Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 700-905 Exam - Topic 1 Question 72 Discussion

Posted by Leanora on Aug 05, 2024 at 10:32 AM

Which two processes does failure on a node initiate? (Choose two.)

Suggested Answer: D, E


Get Premium 700-905 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
CH
Charlesetta 11 months ago
I disagree with A, doesn't seem right to me.
CA
Carey 11 months ago
B is spot on, but D is also crucial for VMs.
KA
Kate 11 months ago
Surprised no one mentioned E! Isn't that a thing?
TO
Tommy 11 months ago
I thought it was A and C? Seems off.
CO
Colby 12 months ago
Definitely B and D! That's how it works.
JE
Jennie 12 months ago
I studied that nodes can be marked unhealthy, but I thought they still remain operational, which makes me question option E.
IS
Isadora 1 year ago
I feel like the call-home process is important, but I can't recall if it’s option C or if that’s something else entirely.
JA
Jacqueline 1 year ago
I remember something about VMs being moved during a failure, so I’m leaning towards option D for sure.
MI
Micheal 1 year ago
I think the affected node gets marked as unhealthy, but I'm not sure if it goes into standby mode or just stays operational.
JO
Jolene 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The node gets marked as unhealthy and placed into standby mode, and a call-home process is initiated to report the failure. Those seem like the two most likely processes that get triggered.
CU
Curtis 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. There are a lot of options and I'm not sure which two are the correct ones. I'll have to read through the choices carefully and try to eliminate the ones that don't seem right.
EM
Emmanuel 1 year ago
I've seen this type of question before. I'm pretty confident the affected node gets marked as unhealthy and the data gets migrated off to the master store. The other processes seem less clear to me.
KY
Kyoko 1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the processes that get initiated when a node fails.
ED
Eden 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. I know the node gets marked as unhealthy, but I'm not sure if it goes into standby mode or if the VMs get moved. I'll have to carefully consider each option.
ES
Estrella 1 year ago
/proc is definitely the way to go here. That's the directory where you can find all sorts of information about the running system.
SH
Sheridan 2 years ago
B and D seem like the obvious choices here. Although, I do wonder what kind of genius came up with option E. 'Mark it unhealthy but let it keep running'? Yeah, that'll end well.
PA
Paulina 2 years ago
↳ replying to Sheridan
D) The VMs on the failed node are moved to another node by vSphere high availability
SI
Simona 2 years ago
↳ replying to Sheridan
B) Affected node is marked as unhealthy and placed into standby mode
FL
Fletcher 2 years ago
I believe it's A and D, because data migration and VM movement are crucial in case of failure.
LO
Lottie 2 years ago
Ha! I bet the person who wrote option E has never actually worked with a real system before. That's just asking for trouble. I'm going with B and D - quarantine the node and move those VMs, no question.
BR
Brandee 2 years ago
↳ replying to Lottie
Yeah, B and D seem like the best course of action in case of node failure.
KI
King 2 years ago
↳ replying to Lottie
I think B is definitely necessary to isolate the affected node. D is a good way to keep things running smoothly.
MA
Marti 2 years ago
↳ replying to Lottie
Option E does seem risky, I agree. B and D sound like the safer choices.
AN
Anjelica 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about E. Marking the system as unhealthy but keeping it running seems like a recipe for disaster. I'd go with B and C - the failed node should be isolated and the issue reported.
RO
Rosendo 2 years ago
↳ replying to Anjelica
Definitely, isolating the failed node and reporting the issue are crucial steps.
WI
Wilbert 2 years ago
↳ replying to Anjelica
Yeah, marking the system as unhealthy but keeping it running doesn't sound like a good idea.
JA
Jamal 2 years ago
↳ replying to Anjelica
I agree, C is also important - the failure needs to be reported to TAC.
SH
Shanice 2 years ago
↳ replying to Anjelica
I think B is correct, the node should be marked as unhealthy and put into standby mode.
MA
Malissa 2 years ago
I'm not sure, I think it could be C and E.
DO
Dominga 2 years ago
I agree with Jeffrey. B and D are the correct answers. The system can't just remain operational with a failed node - that would be disastrous!
JE
Jeffrey 2 years ago
B and D for sure. The failed node needs to be marked unhealthy and the VMs need to be moved to another node to maintain availability.
ST
Stephen 2 years ago
↳ replying to Jeffrey
That's correct! Those are the two processes initiated when a node fails.
KA
Karon 2 years ago
↳ replying to Jeffrey
D) The VMs on the failed node are moved to another node by vSphere high availability
DO
Donette 2 years ago
↳ replying to Jeffrey
B) Affected node is marked as unhealthy and placed into standby mode
CA
Catalina 2 years ago
I agree with Lou, B and D make sense.
LO
Lou 2 years ago
I think it's B and D.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel