MENU
Which scenario will cause automatic high availability (HA) synchronization to fail?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium 1Y0-231 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
NO
Nobuko
3 months ago
C) A forced failover seems risky too. It can lead to unsynchronized states.
ED
Edgar
3 months ago
I agree, but B) A configuration change could also disrupt HA. Changes might not sync properly.
AS
Ashley
3 months ago
I think A) Different build versions is the right answer. Versions mismatch can break sync.
LU
Lucia
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about A? That seems a bit surprising!
ST
Stephaine
4 months ago
D) Manually forced synchronization? That sounds risky!
JO
Joseph
4 months ago
C) A forced failover shouldn't break HA, right?
CA
Cassi
5 months ago
I think B) A configuration change could also mess things up.
JO
Josphine
6 months ago
A) Different build versions will definitely cause issues.
YV
Yvonne
6 months ago
I remember discussing that manually forced synchronization should work fine, but I wonder if it could conflict with other processes.
GL
Glennis
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think forced failover could lead to issues, but I can't recall the exact details.
ST
Stephaine
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like a configuration change to the primary Citrix ADC might not necessarily break synchronization.
DE
Dean
7 months ago
I think option A, different build versions, could definitely cause HA synchronization to fail. I remember reading about compatibility issues.