MENU
Scenario: A Citrix Architect is designing a new Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops environment. The architect's objective is to create a configuration to automatically reroute network traffic to the second NIC within the bond. The goal is to avoid a loss of productivity should the primary Citrix Hypervisor host NIC fail. Each hypervisor currently consists of a single, active 10 GB NIC and a second, dormant 1 GB NIC.
Which two network interface configurations should the architect implement? (Choose two.)
Suggested Answer: A, C
Get Premium 1Y0-403 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
20 comments · newest first
VE
Velda
1 month ago
I feel A and D are best. They ensure redundancy and efficiency.
IR
Ira
1 month ago
A and C could work well together. Bonding is reliable.
VA
Val
2 months ago
I’m leaning towards B and D. SLB can optimize performance.
JE
Jeff
2 months ago
A is definitely needed for failover. D makes sense too.
SV
Svetlana
2 months ago
I prefer B and C. Active-passive seems risky for downtime.
FL
Fletcher
2 months ago
I think A and D are solid choices. Active-active can help with load balancing.
AR
Arlean
2 months ago
Active-passive just feels outdated for modern setups.
DA
Darrin
2 months ago
C is also a good choice for bonding, but I lean towards A and D.
TE
Temeka
3 months ago
Wait, why would you use a 1 GB NIC as backup? Seems slow.
JE
Jeannetta
3 months ago
Totally agree, LACP is solid for redundancy!
LO
Lorean
3 months ago
I think A and D are the best options here.
YU
Yuette
3 months ago
Active-active setups are usually more efficient, so D makes sense!
VA
Vallie
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards B and C, but not sure if they’ll handle failover well.
LY
Lynelle
3 months ago
Wait, why would you use a 1 GB NIC as backup? Seems slow.
SH
Shenika
5 months ago
Totally agree, LACP is the way to go!
SA
Santos
5 months ago
I think A and D are the best options here.
BE
Bethanie
6 months ago
I recall that active-active configurations can help with performance, but I wonder if they really provide the failover needed in this case.
SA
Sabine
6 months ago
I’m a bit confused about NIC teaming versus LACP. I think both can help with redundancy, but I’m not sure which one fits this scenario best.
WE
Werner
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between active-active and active-passive setups. I feel like active-active might be better for redundancy.
WI
Wilson
6 months ago
I think I remember that LACP is used for load balancing, but I'm not sure if active-passive is the right choice for failover.