Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Citrix 1Y0-231 Exam - Topic 12 Question 7 Discussion

Which Citrix ADC service monitor can a Citrix Administrator use to test the three-way handshake between the Citrix ADC and the backend server?
D) TCP
A) PING
B) UDP
C) LDAP

Citrix 1Y0-231 Exam - Topic 12 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-231 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 12
[All 1Y0-231 Questions]

Which Citrix ADC service monitor can a Citrix Administrator use to test the three-way handshake between the Citrix ADC and the backend server?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Ronald
10 months ago
PING is just for basic connectivity, not handshake testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vonda
10 months ago
LDAP? That's not even close!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not UDP? Seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
11 months ago
Agreed, TCP is the right choice here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
11 months ago
It's definitely TCP for the three-way handshake.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
11 months ago
Wait, I'm not sure the delimiter is a slash. The question mentions a "Delimited Text Parsing Strategy", so the delimiter could be something else. I'm a bit confused on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this. I'll need to re-read the question carefully and think through the different parts of the function point count.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arletta
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. Selective listening seems like it could be a barrier, as not fully paying attention to the message being communicated could prevent effective communication. I'll go with that for now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by the options. Aren't dynamic spectrum sharing (B) and dual connectivity (C) more related to 5G technology? I'm not sure if carrier aggregation would be the best approach in this case. I'll need to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel