MENU
Scenario: A Citrix Architect is redesigning a Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops environment to include Machine Creation Services (MCS). During design discussions, the locations for the MCS-provisioned thin clone machine disks are proposed as shown in the exhibit.
Click the Exhibit button to view the details.
Which two potential issues should the architect address with the customer before proceeding with this configuration? (Choose two.)
Suggested Answer: A, B
Get Premium 1Y0-403 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
10 comments · newest first
LO
Louann
12 months ago
More storage on VM hosts? That sounds like a hassle!
WI
Wilford
12 months ago
NFS shared storage is a must for this setup, right?
CR
Cristen
1 year ago
Wait, is it really limited to certain hypervisors?
CH
Cherri
1 year ago
Totally agree, that's a big concern!
ME
Merilyn
1 year ago
It will require substantial write IOPS to the shared storage location.
SH
Shawnda
1 year ago
This is a good test of our understanding of the various ways to work with custom indicators. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of each approach.
FE
Felicitas
1 year ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. The tester's responsibility to consider the overall context of the product development aligns with the concept of a safety culture.
LY
Lynelle
1 year ago
Okay, let me see. A loose cable could potentially lead to data corruption, but that's more of an availability issue. Private use of data is more of a confidentiality concern. I think the best answer here is B - accidental alteration of data, since that directly impacts the integrity of the information.
TR
Trinidad
1 year ago
Okay, I think I know the basics of port aggregation, but I'm not sure about the specific details on the UA5000 board. I'll need to review my notes to see if I can find any information on that model.
DO
Domonique
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The second option about configuring the authentication brokers to issue service inventory-specific assertions sounds like the best approach. It seems to meet the requirement of minimal changes to the existing architecture.