Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIW 1D0-541 Exam - Topic 1 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIW's 1D0-541 exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 1
[All 1D0-541 Questions]

Consider the Orders relation shown in the exhibit. Which of the following SQL statements

would replace the value in the Sales_Rep_No column with 110 everywhere that Sales_Rep_No

108 is listed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Leonor at Sep 14, 2024, 10:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1D0-541 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Matilda
5 months ago
I thought it was A at first, but B makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
5 months ago
D looks wrong to me, can't set like that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunshine
5 months ago
Wait, is C even valid? Seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
5 months ago
Totally agree, B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
6 months ago
Option B is the correct syntax!
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestine
6 months ago
Option D confuses me a bit. I feel like the order of the clauses is wrong there. I think the SET should come after the WHERE clause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I remember that you need to specify the table first in the UPDATE statement. So, option C doesn't seem right since it lacks a WHERE clause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but option A seems off because of the syntax. I remember something about not using parentheses like that in an UPDATE statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
6 months ago
I think option B looks correct because it updates the Orders table directly and specifies the condition properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit stuck on this one. I know the basic UPDATE syntax, but I'm not sure which option best targets the rows with Sales_Rep_No 108 and updates them to 110. I'll need to think it through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
6 months ago
This is a good one. I know the UPDATE statement well, so I'm feeling confident about this. Option B looks like the most direct way to update the specific rows we need to change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
6 months ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. There are a few different ways to approach it, and I want to make sure I don't accidentally update the wrong rows. I'll double-check the syntax and think through each option carefully before selecting my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to update the Sales_Rep_No column in the Orders table where the existing value is 108, and set it to 110. Option B looks like the cleanest way to do that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
7 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a straightforward SQL update query, but I want to make sure I get the syntax right. I'll carefully read through the options and think about the best way to target the specific rows I need to update.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
7 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is D. TMOS seems like the most likely F5 proprietary platform that LTM would run on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
11 months ago
Option B, easy peasy. Unless you're feeling risky and want to try the 'UPDATE Orders SET Sales_Rep_No = 110 AND Emp_ID = 007' approach.
upvoted 0 times
Arlette
10 months ago
Updating both Sales_Rep_No and Emp_ID could cause errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
10 months ago
I agree, Option B is straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
10 months ago
Option B is the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malinda
12 months ago
B is the way to go. I'm not trying to rewrite the whole Orders table, just that one specific column value.
upvoted 0 times
Adelaide
10 months ago
User 3: Agreed, B is definitely the correct choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
10 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. It's more targeted that way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylou
11 months ago
User1: Exactly, we just need to target the Sales_Rep_No column where it equals 108 and change it to 110.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
11 months ago
User2: Yeah, B is definitely the most efficient option. We don't want to update the entire table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
11 months ago
User1: I agree, B is the correct answer. It only updates the specific column value we need to change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
11 months ago
User 1: B) UPDATE Orders SET Sales_Rep_No = 110 WHERE Sales_Rep_No = 108;
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luis
1 year ago
I'm going with B. The other options either don't target the right column or don't have the WHERE clause to only update the specific rows we want.
upvoted 0 times
Francine
12 months ago
Yes, option B is the best choice. It ensures that only the Sales_Rep_No column is updated to 110 where Sales_Rep_No is 108.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
12 months ago
I agree, option B is the correct one. It specifically targets the Sales_Rep_No column and only updates the rows where Sales_Rep_No is 108.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kirby
1 year ago
Why do you think A is the correct answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
1 year ago
Option B looks like the correct way to update the Sales_Rep_No column with 110 where it is currently 108. Straightforward and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
Solange
11 months ago
Option B is definitely the way to go for updating the Sales_Rep_No column.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
11 months ago
I would go with option B as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
11 months ago
Yes, I agree. It seems like the most efficient way to update the column.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
12 months ago
I think option B is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elenore
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirby
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel