MENU
Which Catalyst IE switch acts as an SD-Access (SDA) Extension Policy Extended Node?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium 700-826 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
In the industrial security sales play, the stakeholder typically tasked with choosing the Industrial Control Systems (ICS) security solution is the Operational Technology (OT) team. The OT team is directly responsible for the continuity, efficiency, and safety of the industrial processes. Their deep understanding of the operational requirements and the critical nature of the systems makes them the primary decision-makers for security solutions that impact production and operational environments.
Reference: This conclusion is based on industry standards and roles where OT teams are primarily engaged in managing and securing operational technologies within industrial setups.
44 comments · newest first
LA
Lavera
11 months ago
Just checked, it's definitely the IE4010!
FE
Felicidad
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about the IE4010? Sounds off.
YA
Yasuko
11 months ago
Definitely IE3400, no doubt about it!
DE
Delmy
11 months ago
I thought it was the IE5000?
DA
Dallas
12 months ago
It's the IE4010 for sure.
OR
Ora
12 months ago
I thought the IE2000 was more of a basic switch, so I doubt it’s the answer here. I need to double-check my notes on the Extended Node functions.
VA
Valentine
1 year ago
I’m leaning towards the IE4010, but I remember there were a lot of details about each model that I might have mixed up.
DA
Dana
1 year ago
I feel like the IE5000 was mentioned in a similar practice question, but I can't recall if it was specifically for the Extended Node role.
MI
Miles
1 year ago
I think the IE3400 might be the right choice, but I’m not completely sure. I remember something about it being used in SD-Access scenarios.
MA
Margarita
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards the IE5000 since it's the highest-end model listed, but I'm not sure if that necessarily means it supports the SDA functionality we're looking for. Gotta be careful with assumptions.
TO
Tonette
1 year ago
The IE3400 seems like a good option, but I'm not 100% confident that it acts as an SDA Extension Policy Extended Node. I'll have to double-check the specifications.
GI
Gilma
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the IE4010 is the correct answer here, as it's the only Catalyst IE switch model listed that supports SD-Access functionality.
ZO
Zona
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with the SD-Access capabilities of the different Catalyst IE switch models. I'll have to think this through carefully.
LA
Lashonda
1 year ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different options and how they relate to file-system buffering and data loss mitigation.
TA
Tamekia
1 year ago
Okay, I remember learning about provider edge (PE) and customer edge (CE) devices in class. I think I can use that knowledge to answer this.
BE
Bernadine
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused here. Do we need to apply the patch to the 4.6.0 or 4.6.3 kernel source directory? Or does it matter which version we use as long as it's a previous version?
ME
Merlyn
1 year ago
Frameworks can be great for speeding up development, but you have to be careful about potential security issues. That's definitely something to consider.
GE
German
1 year ago
The IE4010 is clearly the answer. It's like they're saying, 'Hey, this is the one you want!' Can't argue with that kind of directness.
FR
Freida
1 year ago
IE4010 it is then.
CA
Carman
1 year ago
Yeah, no need to overthink it.
AN
Annice
1 year ago
It's great when the answer is clear like that.
BE
Beckie
1 year ago
IE4010 is the one for SD-Access Extension Policy Extended Node.
JA
Jacquelyne
1 year ago
I'm going to have to go with A, the IE2000. Why? Because it's the smallest number, and we all know the lower the number, the better the tech, right? Flawless logic.
ST
Stevie
1 year ago
User 3: Well, I'm still going with A, the IE2000. Lower number, better tech, right?
RA
Rashida
1 year ago
User 2: I see your point, but I'm sticking with D, the IE5000. It seems like the most powerful option.
SH
Sheridan
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure it's the IE5000, not the IE2000.
BE
Bernardo
1 year ago
User 1: I think I'll go with B, the IE3400. It sounds more advanced.
MA
Maia
1 year ago
No way, the IE4010 is the one you're looking for.
BE
Bernardo
1 year ago
I think it's actually the IE3400, not the IE2000.
GA
Galen
1 year ago
B, the IE3400, is my pick. Mainly because it has a cool-sounding name. Who doesn't love a good '3400' in their network devices?
TA
Tammara
1 year ago
IE4010 is a good option as well, it offers great performance.
RO
Rozella
1 year ago
I would go with IE5000 for its features.
EA
Earlean
1 year ago
I agree, the name does sound pretty cool.
JE
Jess
1 year ago
I think IE3400 is a solid choice.
AN
Anjelica
2 years ago
Hmm, tough one. I'd have to say D, the IE5000, since it's the highest-end model in the list. Gotta go big or go home, right?
PE
Pete
1 year ago
Yeah, I agree. It's always good to go big when it comes to network switches.
WI
Willie
1 year ago
I think you might be right, the IE5000 does sound like a high-end model.
ST
Stevie
2 years ago
The IE4010 sounds like the right answer, as it's specifically mentioned as an SDA Extension Policy Extended Node. I'll go with C.
AI
Aileen
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) IE4010 could also be a potential option for this question.
DE
Delila
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe it is B) IE3400 because of its advanced features.
ON
Oneida
2 years ago
I think the answer is D) IE5000.
GE
Gerald
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think IE4010 could also be a potential option for SD-Access Extension Policy.
JO
Joanna
2 years ago
I agree with Willodean, IE3400 makes sense for SD-Access Extension Policy.
WI
Willodean
2 years ago
I think the answer is B) IE3400.