New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIW 1D0-541 Exam - Topic 1 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIW's 1D0-541 exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 1
[All 1D0-541 Questions]

Consider the Orders relation shown in the exhibit. Which of the following SQL statements

would replace the value in the Sales_Rep_No column with 110 everywhere that Sales_Rep_No

108 is listed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Leonor at Sep 14, 2024, 10:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1D0-541 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Matilda
3 months ago
I thought it was A at first, but B makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
3 months ago
D looks wrong to me, can't set like that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunshine
3 months ago
Wait, is C even valid? Seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
4 months ago
Totally agree, B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
4 months ago
Option B is the correct syntax!
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestine
4 months ago
Option D confuses me a bit. I feel like the order of the clauses is wrong there. I think the SET should come after the WHERE clause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I remember that you need to specify the table first in the UPDATE statement. So, option C doesn't seem right since it lacks a WHERE clause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but option A seems off because of the syntax. I remember something about not using parentheses like that in an UPDATE statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
5 months ago
I think option B looks correct because it updates the Orders table directly and specifies the condition properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit stuck on this one. I know the basic UPDATE syntax, but I'm not sure which option best targets the rows with Sales_Rep_No 108 and updates them to 110. I'll need to think it through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
5 months ago
This is a good one. I know the UPDATE statement well, so I'm feeling confident about this. Option B looks like the most direct way to update the specific rows we need to change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
5 months ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. There are a few different ways to approach it, and I want to make sure I don't accidentally update the wrong rows. I'll double-check the syntax and think through each option carefully before selecting my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to update the Sales_Rep_No column in the Orders table where the existing value is 108, and set it to 110. Option B looks like the cleanest way to do that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a straightforward SQL update query, but I want to make sure I get the syntax right. I'll carefully read through the options and think about the best way to target the specific rows I need to update.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is D. TMOS seems like the most likely F5 proprietary platform that LTM would run on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
10 months ago
Option B, easy peasy. Unless you're feeling risky and want to try the 'UPDATE Orders SET Sales_Rep_No = 110 AND Emp_ID = 007' approach.
upvoted 0 times
Arlette
8 months ago
Updating both Sales_Rep_No and Emp_ID could cause errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
9 months ago
I agree, Option B is straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
9 months ago
Option B is the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malinda
10 months ago
B is the way to go. I'm not trying to rewrite the whole Orders table, just that one specific column value.
upvoted 0 times
Adelaide
8 months ago
User 3: Agreed, B is definitely the correct choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
8 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. It's more targeted that way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
9 months ago
User1: Exactly, we just need to target the Sales_Rep_No column where it equals 108 and change it to 110.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
9 months ago
User2: Yeah, B is definitely the most efficient option. We don't want to update the entire table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
9 months ago
User1: I agree, B is the correct answer. It only updates the specific column value we need to change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
9 months ago
User 1: B) UPDATE Orders SET Sales_Rep_No = 110 WHERE Sales_Rep_No = 108;
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luis
10 months ago
I'm going with B. The other options either don't target the right column or don't have the WHERE clause to only update the specific rows we want.
upvoted 0 times
Francine
10 months ago
Yes, option B is the best choice. It ensures that only the Sales_Rep_No column is updated to 110 where Sales_Rep_No is 108.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
10 months ago
I agree, option B is the correct one. It specifically targets the Sales_Rep_No column and only updates the rows where Sales_Rep_No is 108.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kirby
11 months ago
Why do you think A is the correct answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
11 months ago
Option B looks like the correct way to update the Sales_Rep_No column with 110 where it is currently 108. Straightforward and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
Solange
9 months ago
Option B is definitely the way to go for updating the Sales_Rep_No column.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
9 months ago
I would go with option B as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
9 months ago
Yes, I agree. It seems like the most efficient way to update the column.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
10 months ago
I think option B is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elenore
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirby
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel