Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Citrix 1Y0-241 Exam - Topic 3 Question 100 Discussion

A Citrix Administrator needs to protect the HTTP backend server type without actually removing the header.Which rewrite action type can the administrator apply to the Citrix ADC configuration to accomplish this?
A) REPLACE
B) CORRUPT_HTTP_HEADER
C) REPLACE_HTTP_REQ
D) REPLACE_ALL

Citrix 1Y0-241 Exam - Topic 3 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-241 exam
Question #: 100
Topic #: 3
[All 1Y0-241 Questions]

A Citrix Administrator needs to protect the HTTP backend server type without actually removing the header.

Which rewrite action type can the administrator apply to the Citrix ADC configuration to accomplish this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

https://docs.citrix.com/en-us/citrix-adc/current-release/appexpert/rewrite/rewrite-action-policy-examples/example-mask-http-server-type.html


by Mike at Jul 05, 2025, 12:34 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Y0-241 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Loren
8 months ago
REPLACE is a common choice, but I’m leaning towards C too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
9 months ago
I’m pretty sure it’s not D, REPLACE_ALL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shay
9 months ago
I disagree, it's definitely C, REPLACE_HTTP_REQ.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
9 months ago
Wait, can you really use CORRUPT_HTTP_HEADER for this? Sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
9 months ago
I think the answer is B, CORRUPT_HTTP_HEADER.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
9 months ago
I don't think REPLACE_ALL is the right choice since it sounds too broad. It might remove more than just the header we want to protect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
10 months ago
I’m leaning towards REPLACE, but I’m not confident. I just remember it being used for modifying headers in some scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
10 months ago
I remember practicing with similar questions, and I feel like REPLACE_HTTP_REQ could be relevant here. But I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marci
10 months ago
I think the answer might be CORRUPT_HTTP_HEADER, but I'm not entirely sure. It seems like it could fit the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
10 months ago
This is a good one. I feel confident that REPLACE is the right answer, but I'll make sure to review my work before submitting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between REPLACE and REPLACE_HTTP_REQ. I'll need to double-check the documentation to make sure I understand the distinction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is to protect the HTTP backend server without actually removing the header, so I'm going to go with REPLACE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this. I'll have to review the Citrix ADC configuration options to see which one fits best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
11 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the requirements carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Narcisa
1 year ago
That makes sense. I see your point now. Thanks for clarifying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
1 year ago
I think REPLACE_HTTP_REQ is the best option because it specifically targets HTTP requests, which is what we need to protect the backend server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
1 year ago
Haha, CORRUPT_HTTP_HEADER? What is this, a hacking challenge? I'll stick with REPLACE, thank you very much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Narcisa
1 year ago
Why do you think that? Can you explain your rationale?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
1 year ago
REPLACE_HTTP_REQ? Nah, that's not what we're after here. REPLACE is the way to go, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Lucia
1 year ago
Definitely, REPLACE is the correct rewrite action type for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
1 year ago
I agree, REPLACE is the way to go to accomplish this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
1 year ago
I think REPLACE is the best option for protecting the HTTP backend server.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amos
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) REPLACE_HTTP_REQ.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
1 year ago
REPLACE_ALL? That's overkill. I'm going with REPLACE. Keep it simple, right?
upvoted 0 times
Ngoc
12 months ago
Yeah, REPLACE_ALL might be too much for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
1 year ago
I agree, REPLACE seems like the most straightforward option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mariko
1 year ago
CORRUPT_HTTP_HEADER? Really? That sounds like a great way to break things. I'll pass on that one.
upvoted 0 times
Lynelle
1 year ago
Yeah, I think REPLACE is a safer option to protect the HTTP backend server type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
1 year ago
I agree, CORRUPT_HTTP_HEADER does sound risky. I would go with REPLACE instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jose
1 year ago
Hmm, I think the answer is REPLACE. That seems like the most straightforward way to protect the backend server without removing the header.
upvoted 0 times
Dong
1 year ago
Yes, REPLACE is the most straightforward choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronica
1 year ago
I think so too, it's a simple and effective way to accomplish that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
1 year ago
I agree, REPLACE seems like the best option to protect the backend server.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Narcisa
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) REPLACE.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel