Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIW 1D0-541 Exam - Topic 2 Question 98 Discussion

Consider the Information Engineering diagram shown in the exhibit for a buildingmanagement company. Referential integrity must be maintained such that a building cannot bedeleted when it has residents. Building_ID, R_ID, Room_Count and Room_Num are integernumbers, whereas Bldg_Name, Location and Res_Name are all represented by variable-lengthstrings with a maximum of 20 characters. Which SQL statement best implements the relationsshown in this diagram?
D) CREATE TABLE BUILDING ( Building_ID INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, Bldg_Name VARCHAR (20), Location VARCHAR (20), Room_Count INTEGER ); CREATE TABLE RESIDENT ( R_ID NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, Room_Num INTEGER, Res_Name VARCHAR (20), Building_ID INTEGER NOT NULL, FOREIGN KEY Building_ID REFERENCES BUILDING (Building_ID) ON DELETE NO CHECK ON UPDATE CASCADE);
A) CREATE TABLE BUILDING ( Building_ID INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, Bldg_Name VARCHAR (20), Location VARCHAR (20), Room_Count INTEGER ); CREATE TABLE RESIDENT ( R_ID NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, Room_Num INTEGER, Res_Name VARCHAR (20), Building_ID INTEGER NOT NULL, FOREIGN KEY Building_ID REFERENCES RESIDENT (Building_ID) ON DELETE NO CHECK);
B) CREATE TABLE BUILDING ( Building_ID INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, Bldg_Name VARCHAR (20), Location VARCHAR (20), Room_Count INTEGER ); CREATE TABLE RESIDENT ( R_ID NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, Room_Num INTEGER, Res_Name VARCHAR (20), Building_ID INTEGER NOT NULL, FOREIGN KEY Building_ID REFERENCES BUILDING (Building_ID) ON DELETE NO CHECK ON UPDATE CASCADE);
C) CREATE TABLE BUILDING ( Building_ID INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, Bldg_Name VARCHAR (20), Location VARCHAR (20), Room_Count INTEGER ); CREATE TABLE RESIDENT ( R_ID NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, Room_Num INTEGER, Res_Name VARCHAR (20), Building_ID INTEGER NOT NULL, FOREIGN KEY Building_ID REFERENCES BUILDING (Building_ID) ON DELETE NO CHECK ON UPDATE CASCADE);

CIW 1D0-541 Exam - Topic 2 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIW's 1D0-541 exam
Question #: 98
Topic #: 2
[All 1D0-541 Questions]

Consider the Information Engineering diagram shown in the exhibit for a building

management company. Referential integrity must be maintained such that a building cannot be

deleted when it has residents. Building_ID, R_ID, Room_Count and Room_Num are integer

numbers, whereas Bldg_Name, Location and Res_Name are all represented by variable-length

strings with a maximum of 20 characters. Which SQL statement best implements the relations

shown in this diagram?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Jerry at Sep 16, 2024, 07:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1D0-541 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Melita
9 months ago
Isn't it weird that you can delete a building with residents?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shakira
9 months ago
Totally agree with B, it maintains referential integrity well!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lillian
10 months ago
Wait, why is there "NO CHECK" in the foreign key? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
10 months ago
I think C is better because it has ON UPDATE CASCADE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
10 months ago
Option B looks solid with the foreign key reference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desiree
10 months ago
I thought option C looked good, but I’m confused about the ON UPDATE CASCADE part. Does that really apply here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the ON DELETE NO CHECK part might be wrong in all options. Shouldn't it be ON DELETE RESTRICT instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about referential integrity needing to prevent deletions when there are related records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
11 months ago
I think option B is the right choice because it correctly references the BUILDING table for the foreign key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
11 months ago
This is a good test of my SQL knowledge. I'll review each option carefully and select the one that best implements the relations shown in the diagram.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alayna
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to properly define the foreign key relationship between the RESIDENT and BUILDING tables to maintain referential integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the referential integrity constraint. I need to make sure I understand how that affects the foreign key relationship between the tables.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
11 months ago
This looks like a straightforward database design question. I'll carefully read through the requirements and the diagram to determine the correct SQL statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
11 months ago
I'm feeling confident about this one. The question provides clear instructions, and the diagram makes the database structure pretty straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
11 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty confident that the answer is Robert Koch, since he was known for his work identifying the anthrax bacteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lachelle
1 year ago
Hmm, this question is making me thirsty. I wonder if there's a building management company that also owns a pub. That would be a great side gig!
upvoted 0 times
Sarah
1 year ago
Hmm, a building management company owning a pub would be a cool idea!
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
1 year ago
C) CREATE TABLE BUILDING ( Building_ID INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, Bldg_Name VARCHAR (20), Location VARCHAR (20), Room_Count INTEGER ); CREATE TABLE RESIDENT ( R_ID NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, Room_Num INTEGER, Res_Name VARCHAR (20), Building_ID INTEGER NOT NULL, FOREIGN KEY Building_ID REFERENCES BUILDING (Building_ID) ON DELETE NO CHECK ON UPDATE CASCADE);
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
1 year ago
B) CREATE TABLE BUILDING ( Building_ID INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, Bldg_Name VARCHAR (20), Location VARCHAR (20), Room_Count INTEGER ); CREATE TABLE RESIDENT ( R_ID NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, Room_Num INTEGER, Res_Name VARCHAR (20), Building_ID INTEGER NOT NULL, FOREIGN KEY Building_ID REFERENCES BUILDING (Building_ID) ON DELETE NO CHECK ON UPDATE CASCADE);
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
1 year ago
A) CREATE TABLE BUILDING ( Building_ID INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, Bldg_Name VARCHAR (20), Location VARCHAR (20), Room_Count INTEGER ); CREATE TABLE RESIDENT ( R_ID NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, Room_Num INTEGER, Res_Name VARCHAR (20), Building_ID INTEGER NOT NULL, FOREIGN KEY Building_ID REFERENCES RESIDENT (Building_ID) ON DELETE NO CHECK);
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Whitley
1 year ago
I'm going with option D. It's the most concise and clear implementation of the relations shown in the diagram. As a bonus, the ON UPDATE CASCADE clause means I don't have to worry about manually updating references when a building's ID changes. Score one for the lazy programmer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannine
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards option C since it's the same as option D, but with a more descriptive comment. The ON DELETE NO CHECK and ON UPDATE CASCADE clauses are important to maintain referential integrity.
upvoted 0 times
Ronny
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C is the safest bet to maintain referential integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
1 year ago
I think option D is also a good choice because it includes the necessary clauses for referential integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice with the additional comment for clarity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yasuko
1 year ago
I'm not sure about the ON DELETE NO CHECK clause. Shouldn't it be ON DELETE RESTRICT to prevent deleting a building with residents?
upvoted 0 times
Audra
1 year ago
That's a good point, ON DELETE CASCADE would ensure that the related residents are also deleted when a building is deleted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
1 year ago
But wouldn't ON DELETE CASCADE be more appropriate to automatically delete the related residents when a building is deleted?
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
1 year ago
I think you're right, ON DELETE RESTRICT would be a better option to prevent deleting a building with residents.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Olene
1 year ago
I think option D is the correct answer. The foreign key constraint on the Building_ID column in the RESIDENT table references the BUILDING table, ensuring referential integrity. The ON DELETE NO CHECK clause prevents deleting a building that has residents, and the ON UPDATE CASCADE clause ensures that changes to the Building_ID in the BUILDING table are propagated to the RESIDENT table.
upvoted 0 times
Cassi
1 year ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
1 year ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mirta
1 year ago
Why do you think option C is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Janet
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is option B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel