Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 500-490 Exam - Topic 6 Question 71 Discussion

Which two Cisco ISE use cases typically involve the highest level of implementation complexity? (Choose two.)
C) Software-defined segmentation
A) Device management
B) Asset visibility
D) Software-defined access
E) Guest and wireless access

Cisco 500-490 Exam - Topic 6 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-490 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 6
[All 500-490 Questions]

Which two Cisco ISE use cases typically involve the highest level of implementation complexity? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Nieves
9 months ago
Agreed, C and D are a nightmare to implement!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
9 months ago
B is pretty simple compared to the others, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanford
10 months ago
Surprised to see C listed, I thought it was more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
10 months ago
I think A and E are more complex, honestly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
10 months ago
Definitely C and D, those are the trickiest!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
10 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think device management was mentioned as complex, but I can't recall the second one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lewis
11 months ago
I feel like software-defined access could be tricky too, especially with all the integration needed with existing systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
11 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think guest and wireless access might also have a high implementation complexity because of the security requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
11 months ago
I remember studying that software-defined segmentation can be quite complex due to the policies involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miss
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards software-defined segmentation and guest/wireless access as the two most complex use cases. The guest and wireless access can get pretty tricky with all the different authentication and security requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. Software-defined segmentation and software-defined access both involve a lot of network configuration and integration, so those seem like the most complex use cases to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I think device management and asset visibility might also be up there in terms of complexity. I'll need to review those areas more closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident that software-defined segmentation and software-defined access would be the two use cases with the highest implementation complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
1 year ago
I heard the correct answer involves buying the entire Cisco product lineup. Apparently, it's the only way to get full functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
1 year ago
C and D for sure. I can already feel the migraine coming on just thinking about the amount of configuration involved.
upvoted 0 times
Meaghan
1 year ago
True, those are also quite involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
1 year ago
E) Guest and wireless access
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
1 year ago
I know, the configuration for those can be really complex.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
1 year ago
D) Software-defined access
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
1 year ago
C) Software-defined segmentation
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherry
1 year ago
As an IT support tech, I'm just glad I don't have to deal with the headaches of implementing these use cases. Leave it to the networking gurus!
upvoted 0 times
Elly
1 year ago
E) Guest and wireless access
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
1 year ago
C) Software-defined segmentation
upvoted 0 times
...
Brande
1 year ago
A) Device management
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tori
1 year ago
I believe asset visibility and guest and wireless access are also complex, as they involve managing different types of devices and access levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
1 year ago
I'd agree with C and D, but I'm also curious about E. Handling guest and wireless access can get pretty tricky, especially with all the security concerns.
upvoted 0 times
Raymon
1 year ago
D) Software-defined access
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
1 year ago
C) Software-defined segmentation
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marlon
1 year ago
I agree with Tanesha, those two options require a lot of configuration and planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
1 year ago
C and D seem like the most complex use cases, requiring a deep understanding of network topology and access policies.
upvoted 0 times
Shannan
1 year ago
Guest and wireless access are also important, but C and D definitely stand out in terms of complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
1 year ago
I think implementing software-defined segmentation and access can be challenging, but it's crucial for network security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
1 year ago
Device management and asset visibility are important too, but C and D require more in-depth knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorcas
1 year ago
I agree, C and D are definitely more complex compared to the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tanesha
1 year ago
I think software-defined segmentation and software-defined access are the most complex.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel