Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Citrix Exam 1Y0-440 Topic 6 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-440 exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 6
[All 1Y0-440 Questions]

Scenario: Based on a discussion between a Citrix Architect and a team of Workspacelab members, the MPX Logical layout for Workspacelab has been created across three (3) sites.

The requirements captured during the design discussion held for a NetScaler design project are as follows:

Two (2) pairs of NetScaler MPX appliances deployed in the DMZ and internal network.

High Availability will be accessible for each NetScaler MPX

The external NetScaler MPX appliance will be deployed in multi-arm mode.

The internal NetScaler MPX will be deployed in single-arm mode wherein it will be connected to Cisco ACI Fabric.

All three (3) Workspacelab sites: Dc, NDR and DR, will have similar NetScaler configurations and design.

How many NetScaler MPX appliances should the architect deploy at each site to meet the design requirements above?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: E

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alica
7 months ago
I agree with Hubert, Item 4 looks like the culprit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
7 months ago
But Item 4 seems to have conflicting criteria, which could be the root cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
8 months ago
Item 1 seems like the odd one out. I bet the Architect is kicking themselves for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
8 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's Item 2 that's the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
8 months ago
Haha, Item 3 is the obvious answer. These Citrix guys must be living in the past or something.
upvoted 0 times
Christoper
8 months ago
Yeah, it seems like a pretty big oversight on their part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
8 months ago
I agree, Item 3 is definitely the culprit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cyril
8 months ago
I'm going with Item 2. It's the only one that doesn't match the security requirements. Rookie mistake!
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
9 months ago
Item 4 is definitely the culprit here. How could they have missed that?
upvoted 0 times
Aleta
7 months ago
We need to address this issue as soon as possible to ensure security compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
8 months ago
It's surprising that such a critical setting was overlooked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
8 months ago
I agree, Item 4 seems to be the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hubert
9 months ago
I think it might be Item 4 causing the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel