Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 500-490 Exam - Topic 6 Question 71 Discussion

Posted by Ernest on Nov 14, 2024 at 01:18 AM

Which two Cisco ISE use cases typically involve the highest level of implementation complexity? (Choose two.)

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium 500-490 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
NI
Nieves 11 months ago
Agreed, C and D are a nightmare to implement!
YE
Yen 11 months ago
B is pretty simple compared to the others, right?
ST
Stanford 11 months ago
Surprised to see C listed, I thought it was more straightforward.
FL
Fletcher 11 months ago
I think A and E are more complex, honestly.
CA
Cammy 12 months ago
Definitely C and D, those are the trickiest!
BR
Brittani 12 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think device management was mentioned as complex, but I can't recall the second one.
LE
Lewis 1 year ago
I feel like software-defined access could be tricky too, especially with all the integration needed with existing systems.
UN
Una 1 year ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think guest and wireless access might also have a high implementation complexity because of the security requirements.
FE
Fernanda 1 year ago
I remember studying that software-defined segmentation can be quite complex due to the policies involved.
MI
Miss 1 year ago
I'm leaning towards software-defined segmentation and guest/wireless access as the two most complex use cases. The guest and wireless access can get pretty tricky with all the different authentication and security requirements.
CA
Cathrine 1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. Software-defined segmentation and software-defined access both involve a lot of network configuration and integration, so those seem like the most complex use cases to me.
KA
Karol 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I think device management and asset visibility might also be up there in terms of complexity. I'll need to review those areas more closely.
TA
Tarra 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that software-defined segmentation and software-defined access would be the two use cases with the highest implementation complexity.
AR
Art 1 year ago
I heard the correct answer involves buying the entire Cisco product lineup. Apparently, it's the only way to get full functionality.
AD
Adelina 1 year ago
C and D for sure. I can already feel the migraine coming on just thinking about the amount of configuration involved.
ME
Meaghan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adelina
True, those are also quite involved.
CA
Carole 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adelina
E) Guest and wireless access
UN
Una 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adelina
I know, the configuration for those can be really complex.
CA
Catalina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adelina
D) Software-defined access
AL
Alita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adelina
C) Software-defined segmentation
CH
Cherry 2 years ago
As an IT support tech, I'm just glad I don't have to deal with the headaches of implementing these use cases. Leave it to the networking gurus!
EL
Elly 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cherry
E) Guest and wireless access
WI
Willow 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cherry
C) Software-defined segmentation
BR
Brande 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cherry
A) Device management
TO
Tori 2 years ago
I believe asset visibility and guest and wireless access are also complex, as they involve managing different types of devices and access levels.
JE
Jesusita 2 years ago
I'd agree with C and D, but I'm also curious about E. Handling guest and wireless access can get pretty tricky, especially with all the security concerns.
RA
Raymon 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jesusita
D) Software-defined access
LE
Leigha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jesusita
C) Software-defined segmentation
MA
Marlon 2 years ago
I agree with Tanesha, those two options require a lot of configuration and planning.
BO
Bok 2 years ago
C and D seem like the most complex use cases, requiring a deep understanding of network topology and access policies.
SH
Shannan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Bok
Guest and wireless access are also important, but C and D definitely stand out in terms of complexity.
MI
Michell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Bok
I think implementing software-defined segmentation and access can be challenging, but it's crucial for network security.
JO
Jolanda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Bok
Device management and asset visibility are important too, but C and D require more in-depth knowledge.
DO
Dorcas 1 year ago
↳ replying to Bok
I agree, C and D are definitely more complex compared to the others.
TA
Tanesha 2 years ago
I think software-defined segmentation and software-defined access are the most complex.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel