Citrix 1Y0-241 Exam - Topic 3 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-241 exam

Question #: 100
Topic #: 3

[All 1Y0-241 Questions]

A Citrix Administrator needs to protect the HTTP backend server type without actually removing the header.

Which rewrite action type can the administrator apply to the Citrix ADC configuration to accomplish this?

AREPLACE

BCORRUPT_HTTP_HEADER

CREPLACE_HTTP_REQ

DREPLACE_ALL

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

https://docs.citrix.com/en-us/citrix-adc/current-release/appexpert/rewrite/rewrite-action-policy-examples/example-mask-http-server-type.html

by Mike at Jul 05, 2025, 12:34 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Y0-241 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Loren

5 months ago

REPLACE is a common choice, but I’m leaning towards C too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elenore

5 months ago

I’m pretty sure it’s not D, REPLACE_ALL.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shay

6 months ago

I disagree, it's definitely C, REPLACE_HTTP_REQ.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mignon

6 months ago

Wait, can you really use CORRUPT_HTTP_HEADER for this? Sounds risky!

upvoted 0 times

...

Geoffrey

6 months ago

I think the answer is B, CORRUPT_HTTP_HEADER.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fletcher

6 months ago

I don't think REPLACE_ALL is the right choice since it sounds too broad. It might remove more than just the header we want to protect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noble

7 months ago

I’m leaning towards REPLACE, but I’m not confident. I just remember it being used for modifying headers in some scenarios.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mariann

7 months ago

I remember practicing with similar questions, and I feel like REPLACE_HTTP_REQ could be relevant here. But I can't recall the specifics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marci

7 months ago

I think the answer might be CORRUPT_HTTP_HEADER, but I'm not entirely sure. It seems like it could fit the requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Andra

7 months ago

This is a good one. I feel confident that REPLACE is the right answer, but I'll make sure to review my work before submitting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fannie

7 months ago

I'm a bit confused on the difference between REPLACE and REPLACE_HTTP_REQ. I'll need to double-check the documentation to make sure I understand the distinction.

upvoted 0 times

...

Talia

8 months ago

Okay, I think I've got it. The key is to protect the HTTP backend server without actually removing the header, so I'm going to go with REPLACE.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaime

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this. I'll have to review the Citrix ADC configuration options to see which one fits best.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leontine

8 months ago

This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the requirements carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Narcisa

10 months ago

That makes sense. I see your point now. Thanks for clarifying.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amos

10 months ago

I think REPLACE_HTTP_REQ is the best option because it specifically targets HTTP requests, which is what we need to protect the backend server.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamal

10 months ago

Haha, CORRUPT_HTTP_HEADER? What is this, a hacking challenge? I'll stick with REPLACE, thank you very much.

upvoted 0 times

...

Narcisa

10 months ago

Why do you think that? Can you explain your rationale?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerlene

10 months ago

REPLACE_HTTP_REQ? Nah, that's not what we're after here. REPLACE is the way to go, no doubt about it.

upvoted 0 times

Lucia

10 months ago

Definitely, REPLACE is the correct rewrite action type for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sarah

10 months ago

I agree, REPLACE is the way to go to accomplish this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyril

10 months ago

I think REPLACE is the best option for protecting the HTTP backend server.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amos

10 months ago

I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) REPLACE_HTTP_REQ.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaun

10 months ago

REPLACE_ALL? That's overkill. I'm going with REPLACE. Keep it simple, right?

upvoted 0 times

Ngoc

9 months ago

Yeah, REPLACE_ALL might be too much for this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tegan

10 months ago

I agree, REPLACE seems like the most straightforward option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mariko

11 months ago

CORRUPT_HTTP_HEADER? Really? That sounds like a great way to break things. I'll pass on that one.

upvoted 0 times

Lynelle

10 months ago

Yeah, I think REPLACE is a safer option to protect the HTTP backend server type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catalina

10 months ago

I agree, CORRUPT_HTTP_HEADER does sound risky. I would go with REPLACE instead.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jose

11 months ago

Hmm, I think the answer is REPLACE. That seems like the most straightforward way to protect the backend server without removing the header.

upvoted 0 times

Dong

10 months ago

Yes, REPLACE is the most straightforward choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Veronica

11 months ago

I think so too, it's a simple and effective way to accomplish that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothy

11 months ago

I agree, REPLACE seems like the best option to protect the backend server.

upvoted 0 times

...

Narcisa

11 months ago

I think the answer is A) REPLACE.

upvoted 0 times

...