Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 500-420 Exam - Topic 3 Question 53 Discussion

Developers and operations personnel complain the Controller tracks many irrelevant Java classes and methods. How does a Performance Analyst exclude this unhelpful information?
C) Configuration > Instrumentation > Call Graph Settings and exclude irrelevant packages
A) Configuration > Baselines and create a new dynamic baseline
B) Edit the mbeans-server.xml file to delete the irrelevant methods
D) Edit the controller-info.xml file to exclude irrelevant methods

Cisco 500-420 Exam - Topic 3 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 500-420 exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 3
[All 500-420 Questions]

Developers and operations personnel complain the Controller tracks many irrelevant Java classes and methods. How does a Performance Analyst exclude this unhelpful information?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

To streamline the monitoring process and enhance the relevance of collected data, AppDynamics allows Performance Analysts to exclude certain Java classes and methods from instrumentation. This is done through the 'Configuration > Instrumentation > Call Graph Settings' menu, where irrelevant packages and classes can be specified for exclusion. This approach prevents the AppDynamics agent from tracking unnecessary or irrelevant methods, thus reducing overhead and focusing on the most critical aspects of application performance.


AppDynamics documentation on Call Graph Settings: This section details how to configure call graph settings, including the exclusion of specific classes and methods from instrumentation, to optimize performance monitoring.

by Na at Jul 20, 2026, 01:40 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 500-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Salena
21 hours ago
I feel overwhelmed by all these options. But I lean towards A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
6 days ago
I think option C is the best choice. It directly addresses the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
11 days ago
Not sure about D, seems like it could cause issues later.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
16 days ago
Totally agree with C, it’s the easiest method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
22 days ago
Wait, can you really edit mbeans-server.xml? Sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
27 days ago
I think A is better for dynamic baselines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
1 month ago
Option C is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
1 month ago
I'm leaning towards A, but I wonder if creating a new dynamic baseline is really the right approach for excluding irrelevant methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
1 month ago
I feel like I've seen a similar question where we had to exclude certain classes, and I think it was related to instrumentation settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
2 months ago
I remember something about editing configuration files, but I can't recall if it's mbeans-server.xml or controller-info.xml.
upvoted 0 times
...
Telma
2 months ago
I think the answer might be C, but I'm not entirely sure how the Call Graph Settings work in that context.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel