 months ago
I think Provider 2 is the most cost-effective solution based on the information provided. The daily volume is 5000TB, and Provider 2 offers the lowest cost per TB.
upvoted 0 times
Argelia
2 months ago
User 4: I would go with Provider 2 as well, it seems to be the most cost-effective choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
2 months ago
User 3: Provider 1 seems to have the highest cost per TB, so I would eliminate that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
3 months ago
User 2: I think Provider 3 might also be a good option, they have a good reputation for high QoS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
3 months ago
User 1: I agree, Provider 2 seems to offer the best cost per TB.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jose
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards Provider 1, they seem to offer a good balance of cost and quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe Provider 3 is the best option because of their competitive pricing and high QoS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
4 months ago
I think Provider 2 offers the most cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel