Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIW 1D0-610 Exam - Topic 9 Question 52 Discussion

Marcella is looking for a very unique product online. She has found one on the XYZ Company's Web site, which is designed well and appears to be legitimate. As she navigates through the checkout process, she reaches the checkout page with this URL, which asks her to enter her credit card information:http://XYZ.com/gp/checkout.html/ref=chk_out_TLS12B_lb?ie=IJTFB&docld=10007931Why should Marcella cancel her online transaction instead of proceeding?
D) Because the link uses SSL/TLS encryption, which Marcella knows is not compatible with the browser she is using
A) Because the site uses 128-bit encryption, which is illegal for companies that are located overseas
B) Because the link contains abbreviations and is not completely readable, so Marcella is unsure of the server name
C) Because the link does not use SSL/TLS encryption and therefore the information Marcella enters would not be secure

CIW 1D0-610 Exam - Topic 9 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIW's 1D0-610 exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 9
[All 1D0-610 Questions]

Marcella is looking for a very unique product online. She has found one on the XYZ Company's Web site, which is designed well and appears to be legitimate. As she navigates through the checkout process, she reaches the checkout page with this URL, which asks her to enter her credit card information:

http://XYZ.com/gp/checkout.html/ref=chk_out_TLS12B_lb?ie=IJTFB&docld=10007931

Why should Marcella cancel her online transaction instead of proceeding?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Janey at Apr 14, 2024, 10:43 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1D0-610 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Myra
10 months ago
SSL/TLS is a must! Don't risk your info, Marcella!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
10 months ago
The abbreviations in that link are a red flag for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
10 months ago
Wait, is 128-bit encryption really illegal? That sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
10 months ago
I agree, always check for HTTPS before entering info!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
11 months ago
That URL looks sketchy, definitely not secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luther
11 months ago
I vaguely remember that 128-bit encryption is generally safe, but I don't think it's illegal for overseas companies. So, I don't think option A is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
11 months ago
I feel like option C is the right choice since it mentions SSL/TLS encryption, which is crucial for secure transactions. But I can't recall if the URL explicitly shows that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
11 months ago
I think I saw a similar question in practice where the focus was on the URL structure. It makes me wonder if the abbreviations in the link could be a red flag.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
11 months ago
I remember studying about SSL/TLS encryption, but I'm not sure if the URL indicates whether it's secure or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the encryption details. I'll need to double-check my notes to make sure I understand the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
11 months ago
I think the answer is C. The URL doesn't mention SSL/TLS, so the transaction wouldn't be secure. Better safe than sorry!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
11 months ago
Hmm, the URL seems a bit sketchy with all those abbreviations. I'm not sure I'd feel comfortable entering my credit card info there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully examine the URL and encryption details to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
12 months ago
Okay, the key thing here is whether the site is using secure encryption. If it's not SSL/TLS, then I definitely wouldn't proceed.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem pretty similar, so I'll need to carefully consider the differences between them to determine which one is specifically identified as a governance product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
12 months ago
I remember learning that RSTP ports start in the Discarding state, which blocks traffic until the port transitions to a forwarding state. I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
1 year ago
You know, I bet the XYZ Company is trying to pull a fast one with all those weird abbreviations in the URL. C is the clear choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
1 year ago
Wait, so the browser compatibility with SSL/TLS is the issue? That's a bit strange. I'm gonna go with C, just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
Frederica
1 year ago
C) Because the link does not use SSL/TLS encryption and therefore the information Marcella enters would not be secure
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
1 year ago
B) Because the link contains abbreviations and is not completely readable, so Marcella is unsure of the server name
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
1 year ago
A) Because the site uses 128-bit encryption, which is illegal for companies that are located overseas
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashonda
1 year ago
Haha, 128-bit encryption being illegal? That's a new one. Nah, I'm going with C. No SSL/TLS encryption means Marcella's info is not secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
1 year ago
Hmm, the lack of SSL/TLS encryption is definitely a red flag. Better to be safe than sorry and cancel this transaction. C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Lorean
1 year ago
Definitely. It's better to be cautious when it comes to online transactions. Canceling is the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
1 year ago
Yeah, I wouldn't trust a site that doesn't use SSL/TLS encryption. Better to cancel the transaction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamala
1 year ago
I agree, C is the safest option. It's not worth risking your credit card information.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Antione
1 year ago
Okay, this seems tricky. The link doesn't look completely legit, and the encryption thing is throwing me off. I'll go with C, just to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
Wendell
1 year ago
Better safe than sorry. C is the most secure option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
1 year ago
Yeah, better safe than sorry. Option C seems like the best choice in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
1 year ago
I'm not taking any chances with that link. C is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bethanie
1 year ago
I agree, the link does look suspicious. I would also go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
1 year ago
Yeah, I wouldn't risk it either. C seems like the best choice in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
1 year ago
I agree, the link does look suspicious. I think C is the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alita
1 year ago
But what if the site uses 128-bit encryption? Wouldn't that make it secure?
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
1 year ago
I agree with Pa. It's important to ensure the security of personal information online.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
1 year ago
I think Marcella should cancel the transaction because the link does not use SSL/TLS encryption.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel