Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CloudBees Exam CCJE Topic 4 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for CloudBees's CCJE exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 4
[All CCJE Questions]

How does Jenkins integrate with Source Code Management Systems (SCM)? Choose 3 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Elizabeth at Aug 06, 2024, 10:01 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCJE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lino
7 months ago
Ooh, option B sounds spicy! Giving all the developers free rein to execute privileged methods? That's a bold move, but I kinda like it. Yolo, amirite?
upvoted 0 times
Martha
7 months ago
Yeah, it's definitely a bold move. We should prioritize security over convenience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
7 months ago
Option B does sound tempting, but it might be risky to give all developers that much power.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rolande
8 months ago
Haha, option D is just asking for trouble! I'm not letting any 'trusted' code anywhere near my Jenkins master. Security first, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Rebecka
7 months ago
Let's go with option A then, configuring Global Pipeline Libraries at the Github Organization level for 'untrusted' code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
7 months ago
I agree, we can't afford to compromise the integrity of our Jenkins master.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
7 months ago
Option D is definitely risky. We should always prioritize security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ngoc
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Doesn't option C sound better? Running the libraries as 'untrusted' code might be a bit risky, but at least the developers can still use the sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
Anglea
7 months ago
I see your point. It's important to balance security with usability when setting up Global Pipeline Libraries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
7 months ago
That's true. Option A ensures the libraries are running as 'untrusted' code, but still allows developers to share their Pipeline code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
7 months ago
But wouldn't it be safer to configure Global Pipeline Libraries at the Github Organization level?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
7 months ago
Option C sounds better. Running the libraries as 'untrusted' code allows developers to use the sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavelle
8 months ago
I agree with Cordell, option A seems like the best choice to protect against malicious usage of Groovy methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordell
8 months ago
But configuring Global Pipeline Libraries at the Github Organization level makes more sense for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynda
8 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
8 months ago
Option A seems like the way to go. We can keep our developers safe while still letting them share their awesome Pipeline code.
upvoted 0 times
Shayne
8 months ago
Definitely, we want to prioritize security while also promoting collaboration among our developers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
8 months ago
I agree, configuring Global Pipeline Libraries at the Github Organization level as 'untrusted' code is a good security measure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
8 months ago
Option A seems like the best choice. It allows us to protect against malicious Groovy methods while still enabling code sharing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cordell
9 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel