Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Citrix Exam 1Y0-241 Topic 3 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-241 exam
Question #: 100
Topic #: 3
[All 1Y0-241 Questions]

A Citrix Administrator needs to protect the HTTP backend server type without actually removing the header.

Which rewrite action type can the administrator apply to the Citrix ADC configuration to accomplish this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Marci
5 days ago
I think the answer might be CORRUPT_HTTP_HEADER, but I'm not entirely sure. It seems like it could fit the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andra
11 days ago
This is a good one. I feel confident that REPLACE is the right answer, but I'll make sure to review my work before submitting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
16 days ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between REPLACE and REPLACE_HTTP_REQ. I'll need to double-check the documentation to make sure I understand the distinction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
21 days ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is to protect the HTTP backend server without actually removing the header, so I'm going to go with REPLACE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
26 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this. I'll have to review the Citrix ADC configuration options to see which one fits best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
1 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the requirements carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Narcisa
3 months ago
That makes sense. I see your point now. Thanks for clarifying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
3 months ago
I think REPLACE_HTTP_REQ is the best option because it specifically targets HTTP requests, which is what we need to protect the backend server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
3 months ago
Haha, CORRUPT_HTTP_HEADER? What is this, a hacking challenge? I'll stick with REPLACE, thank you very much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Narcisa
3 months ago
Why do you think that? Can you explain your rationale?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
3 months ago
REPLACE_HTTP_REQ? Nah, that's not what we're after here. REPLACE is the way to go, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Lucia
3 months ago
Definitely, REPLACE is the correct rewrite action type for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
3 months ago
I agree, REPLACE is the way to go to accomplish this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
3 months ago
I think REPLACE is the best option for protecting the HTTP backend server.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amos
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) REPLACE_HTTP_REQ.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
4 months ago
REPLACE_ALL? That's overkill. I'm going with REPLACE. Keep it simple, right?
upvoted 0 times
Ngoc
2 months ago
Yeah, REPLACE_ALL might be too much for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
3 months ago
I agree, REPLACE seems like the most straightforward option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mariko
4 months ago
CORRUPT_HTTP_HEADER? Really? That sounds like a great way to break things. I'll pass on that one.
upvoted 0 times
Lynelle
3 months ago
Yeah, I think REPLACE is a safer option to protect the HTTP backend server type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
3 months ago
I agree, CORRUPT_HTTP_HEADER does sound risky. I would go with REPLACE instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jose
4 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is REPLACE. That seems like the most straightforward way to protect the backend server without removing the header.
upvoted 0 times
Dong
3 months ago
Yes, REPLACE is the most straightforward choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronica
4 months ago
I think so too, it's a simple and effective way to accomplish that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
4 months ago
I agree, REPLACE seems like the best option to protect the backend server.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Narcisa
4 months ago
I think the answer is A) REPLACE.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel